Advertisement

Research the Role of Interactivity on ACG Website Usage Behavior Through Information Search Perspective: A Comparison of Experiential and Goal-Directed Behaviors

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 618)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between three dimensions of interactivity (user control, responsiveness and connectedness) and consumers’ perceived value composed of utilitarian, hedonic and socialness on ACG resources searching, finally determining the level of overall satisfaction on using interactivity features in ACG portable site service. A pilot test to purify the items of questionnaire. And then confirmatory factor analysis will implicate on the second stage for model evaluation and modification.

Keywords

ACG Perceived interactivity Goal-directed Experiential 

1 Introduction

Along with the rapid growth of the Internet, online information search has become a prevalent Internet activity. The Internet is by definition an interactive medium (Rust and Varki 1996). Despite the potential for interactivity provided by the Internet, little attention has been paid to how interactivity might be more fully utilized (Johnson et al. 2006).

Drawing upon the affordances of digital representation of self in ACG website, participants assume the role of social actor in order to problem solve and achieve goals. The social dynamics in ACG website have led to the emergence of a broad range of sociocultural norms and artifacts, social structures and hierarchies, as well as social roles that impact users’ behavior. However, little is known regarding how social behavior emerges within these environments and what factors contribute to such behavior.

ACG products and services are seldom routine purchases (Lee and You 2014). Choices of ACG products usually involve considerable emotional significance and perceived cost risk for the individual. Prior studies investigate factors that affect consumer preferences in online shopping websites. And, seldom distinguish between pre-purchase and post-purchase experiences and tend to focus on post-purchase assessment only. Therefore, this study aimed at the Internet users’ searching behavior, and further probed into users’ socialness of websites satisfaction.

2 Literature Review

2.1 Web Interactivity

Srinivasan et al. (2002, p. 42) operationalize interactivity as the availability and effectiveness of customer support tools on a website, and the degree to which two-way communication with customers is facilitated. Perceived interactivity is measured by user evaluations of the interactivity of the evaluated website using the Measures of Perceived Interactivity (MPI) based on previous researches.

Lee (2005) identified (1) user control, (2) responsiveness, (3) personalization, and (4) connectedness as important components to interactivity in a mobile commerce setting has particular relevance to the current work. We adopt these three components: user control, responsiveness, connectedness, to fit on the website environment. User control refers to the user’s ability to control the information display and content. Responsiveness refers to the site as being able to respond to user queries. Finally, perceived connectedness refers to whether customers share experiences regarding products or services offered with other visitors to the mobile site.

2.2 Consequence of Perceived Interactivity

Users visit websites not only for information, but also for entertainment. Utilitarian performance results from user visiting a site out of necessity rather than for recreation; therefore, this aspect of performance is judged according to whether the particular purpose is accomplished (Davis et al. 1992; Venkatesh 2000).

The hedonic aspect of Web performance is the evaluation of a website based on the assessment by users regarding the amount of fun, playfulness, and pleasure they experience or anticipate from the site. It reflects a website’s entertainment value derived from its sensory attributes, from which users obtain consummatory affective gratification (Batra and Ahtola 1990).

Thus the hypothesis formulate as follow:

Hypothesis 1a. Higher levels of user perceived interactivity will have positive evaluate on perceived utilitarian. Hypothesis 1b. Higher levels of user perceived interactivity will have positive evaluate on perceived hedonic.

Hypothesis 2a. Higher levels of user perceived utilitarian will have positive evaluate on perceived satisfaction. Hypothesis 2b. Higher levels of user perceived hedonic will have positive evaluate on perceived satisfaction.

2.3 Socialness

While B2C Internet sales continue to increase, the rate of increase in online sales is slowing. Bhatnager et al. (2000) argued that positive attitudes toward and acceptance of e-commerce may be inhibited by a lack of product ‘touch’. Jahng et al. (2007) pointed out lack of interaction with a representative from the organization may be the reason, too. Wakefield et al. (2011) found that if websites infused with cues that express familiarity, helpfulness and intelligence (for example) generate a social response from users of the site can leading to greater enjoyment of the website.

Prior research has demonstrated that virtual environments are designed to promote social interaction. Moon (2000) defined social response as people tend to treat computers as social actors even when they know that machines do not possess feelings, intentions, selves, or human motivations. In this study we utilize Moon’s concept of attraction (likeable, friendly, kind, helpful), reciprocity (socially appropriate sequence), intimacy to measure socialness in website interaction. Hypothesis 1c. Higher levels of user perceived interactivity will have positive evaluate on perceived socialness. Hypothesis 2c. Higher levels of user perceived socialness will have positive evaluate on perceived satisfaction.

2.4 Website Satisfaction

Satisfaction is a post-consumption evaluation based on the comparison between the expected value in the pre-consumption stage and the perceived post-consumption value after the purchase or after the use of services or products (Oliver 1981; Ravald and Gröroos 1996). This is especially true for companies selling goods and services on their websites. Customers must be satisfied with their experience with the website or they will not return. Barnes and Vidgen (2002) argues that socialness has a strong association with satisfaction¸ but how about it for ACG users on entertainment information still not clear. Hypothesis 1d. Higher levels of user perceived interactivity will have positive evaluate on perceived satisfaction.

2.5 Internet Users’ Searching Behavior

Product information seeking often is portrayed as a critical early stage in the consumer buying process (Haubl and Trifts 2000).

Novak et al. (2003) drawing nine distinctions between goal-directed and experiential behavior is particularly important in online environments, because the experiential process is, for many individuals, as or even more important than the final instrumental result. Thus we propose hypothesis 1: goal-directed and experiential users have different online searching experience on the same ACG portal site. Hypothesis 3. Goal-directed and experiential users have differences online searching experience on ACG portal site.

3 Method

3.1 Measures

To test the hypothesis, three popular ACG portal sites ranked by alexa were selected in Taiwan. A pilot test was conducted with 148 undergraduate students from vocational universities of north Taiwan. Additionally, the interviewees’ compeers who confirmed to the characteristics of cosplay groups were invited to participate in the questionnaire investigation. Two groups of goal-directed (score ≤ 21) and experiential (score ≥ 27) were differentiated with their reports score of six questions, the sample size of goal-directed is 65 the other one is 83. They all visited three selected ACG websites before.

To analyze the relationship among these variables and examine the fitness of the conceptualized framework, this study conducts Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The questionnaire is designed in Likert 7 point scale and adjusted according to the pilot test. Participants are asked to fill in the questionnaire and indicate their current situation for each variable item (1 = strong disagreement and 7 = strong agreement).

3.2 Model Evaluation and Modification

Based on literature reviewed, a structural equation modeling was conducted to evaluate the fit of the research model (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Research model

4 Item Purification

Some of the measurement items may not be relevant to the scale, hence a “purification” process is needed to identify the effective items by eliminating the relationship between the individual item and the entire scale. The coefficient alpha and the item-to-total correlation for each item were computed, then the items whose item-to-total correlations were low and whose removal increased the coefficient alpha were deleted. In addition, squared multiple correlation for each item, the multiple R2 from the regression analysis with the very item as the dependent variable and all other items as independent variables, was also computed to determine if the item should be deleted due to its low value. Thus, the internal consistency of the set of items was examined.

5 Result

After item purification by pilot test, the questionnaire is proposed as Table 1.
Table 1.

Questionnaire for survey

(1) Online searching experience Items Based on (Novak et al. 2003)

Q1_1. I visit an ACG portal site, most of the reason by my extrinsic motivation or intrinsic motivation Extrinsic or Intrinsic

Q2_1. I visit an ACG portal site, cause of the reason by its instrumental orientation or my ritualized orientation Instrumental or Ritualized

Q3_1. I visit an ACG portal site, cause of the reason by its situational involvement design or my enduring involvement Situational or Enduring

Q4_1. I visit an ACG portal site, cause of the reason by its utilitarian benefits/value or hedonic benefits/value? Utilitarian or Hedonic

Q5_1. I visit an ACG portal site, cause of the reason by my directed search or non-directed browsing?

Directed (pre-purchase) or Non-directed (ongoing) search

Q6_1. I visit an ACG portal site, cause of the reason by its cognitive reason or emotional affect?

Goal-directed choice or Navigational choice

Construct

Question

(2) User Control

UCL1. I was in control over the content of this website that I wanted to see

UCL2. I was in control over the information display format, condition when using this website

UCL3. I was in control over the order of this web pages that I wanted to browse

UCL4. I was in control over the personal homepage of this web site for my revisit next time

UCL5. I was in control over the clips sharing what I want

(3) Responsiveness

RES1. The information shown when I interacted with the site was relevant

RES2. The information shown when I interacted with the site was appropriate

RES3. The information shown when I interacted with the site met my expectations

RES4. The information shown when I interacted with the site was useful

RES5. The information feedback instantly when I interacted with the site

(4) Connectedness

CON1. Customers share experiences about the product or service with other customers of this website

CON2. Customers of this website benefit from the community visiting the website

CON3. Customers share a common bond with other members of the customer community visiting the website

CON4. Customers share opinions from the video annotation tool of this website

CON5. Customers affect wider searching from the online discuss of this website

(5) Utilitarian

UTI1. I accomplished just what I wanted to do on this searching trip

UTI2. While searching, I found just the item(s) I was looking for

UTI3. While searching, I found the information update instantly

UTI4. The rankings I found has significant influence

(6) Hedonic

HED1. I continued to search online, not because I had to, but because I wanted to

HED2. During online searching, I felt the excitement of the hunt

HED3. During online searching, I was able to forget my problems

HED4. The community discussions I found were interesting

(7) Socialness

SOL1. Attraction/likeable

SOL2. Attraction/friendly

SOL3. Attraction/kind

SOL4. Attraction/likeable,

SOL5. Reciprocity (socially appropriate sequence),

SOL6. Intimacy

(8) Satisfaction (Based on Yoo et al. 2010)

SAT1. Overall of this website searching was good decision

SAT2. Overall of this website searching was satisfying

SAT3. Overall of this website searching was enjoyable

SAT4. Overall of this website searching was easy to find information

SAT5. Overall of this website service was satisfying

References

  1. Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., Griffen, M.: Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Behav. 20, 644–656 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, S.J., Vidgen, R.T.: An integrative approach to the assessment of ecommerce. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 3(3), 114–126 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Batra, R., Ahtola, O.: Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian sources of consumer attitude. Mark. Lett. 2(2), 159–170 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. Bhatnager, A., Misra, S., Rao, H.R.: On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior. Commun. ACM 43(11), 98–107 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch, P.H., Richens, M.L.: Shopping without purchase: an investigation of consumer browsing behavior. In: Bagozzi, R.P., Tybout, A.M. (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 10, pp. 389–393. Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 1111–1132 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. Moon, Y.: Intimate exchanges: using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. J. Consum. Res. 26, 323–339 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., Duhachek, A.: The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. J. Consum. Psychol. 13(1-2), 3–16 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hancock, G.R., Nevitt, J.: Bootstrapping and the identification of exogenous latent variables within structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model. 6, 394–399 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haubl, G., Trifts, V.: Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: the effects of interactive decision aids. Mark. Sci. 19(1), 4–21 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Hirschman, E.: Experience seeking: a subjectivist perspective of consumption. J. Bus. Res. 12, 115–136 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jahng, J., Jain, H., Ramamurthy, K.: Effects of interaction richness on consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions in e-commerce: some experimental results. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16(3), 254–270 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, G.J., Bruner, G.C., Kumar, A.: Interactivity and its facets revisited. J. Advertising, 35(4), 35–52 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Lee, J., You, M.: The role of interactivity in information search on ACG portal site. In: Nah, F.F.-H. (ed.) HCIB/HCII 2014. LNCS, vol. 8527, pp. 194–205. Springer, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  16. Lee, T.: The impact of perceptions of interactivity on customer trust and transaction intentions in mobile commerce. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 6(3), 165–180 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. McMillan, S.J.: The researchers and the concept: moving beyond a blind examination of interactivity. J. Interact. Advertising 5(1) (2005). http://jiad.org Google Scholar
  18. Oliver, R.L.: Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retail settings. J. Retail. 57(3), 25–48 (1981)Google Scholar
  19. Ravald, A., Gröroos, C.: The value concept and relationship marketing. Eur. J. Mark. 30(2), 19–30 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowley, J.: Product search in e-shopping: a review and research propositions. J. Consum. Mark. 17(1), 20–35 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rust, R.T., Varki, S.: Rising from the ashes of advertising. J. Bus. Res. 37(3), 173–191 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. Sangani, K.: Otaku world. Eng. Technol. 3, 94–95 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schlosser, A.E., Kanfer, A.: Interactivity in Commercial Web Sites: Implications for Web Site Effectiveness. Working Paper, Vanderbilt University (1999)Google Scholar
  24. Srinivasan, S.S., Anderson, R., Ponnavolu, K.: Customer loyalty in ecommerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. J. Retail. 78(1), 41–50, Spring 2002Google Scholar
  25. Stromer-Galley, J.: Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. J. Commun. 50(4), 111–132 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioural control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Infor. Syst. Res. 11, 342–365 (2000)Google Scholar
  27. Wakefield, R.L., Wakefield, K.L., Baker, J., Wang, L.C.: How website socialness leads to website use. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 20(1), 118–132 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoo, W.S., Lee, Y., Park, J.: The role of interactivity in e-tailing: creating value and increasing satisfaction. J. Retail. Consum. Ser. 17 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Digital Multimedia DesignChina University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations