Skip to main content

An Analysis of the Principal Criticisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Suspicions of Markets
  • 452 Accesses

Abstract

A consideration of the arguments that markets are inadequate and inefficient, impersonal, encourage extensive commodification, are guided by poor motivation, unfavourably affect the income distribution and create a different culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bagehot, W. (1905). Economic studies. In R. H. Hutton (Ed.) (1915), The works and life of Walter Bagehot (Vol. 7). London/New York/Bombay: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1997). Say’s law of markets: What did it mean and why should we care. Eastern Economic Journal, 23, 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1998 [1958]). The affluent society. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D. (1987). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. J., & Lunn, J. (2007). Markets and morality. Things ethicists should consider when evaluating market exchange. Journal of Religious Ethics, 35, 627–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R. (2004). On obnoxious markets. In S. Cullenberg & P. Pattanaik (Eds.), Globalization, culture and the limits of the market: Essays in economics and philosophy. New Delhi/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1948). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. (Ed.). (1991). The market experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, D. R. (1997). The religion of the market. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 65(2), 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920a). Industry and trade: A study of industrial technique, and business organisation; and of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations. London: Macmillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital. A critique of political economy (trans: Fowkes, B. 3 vols.). Harmondsworth/Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848 [1995]). The communist manifesto. Harmondsworth/Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. M. (1808). Commerce defended: An answer to the arguments of Mr Spence, Mr Corbell, and others, have attempted to prove that commerce is not a source of national wealth. London: C and R Baldwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1844). Essays on some unsettled questions of political economy. London: John W Parker/Harrison and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1917). Principles of political economy (8th ed.). London: Longmans, Green and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minogue, K. (1963). The liberal mind. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. A. (2003). The jurisprudence of greed. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1097–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reda, A. (2013). Islam and markets. Review of Social Economy, 71, 220–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1821, 1971). On the principles of political economy and taxation Harmondsworth: Penguin. (edit Hartwell, R. M.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E. (2006). Repugnance as a constraint on markets (Working Paper 12702). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2003). What money can’t buy. The moral limits of markets. The Tanner lectures on human values. Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. [1976 1776]. The wealth of nations. Indianapolis: The Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, C. (2015). Selfishness, greed and capitalism. Debunking myths about the free market. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality. How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. (1996). Human action: A treatise on economics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, J., & Kumar, K. (Eds.). (1997). Public and private in thought and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, R. D. (1988). The just economy. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rutherford, D. (2016). An Analysis of the Principal Criticisms. In: Suspicions of Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40808-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40808-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40807-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40808-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics