Skip to main content

Retail Brand Extension: The Moderating Role of Product Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing

Abstract

The paper examines consumers’ perceptions of grocery retail brand extension to a non-traditional offer, namely petrol stations. Retail brand extension literature is limited, particularly as regards new products and services domains in which grocery retailers are increasingly directly operating through their brands. Additionally, the role of product knowledge as a moderator of the attitude-purchase intention relationship requires further insights. To these aims, we propose a model in which product knowledge (PK) is tested as a moderator of the relationship between attitude towards the extension (ATEX) and intention to buy the extended product (INTB). At the same time, we tested the role of ATEX as mediator of the impact of a series of antecedents—conceptual fit (FIT), national brand preference (NBP), risk (R) and resources and competences (R&C). A survey on a sample of grocery retail customers was performed administering a structured questionnaire. Then, data were processed applying Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The conceptual model achieves good predictive validity and all the proposed hypotheses are supported. Some preliminary theoretical and managerial implications are derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, N., & Colgate, M. (2005). Customers’ responses to retail brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3), 393–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., & Sinha, I. (2000). Consumer-level factors moderating the success of private label brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., Ratchford, B. T., & Haines, G. H., Jr. (1994). Subjective product knowledge as a moderator of the relationship between attitudes and purchase intentions for a durable product. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buil, I., de Chernatony, L., & Hem, L. E. (2009). Brand extension strategies: Perceived fit, brand type, and culture influences. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12), 1300–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S. (2000). The strategic role of retail brands in British grocery retailing. European Journal of marketing, 34(8), 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wulf, K., Odekerken‐Schröder, G., Goedertier, F., & Van Ossel, G. (2005). Consumer perceptions of store brands versus national brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(4), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Vecchio, D. (2001). Consumer perceptions of private label quality: The role of product category characteristics and consumer use of heuristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(5), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., Jain, A. K., & Richardson, P. (1995). Correlates of store brand proneness: Some empirical observations. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(4), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, A., & Merrilees, B. (2013). Retail brand extensions: Unpacking the link between brand extension attitude and change in parent brand equity. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. S., & Chen, S. (2009). Consumer-factors moderating private label brand success: Further empirical results. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(11), 896–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Mieres, C., Martín, M. D. A., & Gutiérrez, T. J. A. (2006). Antecedents of the difference in perceived risk between store brands and national brands. European Journal of Marketing, 40(1/2), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grønhaug, K., Hem, L., & Lines, R. (2002). Exploring the impact of product category risk and consumer knowledge in brand extensions. The Journal of Brand Management, 9(6), 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hem, L. E., Iversen, N. M., & Olsen, L. E. (2014). Category characteristics’ effects on brand extension attitudes: A research note. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1589–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforet, S. (2008). Retail brand extension—Perceived fit, risks and trust. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fritz, M. S., Williams, J., & Lockwood, C. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, E., Belli, A., & Marchi, G. (2015). The role of customer loyalty as a brand extension purchase predictor. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25(2), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyvis, T., & Janiszewski, C. (2004). When are broader brands stronger brands? An accessibility perspective on the success of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V., & Chaudhury, A. (2014). Predicting retail brand extension strategy success: A consumer based model. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2010). What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishnan, A. V., & Weitz, B. A. (1991). Role of product knowledge in evaluation of brand extension. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 407–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product-level similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, P. S., Jain, A. K., & Dick, A. (1996). Household store brand proneness: A framework. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B., & van Trijp, H. (1991). The use of lisrel in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Martinelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martinelli, E., De Canio, F., Marchi, G. (2016). Retail Brand Extension: The Moderating Role of Product Knowledge. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Gijsbrecht, E. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39946-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics