Skip to main content

A Couple Who Considers Artificial Reproductive Techniques: Psychosocially Informed Care in Reproductive Medicine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bio-Psycho-Social Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Infertility and its treatments, collectively known as assisted reproductive technology (ART), are psychologically demanding life experiences. Fertility difficulties often result in feelings of sadness, guilt, emptiness, and social isolation among women and men. Treatments with ART are physically demanding, at least for the woman, and accompanied by successive feelings of hope and despair, which is exacerbated when several treatment cycles are undertaken. Psychological distress is compounded by uncertainty about treatment success and the low chance of a live birth. Particular phases of treatment are associated with especially heightened needs for emotional support. Some couples may need assistance to reach a decision to cease treatment if it continues to be unsuccessful. Good clinical practice for infertility and ART clinicians involves much more than the essential biomedical and technical competence. Psychosocially informed care requires a set of acquired skills that promotes patients’ wellbeing and includes empathy, honesty, respect, effective communication, nonjudgmental language, patient involvement, and emotional support. Infertility and ART clinical care can be psychologically challenging work. Multidisciplinary team approaches to clinical practice (pro)mote clinicians’ wellbeing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson D, De Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (icmart) and the world health organization (who) revised glossary on art terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dancet EAF, Van Empel IW, Rober P, Nelen WL, Kremer JAM, D’Hooghe TM. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient’s voice. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(4):827–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg BJ, Wilson JF. Psychiatric morbidity in the infertile population: a reconceptualization. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(4):654–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greil A, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32(1):140–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher J, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rockliff HE, Lightman SL, Rhidian E, Buchanan H, Gordon U, Vedhara K. A systematic review of psychosocial factors associated with emotional adjustment in in vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):594–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman RJ. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:8–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. New debate: what is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the best endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):3–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lautenbach DM, Christensen KD, Sparks JA, Green RC. Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14(1):491–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 2011;342:d223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):330–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJC, Heijnen EM, Broekmans FJ, De Klerk C, Fauser BC, et al. Why do couples drop-out from ivf treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):2050–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AW, Kremer JAM, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DD. Women’s emotional adjustment to ivf: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):27–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Rowe BSc (Hons), PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowe, H., Fisher, J., Hammarberg, K. (2017). A Couple Who Considers Artificial Reproductive Techniques: Psychosocially Informed Care in Reproductive Medicine. In: Paarlberg, K., van de Wiel, H. (eds) Bio-Psycho-Social Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40404-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40404-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40402-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40404-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics