Abstract
Infertility and its treatments, collectively known as assisted reproductive technology (ART), are psychologically demanding life experiences. Fertility difficulties often result in feelings of sadness, guilt, emptiness, and social isolation among women and men. Treatments with ART are physically demanding, at least for the woman, and accompanied by successive feelings of hope and despair, which is exacerbated when several treatment cycles are undertaken. Psychological distress is compounded by uncertainty about treatment success and the low chance of a live birth. Particular phases of treatment are associated with especially heightened needs for emotional support. Some couples may need assistance to reach a decision to cease treatment if it continues to be unsuccessful. Good clinical practice for infertility and ART clinicians involves much more than the essential biomedical and technical competence. Psychosocially informed care requires a set of acquired skills that promotes patients’ wellbeing and includes empathy, honesty, respect, effective communication, nonjudgmental language, patient involvement, and emotional support. Infertility and ART clinical care can be psychologically challenging work. Multidisciplinary team approaches to clinical practice (pro)mote clinicians’ wellbeing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson D, De Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (icmart) and the world health organization (who) revised glossary on art terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.
Dancet EAF, Van Empel IW, Rober P, Nelen WL, Kremer JAM, D’Hooghe TM. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient’s voice. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(4):827–33.
Berg BJ, Wilson JF. Psychiatric morbidity in the infertile population: a reconceptualization. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(4):654–61.
Greil A, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32(1):140–62.
Fisher J, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:121–9.
Rockliff HE, Lightman SL, Rhidian E, Buchanan H, Gordon U, Vedhara K. A systematic review of psychosocial factors associated with emotional adjustment in in vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):594–613.
Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman RJ. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:8–20.
Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. New debate: what is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the best endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):3–7.
Lautenbach DM, Christensen KD, Sparks JA, Green RC. Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14(1):491–513.
Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 2011;342:d223.
Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):330–53.
Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJC, Heijnen EM, Broekmans FJ, De Klerk C, Fauser BC, et al. Why do couples drop-out from ivf treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):2050–5.
Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AW, Kremer JAM, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DD. Women’s emotional adjustment to ivf: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):27–36.
Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowe, H., Fisher, J., Hammarberg, K. (2017). A Couple Who Considers Artificial Reproductive Techniques: Psychosocially Informed Care in Reproductive Medicine. In: Paarlberg, K., van de Wiel, H. (eds) Bio-Psycho-Social Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40404-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40404-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40402-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40404-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)