Autopathographies in New Media Environments at the Turn of the 21st Century

  • Tamar Tembeck


The author attends to points of departure and continuity between literary autopathographies—autobiographical accounts of illness—and autopathographies produced in new media environments at the turn of the 21st century. Following an overview of early online autopathographic practices, the author engages in close readings of two artistic autopathographies rendered in digital media: Donald G. Rodney’s AUTOICON (2000) and Hannah Wilke’s Intra-Venus Tapes (1990–1993/2007). With these artworks positioned as “database autopathographies,” distinct forms of narrative and temporality are seen to play out in their reception. The comparison of diverse modes of autopathographic production allows an assessment of the extent to which and in what respects the passage from literature to artistic and new media environments entails an expansion of the autopathographic genre.


Media Environment Life Plan Audio Clip Online Support Group Illness Narrative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Brody, Howard. 1987. Stories of sickness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brophy, Sarah. 2004. Witnessing AIDS: Writing, testimony, and the work of mourning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bury, Michael. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness 4(2): 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia, Yvonne Hunt, Anna Folkers, and Erik Augustson. 2011. Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: A narrative analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13 (1): e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Couser, G. Thomas. 1997. Recovering bodies: Illness, disability, and life-writing. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  6. Diedrich, Lisa. 2007. Treatments: Language, politics, and the culture of illness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Frank, Arthur W. 1995. The wounded storyteller: The body, illness, ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2002. At the will of the body: Reflections on illness. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  9. Goddard, Donald. 2007a. Hannah Wilke: IntraVenus T apes, 1990–1993, press release. New York: Ronald Feldman Fine Arts.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2007b. Unpublished description of Intra-Venus Tapes.Google Scholar
  11. Goldman, Saundra. 2006. Heresies and history: Hannah Wilke and the American Feminist art movement. In Hannah Wilke: Exchange values, 159–162. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Artium, Centro-Museo Vasco de Arte Contemporáneo.Google Scholar
  12. Hardey, Michael. 2004. Digital life stories: Auto/biography in the information age. Auto/Biography 12: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2005. Writing digital selves: Narratives of health and illness on the internet. In Representing health: Discourses of health and illness in the media, eds. Martin King and Katherine Watson, 133–155. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Hawkins, Anne Hunsaker. 1998. Reconstructing illness: Studies in pathography. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hayles, N. Katherine. 2012. How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heilferty, Catherine McGeehin. 2012. ‘An internet family’: Online communication during childhood cancer. In Produsing theory in a digital world, ed. Rebecca Ann Lind, 159–176. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Iniva: Institute of International Visual Arts. 2000a. AutoIcon. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.
  18. ———. 2000b. Autoicon. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.
  19. Jones, Amelia. 1998. The rhetoric of the pose: Hannah Wilke and the radical narcissism of feminist body art. In Body art: Performing the subject, 151–195. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2002. The ‘eternal return’: Self-portrait photography as a technology of embodiment. Signs 27(4): 947–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleinman, Arthur. 1988. The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Kochheiser, Thomas H., ed. 1989. Hannah Wilke: A retrospective. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
  23. Manovich, Lev. 2000. The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Page, Ruth E. 2012. Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Tembeck, Tamar. 2009. Performative autopathographies: Self-representations of physical illness in contemporary art, PhD dissertation. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2011. Giving form to pathos? On the articulation of suffering experience in non-verbal (auto)pathographies. In An den Grenzen der Sprache [At the limits of language], eds. Peter Holzer, Manfred Kienpointer, Julia Pröll, and Ulla Ratheiser, 85–99. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———, ed. 2014. Auto/pathographies. Alma: Sagamie édition d’art.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2016. Selfies of ill health: Online autopathographic photography and the dramaturgy of the everyday. Social Media + Society 2 (1). DOI: 10.1177/ 2056305116641343.
  30. Vesna, Victoria, ed. 2007. Database aesthetics: Art in the age of information overflow. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  31. Weinbren, Grahame. 2007. Ocean, database, recut. In Database aesthetics: Art in the age of information overflow, ed. Victoria Vesna, 61–85. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wilke, Hannah. 1995. Intra-Venus [exhibition catalog]. New York: Ronald Feldman Fine Arts.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, Simon J. 2003. Medicine and the body. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamar Tembeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Media@McGill Department of Art History and Communication StudiesMcGill UniversityMontreal, QCCanada

Personalised recommendations