Advertisement

Modeling and Simulation of Sectarian Tensions in Split Communities

  • Christopher ThronEmail author
  • Rachel McCoy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9708)

Abstract

We present a simple agent-based model for the evolution of between-group attitudes (measured on a linear scale) in a community that is divided between two distinct social groups (which may be distinguished by religion, ethnicity, etc.). We derive approximate analytical equations to predict the change in mean attitudes over time given certain assumptions. The model predicts that social pressures cause each group to tend towards extremes of hostility or acceptance towards the other group. Under some conditions, groups can have stable extremist and moderate factions, but very small changes in system parameters can upset the stability. Interpersonal cohesion (the degree to which individuals influence each other’s opinions) plays a significant role in controlling within-group polarization. We show that strategies to improve intergroup relations that target subsets of each group are much less effective when cohesion is low.

Keywords

Sectarian Tension Affinity Hostility Conflict Reconciliation Opinion dynamics Agent-based model Mathematical model 

References

  1. 1.
    Thron, C., McCoy, R.: Affinity and Hostility in Divided Communities: A Mathematical Model (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2687353
  2. 2.
    Dixon, J.: What causes civil wars? Integrating quantitative research findings. Int. Stud. Rev. 11(4), 707–735 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epstein, J.M.: Modeling civil violence: an agent-based computational approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(suppl. 3), 7243–7250 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo, L., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K.: An evolutionary game-theoretic model for ethno-religious conflicts between two groups. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 17(4), 379–401 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey. Int. J. Mod. Phy. C 18(12), 1819–1838 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Selliaas, A.: Can sport start reconciliation between peoples and states in conflict? Play the Game Conference, Reykjavik (2007). (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6cqn7foAI)
  7. 7.
    Thron, C.: Affinity/Hostility in Divided Communities, Version 1. CoMSES Computational Model Library (2015). https://www.openabm.org/model/4780/version/1
  8. 8.
    Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science and MathematicsTexas A&M University-Central TexasKilleenUSA

Personalised recommendations