The Changing State-of-the-Art of the Conflict Transformation Field (2011)

Part of the Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice book series (PAHSEP, volume 1)


Conflict transformation as a reality has existed throughout human history, but as a field of study and practice, it emerged only in the early 1990s. The field incorporates some of the core ideas of the contemporary conflict resolution approach, but it focuses attention on large-scale, protracted and destructive conflicts and how they change so they are conducted constructively, in large measure. The term refers both to the processes of transition to relatively non-destructive conduct and to a relationship between adversaries that is regarded as largely non-contentious. In this analysis, I include the actions of adversaries as well as interveners in affecting conflict transformations. Two phases of transformation are of interest here. First is the transition from destructive to constructive contention, often focusing on ending widespread violence. The second phase refers to fashioning an enduring peaceful relationship, including recovering from the destructive conflict.


Conflict Resolution Nongovernmental Organization Violent Conflict Structural Violence Peace Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Agha, Hussein, Shai Feldman, Ahmad Khalidi, and Zeev Schiff. 2003. Track-II Diplomacy: Lessons from the Middle East. Cambridge, Massachusetts-London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, Richard L. and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. 2007. “A Smarter more Secure America.” Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, Nicole, and Luc van de Goor. 2006. “Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Mapping Issues, Dilemmas and Guiding Principles.” Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.Google Scholar
  5. Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov, ed. (Ed.). 2003. From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bercovitch, Jacob, Viktor Kremenyuk and I. William Zartman (Ed.). 2009. Sage Handbook of Conflict Resolution. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Billon, Phillippe Le. 2008. “Diamond Wars? Conflict Diamonds and Geographies of Resource Wars.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98(2):345–372.Google Scholar
  8. Borer, Tristan Anne, John Darby and Siobhan McEvoy-Levy. 2006. Peacebuilding After Peace Accords: The Challenge of Violence, Truth, and Youth. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burton, John. 1990. Conflict: Resolution and Prevention. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  10. Caprioli, Mary and Mark A. Boyer. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4):503–518.Google Scholar
  11. Crocker, Chester A., Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall (Ed.). 2005. Grasping the Nettle: Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflicts. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, John and Edward (Edy) Kaufman (Ed.). 2002. Second Track/Citizens’ Diplomacy: Concepts and Techniques for Conflict Transformation. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Dayton, Bruce W. and Louis Kriesberg (Ed.). 2009. Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding: Moving From Violence to Sustainable Peace. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, Larry. 2005. Squandered Victory. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  15. Evangelista, Matthew. 1999. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fontan, Victoria. 2008. Voices from Post-Saddam Iraq: Living with Terrorism, Insurgency and New Forms of Tyranny. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Fusato, Massimo. 2003. “Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants.” in Beyond Intractability. Boulder, Co.: Eds. Guy Burgess and Heid Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium. University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  18. Galtung, Johan. 1969. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research 3 (3): 168.Google Scholar
  19. Gibbs, David N. 2009. First Do No Harm: Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson, James L. 2006. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publication.Google Scholar
  21. Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 2008. “The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On.” International Studies Quarterly 52 (4):691–712.Google Scholar
  22. Gleditsch, Nils Petter & Havard Hegre. 1997. “Peace and Democracy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2):283–310.Google Scholar
  23. Goldstein, Joshua S. and John R. Freeman. 1990. Three-Way Street: Strategic Reciprocity in World Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gopin, Marc. 2002. Holy War, Holy Peace: How Religion Can Bring Peace to the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gourevitch, Philip. 2009 “The Life After.” Pp. 36–49 in The New Yorker, May 4. Google Scholar
  26. Greenhill, Kelly M. and Solomon Major. 2006/07. “The Perils of Profiling: Civil War Spoilers and the Collapse of Intrastate Peace Accords.” International Security 31 (3):7–40.Google Scholar
  27. Hampson, Fen Osler. 1996. Nurturing Peace: Why Peace Settlements Succeed of Fail. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hartzell, Caroline, Mathew Hoddie and Donald Rothchild. 2001. “Stablizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables.” International Organization 55 (1):183–208.Google Scholar
  29. Hartzell, Caroline, Mathew Hoddie, and Donald Rothchild. 2001 Winter. “Stabilizing the Peace after Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables.” International Organization 55:183–208.Google Scholar
  30. Harzell, Caroline and Matthew Hoddie. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and PostCivil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (2):318–332.Google Scholar
  31. Hastings, Tom H. 2004. Nonviolent response to terrorism. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland.Google Scholar
  32. Hemmer, Bruce. 2008. “The Democratization of Peacebuilding: Democratic Exposure and Externally Democratic Ideology of Peacebuilding NGOs in Northern Ireland and Bosnia.” Pp. 71–111 in Pushing the Boundaries: New Frontiers in Conflict Resolution and Collaboration, edited by Rachel. Fleishman, Catherine Gerard, and Rosemary O’Leary. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  33. Hewitt, Joseph J., Jonathan Wilkenfeld, and Ted Gurr (Eds.). 2010. Peace and Conflict 2010. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Kriesberg, Louis. 1995. “Varieties of Mediating Activities and of Mediators.” Pp. 219–233 in Resolving International Conflicts, edited by Jacob Bercovitch. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  35. Kriesberg, Louis. 1998. “Coexistence and Reconciliation of Communal Conflicts.” Pp. 182–198 in Handbook on Coexistence, edited by Eugene Weiner. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kriesberg, Louis. 2006. “Assessing Past Strategies for Countering Terrorism, in Lebanon and by Libya.” Peace and Conflict Studies 23 (2):1–20.Google Scholar
  37. Kriesberg, Louis. 2007a. Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution, 3rd Ed. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  38. Kriesberg, Louis. 2007b. “Long Peace or Long War: A Conflict Resolution Perspective.” Negotiation Journal 23 (2):97–116.Google Scholar
  39. Kriesberg, Louis. 2008. “Conflict Transformation.” Pp. Vol. 1: 401–412 in Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict, edited by Lester Kurtz. Amsterdam Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Kriesberg, Louis. 2009a. “The Evolution of Conflict Resolution.” Pp. 15–32 in Sage Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk, and I. William Zartman. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Kriesberg, Louis. 2009b. “Changing Conflict Asymmetries Constructively.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 2 (1) March:4–22.Google Scholar
  42. Kriesberg, Louis, and Stuart J. Thorson (Eds.). 1991. Timing the De-Escalation of International Conflicts. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Laue, James, and Gerald Cormick. 1978. “The Ethics of Intervention in Community Disputes.” in The Ethics of Social Intervention, edited by Gordon Bermant, Herbert C. Kelman, and Donald P. Warwick. Washington, DC: Halstead Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lederach, John Paul. 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  45. Licklider, Roy. 1995. “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993.” American Political Science Review 89:682.Google Scholar
  46. Long, William J. and Peter Brecke. 2003. War and Reconciliation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lyons, Terrence. 2005. Demilitarizing Politics: Elections on the Uncertain Road to Peace. Boulder London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  48. Marshall, Monty G. and Donna Ramsey Marshall. 2005. “Gender Empowerment and the Willingness of States to Use Force.” Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
  49. Mattes, Michaela and Burcu Savun. 2009. “Fostering Peace After Civil War: Commitment Problems and Agreement Design.” International Studies Quarterly 53:737–759.Google Scholar
  50. McDonald, John W., and Diane B. Bendahmane (Eds.). 1987. Conflict Resolution: Track Two Diplomacy. Washington D.C.: Foreign Service Institute, U.S. Department of State.Google Scholar
  51. Melander, Eric. 2005. “Gender Equality and Intrastate Armed Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (December):695–714.Google Scholar
  52. Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mitchell, Christopher. 2000. Gestures of Conciliation: Factors Contributing to Successful Olive Branches. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mitrany, David. 1944. A Working Peace System. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Montville, Joseph V. 1991. “Transnationalism and the Role of Track-Two Diplomacy.” Pp. 253269 in Approaches to Peace: An Intellectual Map, edited by W. Scott Thompson and Kenneth M. Jensen. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  56. Muggah, Robert (Ed.). 2008. Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction Dealing with Fighters in the Aftermath of War. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  58. O’Leary, Rosemary, and Lisa Bingham. 2003. The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  59. Osgood, Charles E. 1962. An Alternative to War or Surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  60. Pace, Marie and Darren Kew. 2008. “Catalysts of Change Applying New Forms of Practice to the Context of Nigeria’s Democratic Development.” in Cutting-Edge Theories and Recent Developments in Conflict Resolution edited by Rosemary O’Leary Rachel Fleishman, and Catherine Gerard. 29. Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.Google Scholar
  61. Paris, Roland. 2004. At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Polkinghorn, Brian D. Haleigh La Chance and Robert LaChance. 2008. “Constructing a Baseline Understanding of Developmental Trends in Graduate Conflict Resolution Programs in the United States.” Pp. 233–265 in Pushing the Boundaries: New Frontiers in Conflict Resolution and Collaboration, edited by Catherine Gerard Rachel Fleishman, and Rosemary O’Leary. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  63. Pouligny, Beatrice, Simon Chesterman and Albrecht Schnabel (Ed.). 2007. After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ramsbotham, Oliver, Tom Woodhouse, and Hugh Miall. 2005. Contemporary Conflict Resolution, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  65. Rigby, Andrew. 2001. Justice and Reconciliation after the Violence. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  66. Rouhana, Nadim N. 2004. “Group Identity and Power Asymmetry in Reconciliation Processes: The Israeli-Palestinian Case.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 10 (1):33–52.Google Scholar
  67. Rubenstein, Richard E. 2008. “Conflict Resolution in an Age of Empire: New Challenges to an Emerging Field.” in A Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution, edited by Dennis Sandole Sean Byrne, Ingrid Staroste, and Jessica Senehi. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Rubinstein, Robert A. 2008. Peacekeeping Under Fire: Culture and Intervention. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  69. Rupesinghe, Kumar (Ed.). 1995. Conflict Transformation. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  70. Russett, Bruce & John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sandole, Dennis J. D., Sean Byrne, Ingrid Sandole-Staroste and Jessica Senehi. 2009. Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Schmelzle, Beatrix and Martina Fisher (Ed.). 2009. Peacebuilding at a Crossroads? Dilemmas and Paths for Another Generation. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  73. Senghaas, Dieter. 2001. The Clash within Civilizations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Senghaas, Dieter. 2004. “The Civilisation of Conflict: Constructive Pacifism as a Guiding Notion for Conflict Transformation.” in Concepts and Cross-cutting Challenges, edited by Martina Fischer and Norbert Ropers. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  75. Sherif, Muzafer. 1966. In Common Predicament. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, Jackie; Charles Chatfield and Ron Pagnucco, eds. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Stedman, John Stephen. 1997. “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes.” International Security Fall, Vol. 22 no. 2:5–53.Google Scholar
  78. Stedman, Stephen John, Donald Rothchild and Elizabeth M. Cousens, eds. (Ed.). 2002. Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements. Boulder-London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  79. Stephenson, Carolyn M. 1996. “Gender Differences in Conflict Resolution.” in United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Political Decision-Making and Conflict Resolution: The Impact of Gender Difference. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: UN Document #EGM/PDCR/12996/EP4.Google Scholar
  80. Stephenson, Carolyn M. 2008. “Peace Studies, Overview.” in Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, and Conflict, 2nd Ed., edited by Lester Kurtz. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  81. Touval, Saadia, and I. William Zartman (Eds.). 1985. International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  82. Zahar, Marie-Joelle. 2008. “Reframing the Spoiler Debate in Peace Processes.” Pp. 159–177 in Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-War Reconstruction, 2nd Ed., edited by John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  83. Zartman, I. William. 1989. Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Zartman, I. William. 2005. “Analyzing Intractability.” Pp. 47–64 in Grasping the Nettle: Analyzing Cases of.Intractable Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  85. Zartman, I. William, and Victor Kremenyuk (Eds.). 2005. Peace versus Justice: Negotiating Forward-and Backward-Looking Outcomes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Program for the Advancement of Research on Conflict and CollaborationSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations