Skip to main content

When Human Visual Performance Is Imperfect—How to Optimize the Collaboration Between One Human Operator and Multiple Field Robots

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends in Control and Decision-Making for Human–Robot Collaboration Systems
  • 2377 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider a robotic field exploration and classification task where the field robots have a limited communication with a remote human operator, and also have constrained motion energy budgets. We then extend our previously proposed paradigm for human–robot collaboration (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446, 2015 [4]), (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, 2016 [5]) to the case of multiple robots. In this paradigm, the robots predict human visual performance , which is not necessarily perfect, and optimize seeking help from humans accordingly (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446, 2015 [4]), (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, 2016 [5]. More specifically, given a probabilistic model of human visual performance from (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446, 2015 [4]), in this chapter we show how multiple robots can properly optimize motion, sensing, and seeking help. We mathematically and numerically analyze the properties of robots’ optimum decisions, in terms of when to ask humans for help, when to rely on their own judgment and when to gather more information from the field. Our theoretical results shed light on the properties of the optimum solution. Moreover, simulation results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach and confirm that it can save resources considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that robot \(k_1\) and robot \(k_2\) can be the same robot or two different robots.

  2. 2.

    This lemma is similar to the second condition of Lemma 12.1 of our previous work [4] as it concerns only one robot.

  3. 3.

    Bandwidth usage is taken proportional to the number of questions.

References

  1. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2009) Convex Optimization. Cambridge university press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Branson S, Wah C, Schroff F, Babenko B, Welinder P, Perona P, Belongie S (2010) Visual recognition with humans in the loop. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision, pp 438–451

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke J, Murphy R, Coovert M, Riddle D (2004) Moonlight in miami: field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1–2):85–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai H, Mostofi Y (2015) To ask or not to ask: a foundation for the optimization of human-robot collaborations. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cai H, Mostofi Y (2016) Asking for help with the right question by predicting human performance. In: Proceedings of robotics: science and systems

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cai H, Mostofi Y (2016) A human-robot collaborative traveling salesman problem: robotic site inspection with human assistance. In: Proceedings of the American control conference

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao M, Stewart A, Leonard N (2008) Integrating human and robot decision-making dynamics with feedback: models and convergence analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1127–1132

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chipalkatty R (2012) Human-in-the-loop control for cooperative human-robot tasks. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dantzig GB (1957) Discrete-variable extremum problems. Oper Res 5(2):266–288

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dias MB, Kannan B, Browning B, Jones E, Argall B, Dias MF, Zinck M, Veloso M, Stentz A (2008) Sliding autonomy for peer-to-peer human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent autonomous systems, pp 332–341

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack problems: algorithms and computer implementations. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Meriçli Ç, Veloso M, Akin H (2011) Task refinement for autonomous robots using complementary corrective human feedback. Int J Adv Robot Syst 8(2):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srivastava V (2012) Stochastic search and surveillance strategies for mixed human-robot teams. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart A, Cao M, Nedic A, Tomlin D, Leonard N (2012) Towards human-robot teams: model-based analysis of human decision making in two-alternative choice tasks with social feedback. Proc IEEE 100(3):751–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Toris R, Suay H, Chernova S (2012) A practical comparison of three robot learning from demonstration algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 261–262

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by NSF NeTS award #1321171 and NSF RI award #1619376.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cai, H., Mostofi, Y. (2017). When Human Visual Performance Is Imperfect—How to Optimize the Collaboration Between One Human Operator and Multiple Field Robots. In: Wang, Y., Zhang, F. (eds) Trends in Control and Decision-Making for Human–Robot Collaboration Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40532-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40533-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics