Skip to main content

Writing as Speaking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover We Only Talk Feminist Here

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education ((GED))

  • 626 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we explore the methodological underpinnings of this book and ask how do we do feminist research which works towards the gender just society we hope for? Here we ground our work in the writings of Hélène Cixous and Sara Ahmed, two different women writing at different times in different places but arguably searching for ways to work within/against the in-between-ness of women’s experiences. Drawing on Cixous’ écriture féminine as a ‘willful’ methodological approach (after Ahmed, Willful subjects. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014) allows us to reconsider what constitutes knowledge, research practice and ultimately power that opens up a space for the reception of feminist academic voices. It makes room for us to consider writing as speaking ‘other than patriarchy’, that it is to speak and write like feminists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, L., & Lury, C. (Eds.) (2012). Measure and value. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010). Forward. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2015). Living the neoliberal university. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 258–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banting, P. (1992). The body as pictogram: Rethinking Hélène Cixous’s écriture féminine. Textual Practice, 6(2), 225–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, I. (2004). Hélène Cixous: Live theory. New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (1991). Patterns of dissonance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (2 ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, A. (2004). Hélène Cixous: Writing and sexual difference. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs, 1(4), 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H. (1991). Coming to writing and other essays. In S. Suleiman, (Ed.) and S. Cornell, (trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous H. (1994). In S. Sellers (ed.) The Hélène Cixous Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H. (1997). Sorties: out and out: attacks/ways out/forays. In A. D. Schrift (Ed.), The logic of the gift: Toward and ethic of generosity. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H., & Calle-Gruber, M. (1997). Rootprints: Memory and life writing (E. Prenowitz trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H., & Clement, C. (1986). The newly born woman. Minneapolis, MS: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2014). Feminist scholarship and the public realm in postcolonial Australia. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(80), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo, D., & Massaro, V. A. (2016). Boundary-making in feminist research: New methodologies for ‘intimate insiders’. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(1), 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M. (2014). Feminism, gender and universities: Politics passions and pedagogies. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1997). What’s a nice girl like you doing in a place like this? The ambivalences of professional feminism. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Knowing feminisms. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., Cixous, H., Armel, A., & Thompson, A. (2006). From the word to life: A dialogue between Jacques Derrida and Hélène Cixous. New Literary History, 37(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, M. (Ed.) (1996). Feminist literary theory: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, MA: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., Boden, R., & Kenway, J. (2007). Teaching and supervision. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, B. ([1991] 2002). The word burners. North Melbourne, VIC: Spinifex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotaki, M. (2013). No woman is like a man (in academia): The masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1251–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S. (1991). Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In M. di Leonardo (Ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist anthropology in the postmodern era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatens, M. (1992). Power, bodies and difference. In M. Barrett & A. Phillips (Eds.), Destabilising theory (pp. 120–137). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of the Neoliberal University. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, K. (2010). Calling all sisters: Continental philosophy and black feminist thinkers. In M. Guadalupe Davidson, K. T. R. Gines, & D. L. Marcano (Eds.), Convergences: Black feminism and continental philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. (2003). Whitestream feminism and the colonialist project. Educational Theory, 53(3), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1994). Postmodernism and the crisis of representation. English Education, 26(4), 206–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (2010b). The untimeliness of feminist theory. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18(1), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouseTM: Feminism and Technoscience. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpfl, H. (2000). The suffering mother and the miserable son: Organizing women and organising women’s writing. Gender, Work, and Organization, 7(2), 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman Jones, S. (1998). Kaleidoscope notes: Writing women’s music and organizational culture. Walnut Creek, MA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, J. (1998). Are all the women white? In J. Huggins (Ed.), Sister girl: The writings of Aboriginal activist and historian. St. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1985). The sex which is not one. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2012a). Fiction and the feminist academic novel. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 516–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2012b). Low-fat love. Dordrecht: SensePublishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2015). Blue. Dordrecht: SensePublishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, S. (2012). Medusa’s laughter and the hows and whys of writing according to Hélène Cixous. In M. Livholts (Ed.), Emergent writing methodologies in feminist studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livholts, M. (ed) (2012). Emergent writing methodologies in feminist studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, M. (2012). Anecdote. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ up to the white woman: Aboriginal women and feminism. St. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (2014). Re-writing corporate environmentalism: Ecofeminism, corporeality and the language of feeling. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(5), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Writing organisation as gendered practice: Interrupting the libidinal economy. Organization Studies, 35(3), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, E. S. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, T., & Price, J. (1995). Out of the blood and spirit of our lives: The place of the body in academic feminism. In L. Morley & V. Walsh (Eds.), Feminist academics: Creative agents for change. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. (1981). Language and the vision of a Lesbian-Feminist Utopia in Wittig’s “Les Guérillères”. Frontiers, 6(1), 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M., & Price, J. (1996). Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body and Society, 2(4), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2014). Value beyond value? Is anything beyond the logic of Capital? The British Journal of Sociology, 65(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1997). Knowing feminisms. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2011). The intimate insider: Negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, K. (2006). French feminisms ecriture feminine. In E. Rooney (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to feminist literary theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S., & Stanley, L. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, V. ([1942] 1992). Professions for women. In D. Bradshaw (Ed.), Virginia Woolf: Selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lipton, B., Mackinlay, E. (2017). Writing as Speaking. In: We Only Talk Feminist Here. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40078-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40078-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40077-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40078-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics