Automatic Analysis of Eye-Tracking Data for Augmented Reality Applications: A Prospective Outlook
Eye-tracking technology is becoming easier and cheaper to use, resulting in its increasing application to numerous fields of research. Recent years have seen rapid developments in this area. In light of the foregoing, in the context of Cultural Heritage (CH), the definition of a modern approach to understand how individuals perceive art is challenging. Despite the art perception is highly subjective and variable according to knowledge and experience, more recently, several scientific study and enterprises started to quantify how subjects observe art by the application of the eye-tracking technology. The aim of this study was to understand the visual behaviour of subjects looking at paintings, using eye-tracking technology, in order to define a protocol for optimizing an existing Augmented Reality (AR) application that allows the visualization of digital contents through a display. The stimuli used are three famous paintings preserved at the National Gallery of Marche (Urbino, Marche Region, Italy). We applied eye-tracking to have a deeper understanding of people visual activities in front of these paintings and to analyse how digital contents eventually influence their behaviour. The description of the applied procedure and the preliminary results are presented.
KeywordsAugmented Reality Museums Eye-tracking Behavioural analysis Mobile
We thank our colleagues Ramona Quattrini and Paolo Clini from DICEA Department who provided expertise and materials that greatly assisted the research. We also thank Jacopo Di Girolamo for help in eye-tracking data collection.
- 4.Damala, A., Stojanovic, N.: Tailoring the adaptive augmented reality (A2R) museum visit: identifying cultural heritage professionals’ motivations and needs. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-AMH), pp. 71–80. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
- 6.Dünser, A., Hornecker, E.: Lessons from an ar book study. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 179–182. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Eftaxopoulos, E., Vasilakis, A., Fudos, I.: AR-TagBrowse: annotating and browsing 3D objects on mobile devices. In: Eurographics (Posters), pp. 5–6 (2014)Google Scholar
- 11.Haugstvedt, A.-C., Krogstie, J.: Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: a technology acceptance study. In: ISMAR, pp. 247–255 (2012)Google Scholar
- 13.Kato, H., Billinghurst, M.: Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In: 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality, 1999, (IWAR 1999), Proceedings, pp. 85–94. IEEE (1999)Google Scholar
- 17.Pescarin, S., Wallergird, M., Hupperetz, W., Pagano, A., Ray, C.: Archeovirtual 2011: an evaluation approach to virtual museums. In: 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 25–32. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
- 18.Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Zingaretti, P., Sturari, M., Clini, P., Quattrini, R.: Advanced interaction with paintings by augmented reality and high resolution visualization: a real case exhibition. In: De Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9254, pp. 38–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
- 19.Pierdicca, R., Liciotti, D., Contigiani, M., Frontoni, E., Mancini, A., Zingaretti, P.: Low cost embedded system for increasing retail environment intelligence. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
- 22.Sturari, M., Liciotti, D., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Mancini, A., Contigiani, M., Zingaretti, P.: Robust and affordable retail customer profiling by vision and radio beacon sensor fusion. Pattern Recogn. Lett. (2016, in press)Google Scholar
- 24.Yoshimura, Y., Girardin, F., Carrascal, J.P., Ratti, C., Blat, J.: New tools for studying visitor behaviours in museums: a case study at the louvre. In: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2012, Proceedings of the International Conference Helsingborg (ENTER 2012), pp. 391–402 (2012)Google Scholar