Skip to main content

Scholar: A Scholar Who Cannot See the Woods for the Trees: The Biopsychosocial Model as the Scientific Basis for the Psychosomatic Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bio-Psycho-Social Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

The International Society for Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISPOG) advocates a broad approach to O&G as a discipline. In this context breadth means paying attention to the role played by biological, psychological, and social factors in the illness and health of gynecological patients. This broad perspective is in contrast with the biomedical model, which is common in Western medicine; the biomedical model is first and foremost a depth perspective, which reduces illness to a problem in underlying biological processes. George L. Engel coined the term “biopsychosocial model” (BPS model) in 1977 to refer to a combination of zooming both in and out in relation to health issues. The BPS model is a way of thinking that helps to understand complex health problems and complaints without ignoring the influence and importance of biomedical, personal, and social factors. In principle, in this book we use the BPS model as a point of departure. The advantage of working with the BPS model is that you not only find out how things work—the depth perspective—but also gain an understanding of the meaning of a certain complaint or symptom, why a certain phenomenon exists. In this chapter we will take a closer look at the incongruence between the breadth perspective and the depth perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dellemann ORJ. Towards an integral psychiatry. PhD Thesis. Universiteit voor Humanistiek, Utrecht; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Korzybski A. A non-aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics. Sci Sanity. 1933;747–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Popper K. The tanner lecture on human values. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Regier DA, First M. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) classification of mental disorders: strengths, limitations and perspectives. In: Maj M, Gaebel W, editors. Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

To a significant extent, this chapter was inspired by and is based on “Towards an Integral Psychiatry,” a PhD thesis by O. R. J. Dellemann (Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit voor Humanistiek; 2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry B. M. van de Wiel PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Wiel, H.B.M., Paarlberg, K.M. (2017). Scholar: A Scholar Who Cannot See the Woods for the Trees: The Biopsychosocial Model as the Scientific Basis for the Psychosomatic Approach. In: Paarlberg, K., van de Wiel, H. (eds) Bio-Psycho-Social Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40404-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40404-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40402-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40404-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics