Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neither Black Nor Box: Ways of Knowing Algorithms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research

Abstract

Bucher uses the concept of the black box as a heuristic device to discuss the nature of algorithms in contemporary media platforms, and how we, as scholars and students interested in this nature, might attend to and study algorithms, despite, or even because of, their seemingly secret nature. The argument is made that despite the usefulness in pointing out some of the epistemological challenges relating to algorithms, the figure of the black box constitutes somewhat of a distraction from other, perhaps more pressing, questions and issues. Moving beyond the notion that algorithms are black boxes, the chapter synthesizes and extends existing approaches and makes a case for using well-known methods to new domains, not only generating knowledge about emerging issues and practices, but contributing to (re)inventing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C. (2013) Towards a Sociology of Computational and Algorithmic Journalism. New Media & Society 15(7): 1005–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (London: Chapman & Hall).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, D. (2009) Power Through the Algorithm? Participatory Web Cultures and the Technological Unconscious. New Media & Society 11(6): 985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2016) The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2012) Want to Be on the Top? Algorithmic Power and the Threat of Invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14(7): 1164–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, W. (2011) Programmed Visions: Software and Memory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colett, S. (2007) Cracking Google’s ‘Secret Sauce’ Algorithm. Available at: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2543807/networking/cracking-google-s-secret-sauce-algorithm.html (accessed 7 December 2015).Crawford, K. (2016) Can an Algorithm be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2016 41(1): 77–92.

  • Diakopoulos, N. (2015) Algorithmic Accountability: Journalistic Investigation of Computational Power Structures. Digital Journalism 3(3): 398–415.Eilam, E. (2005) Reversing: Secrets of Reverse Engineering (Indianapolis: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1961) Fetishism. In J. Strachey (transl.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXI (1927–1931) (London: Hogarth), pp. 147–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. (1994) The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision. Critical Inquiry 21(1): 228–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. (2011) Are Some Things Unrepresentable?, Theory Culture & Society 28(7–8): 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. (2004) Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2014) The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski and K. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 167–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2016) Algorithm. In B. Peters (Ed.), Digital Keywords (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffey, A. (2008) Algorithm. In M. Fuller (Ed.), Software Studies: A Lexicon (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L. (2016) Algorithms, Governance, and Governmentality On Governing Academic Writing. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(1): 17–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaerlein, T. (2013) Playing with Personal Media: On an Epistemology of Ignorance. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 5(4): 651–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppi, T. and Crawford, K. (2015) Social Media, Financial Algorithms and the Hack Crash. Theory, Culture & Society 33(1): 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, W. (1997) From Fetishism to Sincerity: On Agency, the Speaking Subject, and Their Historicity in the Context of Religious Conversion. Comparative Studies in Society and History 39(4): 674–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, J. (2010) EdgeRank: The Secret Sauce That Makes Facebook’s News Feed Tick. TechCrunch 22 April: http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/22/facebook-edgerank (accessed 7 December 2015).

  • Kitchen, R. with following: Kitchin, R. (2016) Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. and Dodge, M. (2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D. (1998) The Art of Computer Programming: Sorting and Searching (Boston: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2010) On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenglet, M. (2011) Conflicting Codes and Codings: How Algorithmic Trading Is Reshaping Financial Regulation. Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A. (2002) Transductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed (London: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N. (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N. and Lezaun, J. (2011) Materials and Devices of the Public: An Introduction. Economy and Society 40(4): 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1 (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, F. (2014) Algorithmic Media Need Democratic Methods: Why Publics Matter. Canadian Journal of Communication 39(4): 597–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montfort, N. (2016) Exploratory Programming for the Arts and Humanities (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. (2014) Automated Media: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Algorithmic Media Production and Consumption. Communication Theory 24(3): 340–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oremus, W. (2014) Facebook’s New Secret Sauce. Slate 24 April: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2014/04/facebook_news_feed_edgerank_facebook_algorithms_facebook_machine_learning.html (accessed 7 December 2015).

  • Pasquale, F. (2015) The Black Box Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pietz, W. (1985) The Problem of the Fetish, I. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 9(Spring): 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietz, W. (1988) The Problem of the Fetish, IIIa: Bosman’s Guinea and the Enlightenment Theory of Fetishism. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 16(Autumn): 105–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, F. (2009) Ethnography Research. In: S. Lapan and M. Quartaroli (Eds.), Research Essentials: An Introduction to Designs and Practices (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass), pp. 203–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, N. (2013) Knowing Algorithms. Working Paper for Media in Transition 8 (Cambridge, MA). Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55eb004ee4b0518639d59d9b/t/55ece1bfe4b030b2e8302e1e/1441587647177/seaverMiT8.pdf (accessed 7 December 2015).

  • Striphas, T. (2010) How to Have Culture in an Algorithmic Age. Available at: http://www.thelateageofprint.org/2010/06/14/how-to-have-culture-in-an-algorithmic-age (accessed 7 December 2015).

  • Surden, H. (2014) Machine Learning and Law. Washington Law Review 89(1): 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z. (2014) Engineering the Public: Big data, Surveillance and Computational Politics. First Monday 19(7): http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4901/4097 (accessed 7 December 2015).

  • Vanhemert, K. (2013) The Secret Sauce Behind Netflix’s Hit, ‘House Of Cards’: Big Data. Co.Design 19 February: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1671893/the-secret-sauce-behind-netflixs-hit-house-of-cards-big-data (accessed 7 December 2015).

  • von Hilgers, P. (2011) The History of the Black Box: The Clash of a Thing and its Concept. Cultural Politics 7(1): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2009) Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1993) Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 18(3): 362–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Taina Bucher

Authors
  1. Taina Bucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taina Bucher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bremen (ZeMKI), Bremen, Germany

    Sebastian Kubitschko

  2. Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden

    Anne Kaun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bucher, T. (2016). Neither Black Nor Box: Ways of Knowing Algorithms. In: Kubitschko, S., Kaun, A. (eds) Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation