In Situ Hybridization in Clinical Biomarker Development

Chapter
Part of the AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series book series (AAPS, volume 21)

Abstract

Biomarkers are being utilized from early to clinical phases of drug development. Nucleic acid-based biomarkers have proven their significance in predicting disease occurrence, identifying the reason for variable drug responses and helping in personalized targeted therapy. There are various techniques available for analyzing nucleic acid-based biomarkers in body fluids and in tissue homogenates; however, detection of tissue-based biomarkers in the context of tissue/cell morphology is still limited to the use of in situ hybridization (ISH) technology. This book chapter provides an overview of available ISH technologies, efforts made toward the advancement of ISH to increase the sensitivity and specificity of assays and their applications in clinical biomarker.

Key terms

Biomarker

Biomarker is an indicator of normal and pathogenic process, progress of disease, or effect of therapeutic interventions and it can be measured in body fluids or tissues

In situ hybridization (ISH)

In situ hybridization (ISH) is a type of hybridization method that uses a labeled complementary DNA or RNA strand to localize a specific DNA or RNA sequence in a section of tissue

Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue

It is tissue processing method used in histology labs to preserve and archive clinical specimens

Tissue Micro Array (TMA)

TMA consists of multiple separate tissue cores that are assembled in array fashion to allow multiplex histological analysis

References

  1. 1.
    Halim AB (2011) Biomarkers in drug development: a useful tool but discrepant results may have a major impact. In: Kapetanović I (ed) Drug discovery and development—present and future. ISBN: 978-953-307-615-7. doi:10.5772/27526 (InTech, Chapter 18)
  2. 2.
    Frank R, Hargreaves R (2003) Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:566–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwarzacher T (2003) DNA, chromosomes, and in situ hybridization. Genome 46(6):953–962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jin L, Chandler WF, Smart JB, England BG, Lloyd RV (1993) Differentiation of human pituitary adenomas determines the pattern of chromogranin/secretogranin messenger ribonucleic acid expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76(3):728–735Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varma VA, Cerjan CM, Abbot KL, Hunter SB (1994) Non-isotopic in situ hybridization method for mitochondria in oncocytes. Histochem Cytochem 42:273–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiflemariam S, Andersson S, Asplund A et al (2012) In situ hybridization on tissue arrays for validation of novel cancer and tissue-specific biomarkers. PLoS ONE 7(3):e32927CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bishop R (2010) Applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting genetic aberrations of medical significance. Biosci Horiz 3(1):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polak JM, O’D McGee J (1990) In situ hybridization: principles and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 10–30Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanke M, Hoefig K, Merz H et al (2010) A robust methodology to study urine microRNA as tumor marker: microRNA-126 and microRNA-182 are related to urinary bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 28(6):655–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xie Y, Todd NW, Liu Z et al (2010) Altered miRNA expression in sputum for diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 67:170–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qian W, Lu Z, Li H et al (2011) Next-generation sequencing of MicroRNAs for breast cancer detection. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:1–7Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jorgensen S, Baker A, Moller S, Nielsen BS (2010) Robust one-day in situ hybridization protocol for detection of microRNA in paraffin samples using LNA probes. Methods 52(4):375–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pena JTG, Sohn-Lee C, Rouhanifard SH et al (2009) miRNA in situ hybridization in mammalian tissues fixed with formaldehyde and EDC. Nat Methods 6(2):139–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nuovo GJ (2008) In situ detection of precursor and mature microRNAs in paraffin embedded, formalin fixed tissues and cell preparations. Methods 44:39–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silahtaroglu AN, Nolting D, Dyrskjot L et al (2007) Detection of microRNAs in frozen tissue sections by fluorescence in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes and tyramide signal amplification. Nat Protoc 2:2520–2528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu X, Sempere LF, Ouyang H et al (2010) MicroRNA-31 functions as an oncogenic microRNA in mouse and human lung cancer cells by repressing specific tumor suppressors. J Clin Invest 120(4):1298–1309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh U, Keirstead N, Wolujczyk A et al (2013) General principles and methods for routine automated microRNA in situ hybridization and double labeling with immunohistochemistry. Biotech Histochem 1–8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang F, Flanagan J, Su N et al (2012) A novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagn 14(1):22–29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Player NP, Lu-Ping Shen, Kenny D et al (2001) Single-copy gene detection using branched DNA (bDNA) in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 49(5):603–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Affymetrix QuantiGene®ViewRNAISH (2012) Tissue assay on Leica BOND RX staining platform. Press ReleaseGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cayre A, Mishellany F, Lagarde N, Penault-Llorca F et al (2007) Comparison of different commercial kits for HER2 testing in breast cancer: looking for the accurate cutoff for amplification. Breast Cancer Res 9(5):R64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thunnissen Erik, Bubendorf Lukas, Dietel Manfred et al (2012) EML4-ALK testing in non-small cell carcinomas of the lung: a review with recommendations. Virchows Arch 461(3):245–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maruo R, Yamada H, Watanabe M et al (2011) mRNA quantification after fluorescence activated cell sorting using locked nucleic acid probes. Mol Biotechnol 49(1):42–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartlett JM, Campbell FM, Ibrahim M et al (2011) A UK NEQAS ISH multicenter ring study using the ventana HER2 dual-color ISH assay. Am J Clin Pathol 135(1):157–162Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schunck C, Johannes T, Varga D et al (2004) New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: Unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals. Cytogenet Genome Res 104:383–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lev D, Daniely M, Zudik A et al (2005) Automatic scanning of interphase FISH for prenatal diagnosis in uncultured amniocytes. Genet Test 9:41–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang YP, Castleman KR (2005) Normalization of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) images for improving color karyotyping. Cytometry A 64A:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Translational MedicineMerck & Co.RahwayUSA

Personalised recommendations