How to Improve Research Data Management

The Case of Sciebo (Science Box)
  • Konstantin WilmsEmail author
  • Christian Meske
  • Stefan Stieglitz
  • Dominik Rudolph
  • Raimund Vogl
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9735)


The digitalization of research processes has led to a vast amount of data. Since third-party funding institutions progressively set standards and requirements regarding the handling of such data, research data management has become important in the context of international research collaboration projects. Simultaneously, adequate collaboration systems are needed to support scientists in this context. In this paper we discuss existing standards for research data management in the context of third-party funding and how cloud technology could support the fulfillment of existing provisions.


Cloud computing Usability Research data management Technology adoption 


  1. 1.
    Amorim, R.C., Castro, J.A., de Silva, J.R., Ribeiro, C.: A comparative study of platforms for research data management: interoperability, metadata capabilities and integration potential. In: Rocha, A., Correia, A.M., Costanzo, S., Reis, L.P. (eds.) New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. AISC, vol. 353, pp. 101–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer, B., Ferus, A., Gorraiz, J., Gründhammer, V., Gumpenberger, C., Maly, N., Mühlegger, J. M., Preza, J. L., Sánchez Solís, B., Schmidt, N., Steineder, C.: Forschende und ihre Daten. Ergebnisse einer österreichweiten Befra-gung−Report 2015. Version 1.2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ball, R., Wiederkehr, S. (eds.) Vernetztes Wissen. Online. Die Bibliothek als Managementaufgabe: Festschrift für Wolfram Neubauer zum 65. Geburtstag. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benson, D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J., Wheeler, D.L.: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(1), D25–D30 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bukavova, H.: Supporting the initiation of research collaborations. In: Jena Research Papers in Business and Economics, vol. 64 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Commission, E.: Guidelines on open access to scientific publications and research data in horizon 2020. Technical report (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., Woollard, M.: Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice. Sage Publications Ltd, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    da Silva, J.R., Barbosa, J.P., Gouveia, M., Ribeiro, C., Lopes, J.C.: UPBox and DataNotes: a collaborative data management environment for the long tail of research data. In: iPRESS2013: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects, Lisbon, Portugal (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Easterbrook, P.J., et al.: Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337(8746), 867–872 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feijen, M.: What Researchers Want. SURF-foundation, Utrecht (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hager, R., Hildmann, T., Bittner, P.: Ein Jahr mit ownCloud – von der Planung bis zur Neustrukturierung. In: Kao, O., Hildmann, T. (eds.) Cloudspeicher im Hochschuleinsatz: Proceedings der Tagung “Cloudspeicher im Hochschuleinsatz” am 05. und 06. Mai 2014 am IT-Service-Center (tubIT) der Technischen Universität Berlin, Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hilber, M., Reintzsch, D.: Cloud Computing und Open Source-Wie groß ist die Gefahr des Copyleft bei SaaS? Comput. Und Recht: Forum für die Praxis des Rechts der Datenverargeitung, Inf. und Autom. 30(11), 697–702 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hildmann, T., Kao, O.: Deploying and extending on-premise cloud storage based on ownCloud. In: 2014 IEEE 34th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johns Hopkins University. Accessed 4 Mar 2009
  15. 15.
    Joshi, M., Krag, S.S.: Issues in data management. In: Spier, R.E., Bird, S.J. (eds.) Science and Engineering Ethics, vol 16:4, pp. 743–748. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Library Trends, vol. 57:2, pp. 191−201. Johns Hopkins University Press, Illinois (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lyon, L.: Dealing with Data: Roles, Rights, Responsibilities and Relationships. Consultancy Report (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meske, C., Brockmann, T., Wilms, K., Stieglitz, S.: Gamify employee collaboration – a critical review of gamification elements in social software. In: ACIS (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nature Journal. Authors & Referees, Editorial Policies, Availability of data & materials. Accessed 4 Mar 2009
  20. 20.
    ‘New advice for universities in light of the Climate Change Emails Review’ JISC news release July 2010.
  21. 21.
    Palmer, C.L., Cragin, M.H., Heidorn, P.B., Smith, L.C.: Data curation for the long tail of science: the case of environmental sciences. In: Third International Digital Curation Conference, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peterson, M., Zasman, G., Mojica, P., Porter, J.: 100 year archive requirements survey. In: SNIA’s Data Management Forum, p.1. SNIA (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piwowar, H.A., Day, R.S., Fridsma, D.B.: Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE 2(3), e308 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Savage, C.J., Vickers, A.J.: Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PloS journals. PLoS ONE 4(9), e7078 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sayogo, D.S., Pardo, T.A.: Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: understanding the motivation to publish research data. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 19–31 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schlitter, N., Yasnogorbw, A.: Sync&Share: a cloud solution for academia in the state of Baden-Württemberg. In: Kao, O., Hildmann, T. (eds.) Cloudspeicher im Hochschuleinsatz: Proceedings der Tagung “Cloudspeicher im Hochschuleinsatz” am 05. und 06. Mai 2014 am IT-Service-Center (tubIT) der Technischen Universität Berlin, Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Science Magazine. General Information for Authors. Conditions of Acceptance. Accessed 4 Mar 2009
  28. 28.
    Stieglitz, S., Meske, C., Vogl, R., Rudolph, D.: Demand for cloud services as an infrastructure in higher education. In: Icis (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suresh, S.: Biography. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  30. 30.
    Vogl, R., Angenent, H., Bockholt, R., Rudolph, D., Stieglitz, S., Meske, C.: Designing a large scale cooperative sync&share cloud storage plattform for the academic community in Northrhine-Westfalia. In: Proceedings of EUNIS 2013 Congress 1(1), (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vogl, R., Rudolph, D., Thoring, A., Angenent, H., Stieglitz, S., Meske, C.: How to build a cloud storage service for half a million users in higher education: challenges met and solutions found. In: HICCS 2016 Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 5328−5337 (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Voorbrood, C.M. Voer voor psychologen. Archivering, beschikbaarstelling en hergebruik van onderzoeksdata in de psychologie, Aksant Academic Publishers (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Whyte, A., Tedd, J.: Making the case for research data management. Digitar curation centre, edinburgh (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Witt, M.: Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment. In: Library Trends, vol 57:2, pp. 191–201. John Hopkins University Press and the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Illinois (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantin Wilms
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian Meske
    • 1
  • Stefan Stieglitz
    • 1
  • Dominik Rudolph
    • 2
  • Raimund Vogl
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive ScienceUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.ZIV-Centre for Applied Information TechnologyUniversity of MuensterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations