Skip to main content

Distinguishing Features of Praxeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1034 Accesses

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

In the above, it has been shown that the praxeologist as a social scientist looks for those elements that drive individual action and thereby social structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hence the essential difference between the natural and social sciences is “that in the natural sciences the process of deduction has to start from some hypothesis which is the result of inductive generalizations, while in the social sciences it starts directly from known empirical elements and uses them to find the regularities in the complex phenomena which direct observations cannot establish” (von Hayek 1957, p. 126).

  2. 2.

    It may be mentioned in this context that although Praxeology is founded upon the notions of value and preference, it does not deal with why people have the values that drives them toward particular choices and actions. That is, theories of praxeology concern “the endeavor to reach a goal by the use of means,” but not causal explanation of psychological drives involved or ethical evaluation of means and ends (Mises 1990c, p. 9). Rather, it deals rather with the fact that they choose and act “in compliance with a choice made” (Mises 2007, p. 271). Hence, it may be said that Praxeology itself is conceptual and deals in universals and categories, and does not provide a complete explanation for specific events alone. Rather, its theorems may be employed for such a purpose by employing assumptions (Mises 1996, p. 51). For example, the perceived disutility of labor and other psychological assumptions are important in Praxeology and the Praxeologist needs to be familiar with the empirical support for assumptions that he incorporates in his theorems. However, it does not aim to explain them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terje Andreas Tonsberg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tonsberg, T.A., Henderson, J.S. (2016). Distinguishing Features of Praxeology. In: Understanding Leadership in Complex Systems. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40445-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics