Advertisement

Direct Anastomosis: Cephalic Vein Hemodialysis Access

  • Rachel Heneghan
  • Niten SinghEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The radiocephalic and brachiocephalic autogenous access approaches are first-line options for dialysis access and listed as “preferred” access by the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) most recent 2006 guidelines. Both have superior long-term patency to prosthetic grafts in meta-analyses. This chapter focuses on direct anastomosis cephalic vein hemodialysis access, techniques, patency, and outcomes.

Keywords

Cimino fistula Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula 

References

  1. 1.
    NKF KDOQI Guidelines 2006 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www2.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guideline_upHD_PD_VA/va_ref.htm#ref23.
  2. 2.
    Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appell K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med. 1966;275(20):1089–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Konner K. History of vascular access for haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:2629–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolowczyk L, Williams AJ, Donovan KL, Gibbons CP. The snuffbox arteriovenous fistula for vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg [Internet]. 2000 Jan [cited 2015 May 6];19(1):70–6. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588499909693.
  5. 5.
    Twine CP, Haidermota M, Woolgar JD, Gibbons CP, Davies CG. A scoring system (DISTAL) for predicting failure of snuffbox arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg [Internet]. 2012 Jul [cited 2015 May 13];44(1):88–91. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588412001839.
  6. 6.
    Robbin ML, Chamberlain NE, Lockhart ME, Gallichio MH, Young CJ, Deierhoi MH, et al. Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula maturity : US evaluation. Radiology [Internet]. Radiolo Soc North Am. 2002 Oct 1 [cited 2015 May 6];225(6):59–64. Available from: http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/citedby/10.1148/radiol.2251011367.
  7. 7.
    Sparks SR, VanderLinden JL, Gnanadev DA, Smith JW, Bunt TJ. Superior patency of perforating antecubital vein arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. Ann Vasc Surg [Internet]. 1997 Mar [cited 2015 May 6];11(2):165–7. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509606615720.
  8. 8.
    Singh N, Starnes BW, Andersen C. Successful Angioaccess. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87(5):1213–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark TWI, Hirsch DA, Jindal KJ, Veugelers PJ, LeBlanc J. Outcome and prognostic factors of restenosis after percutaneous treatment of native hemodialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13(1):51–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maeda K, Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Murata K. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for Brescia-Cimino hemodialysis fistula dysfunction: technical success rate, patency rate and factors that influence the results. Eur J Radiol [Internet]. 2005 Jun [cited 2015 May 11];54(3):426–30. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X04002670.
  11. 11.
    Heye S, Maleux G, Vaninbroukx J, Claes K, Kuypers D, Oyen R. Factors influencing technical success and outcome of percutaneous balloon angioplasty in de novo native hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Radiol [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2015 May 11];81(9):2298–303. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X11006863.
  12. 12.
    Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, et al. EBPG on vascular access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22 Suppl 2:88–117.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feezor RJ, Huber TS. Chapter 249. Autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access. In: Fischer JE, Jones DB, Pomposelli FB, Upchurch Jr. GR, Klimberg VS, Schwaitzberg SD, et al., editors. Fischer’s mastery of surgery [Internet]. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012 [cited 2015 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.surgicalcore.org/chapter/183797.
  14. 14.
    Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, et al. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis [Internet]. 2014 Mar [cited 2015 May 4];63(3):464–78. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638613012183.
  15. 15.
    Voormolen EHJ, Jahrome AK, Bartels LW, Moll FL, Mali WP, Blankestijn PJ. Nonmaturation of arm arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis access: A systematic review of risk factors and results of early treatment. J Vasc Surg [Internet]. 2009 May [cited 2015 May 12];49(5):1325–36. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521408019939.
  16. 16.
    Huber TS, Carter JW, Carter RL, Seeger JM. Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg [Internet]. 2003 Nov [cited 2015 May 12];38(5):1005–11. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521403004269.
  17. 17.
    Murad MH, Elamin MB, Sidawy AN, Malaga G, Rizvi AZ, Flynn DN, et al. Autogenous versus prosthetic vascular access for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg [Internet]. 2008 Nov [cited 2015 May 12];48(5 Suppl):34S–47S. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521408013955.
  18. 18.
    Smith GE, Gohil R, Chetter IC. Factors affecting the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2015 May 12];55(3):849–55. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074152141101857X.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Washington, Harborview Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Vascular Surgery, Professor of SurgeryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations