Advertisement

Wireless Network Virtualization: Opportunities for Spectrum Sharing in the 3.5 GHz Band

  • Marcela M. GomezEmail author
  • Martin B. H. WeissEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 172)

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the opportunities that Wireless Network Virtualization (WNV) can bring for spectrum sharing by focusing on the regulatory framework that has been deployed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for the 3.5 GHz band. We pair this innovative regulatory approach with another novel arrangement, Wireless Network Virtualization, and thus assess the resulting opportunities from the perspectives of regulation, technology and economics. To this end, we have established a comprehensive foundation for further exploration and development of virtualized networks that would provide significant opportunities for enabling and enhancing current sharing arrangements.

Keywords

Wireless Network Virtualization Spectrum sharing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant 1443796.

References

  1. 1.
    Leibovitz, J.: Breaking down barriers to innovation in the 3.5 GHz band (2015). https://www.fcc.gov/blog/breaking-down-barriers-innovation-35-ghz-band
  2. 2.
    FCC: Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. In the matter of the Commission’s rules with regard to commercial operations in the 3550–3650 MHz band (2015). https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-47A1.pdf
  3. 3.
    Marshall, P.: Spectrum Access System: Managing three tiers of users in the 3550–3700 MHz band. http://wireless.fcc.gov/workshops/sas_01-14-2014/panel-1/Marshall-Google.pdf
  4. 4.
    Wang, A., Iyer, M., Dutta, R., Rouskas, G.N., Baldine, I.: Network virtualization: technologies, perspectives, and frontiers. J. Lightwave Tech. 31(4), 523–537 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wen, H., Tiwary, P.K., Le-Ngoc, T.: Wireless Virtualization. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaki, Y., Zhao, L., Goerg, C., Timm-Giel, A.: LTE mobile network virtualization. Mob. Netw. Appl. 16(4), 424–432 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gomez, M.M., Cui, L., Weiss, M.B.H.: Trading wireless capacity through spectrum virtualization using LTE-A. TPRC Conf. Paper (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panchal, J.S., Yates, R., Buddhikot, M.M.: Mobile network resource sharing options: performance comparisons. IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm. 12(9), 4470–4482 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forde, T.K., Macaluso, I., Doyle, L.: Exclusive sharing and virtualization of the cellular network. In: New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forde, T., Doyle, L.: Cellular clouds. Telecom. Policy 37(2–3), 194–207 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiss, T.A., Jondral, F.K.: Spectrum pooling: an innovative strategy for the enhancement of spectrum efficiency. IEEE Comm. Mag. 42(3), S8–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doyle, L., Kibilda, J., Forde, T.K., DaSilva, L.: Spectrum without bounds, networks without borders. Proc. IEEE. 102(3), 351–365 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hua, S., Liu, P., Panwar, S.S.: The urge to merge: when cellular service providers pool capacity. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hagel, J., Brown, J.S.: The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, J.S., Hagel, J.: The next frontier of innovation. McKinsey Q. 3, 82–91 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baranes, E., Bourreau, M.: An economist’s guide to local loop unbundling. Comm. Strat. 57, 13 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bourreau, M., Doğan, P.: Service-based vs. facility-based competition in local access networks. Info. Economics and Policy 16(2), 287–306 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cave, M.: Snakes and ladders: unbundling in a next generation world. Telecom. Policy. 34(1), 80–85 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garrone, P., Zaccagnino, M.: Seeking the links between competition and telecommunications investments. Telecom. Policy 39(5), 388–405 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, F., Whalley, J.: Deconstruction of the telecommunications industry: from value chains to value networks. Telecom. Policy 26(9), 451–472 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peppard, J., Rylander, A.: From value chain to value network: insights for mobile operators. Eur. Manage. J. 24(2), 128–141 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cui, L., Gomez, M.M., Weiss, M.B.H.: Dimensions of cooperative spectrum sharing: rights and enforcement. In: New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ostrom, E.: Polycentric systems as one approach for solving collective-action problems. Indiana University, Bloomington: School of Public & Environmental Affairs Research Paper. no. 2008-11 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weiss, M.B.H., Lehr, W., Acker, A., Gomez, M.M.: Socio-technical considerations for Spectrum Access System (SAS) design. In: IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN) (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information SciencesUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations