Abstract
There is no consensus among scholars using and defining knowledge types and their interaction. Theoretical distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge has emerged. The tacit knowledge is positioned in contrast with the explicit knowledge as a result of this dichotomy. However, there are indications that every knowledge has both tacit and explicit elements that cannot exist one without the other—they are complementary and create synergy for the knowledge management. The aim of this paper is to explore relevance of knowledge distinction between the tacit and explicit knowledge for technology transfer purposes. Brief review of literature, draft discussion, and one-on-one interviews were performed in order to find the answer to the research question: Does distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge have place in the exploring of knowledge for technology transfer purposes? Content analysis was performed to process qualitative data that were collected through interviews. The research results show that the distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge is not suitable for technology transfer purposes. Knowledge consists of both tacit and explicit components. There is also an explanation for many contradictions in knowledge management studies exploring knowledge explicitness in this paper. The paper provides a better understanding of the issues related to tacit versus explicit knowledge dichotomy within technology transfer. There are theoretical implications as well as recommendations for future research in this study.
…we can know more than we can tell
Polanyi (1966, p. 4)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, T. J., & O’Shea, R. P. (2014). Introduction. In T. J. Allen & R. P. O’Shea (Eds.), Building technology transfer within research universities: An entrepreneurial approach (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Association of University Technology Managers, (n.d.). Bayh-Dole Act. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://www.autm.net/Bayh_Dole_Act1.htm
BusinessDictionary, (n.d.). Tacit knowledge. WebFinance, Inc. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/tacit-knowledge.html
Chobya, L. A. K., Eck, R. W., & Wyant, W. D. (1999). Teamwork and technology transfer in low-volume road safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1652(1), 59–67. Retrieved April 6, 2015, from http://apps.webofknowledge.com.resursi.rtu.lv/full_record.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=12&SID=W2EOtmT2IJztz4Ykj3t&page=1&doc=1
Dasgupta, P., & Taneja, N. (2011). Low carbon growth: An Indian perspective on sustainability and technology transfer. Problems of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 65–74.
Davies, M. (2001). Knowledge (explicit and implicit): Philosophical aspects. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 8126–8132). Oxford: ElsevierScience Ltd.
Dictionary.com Unabridged, (n.d.). Tacit. Random House, Inc. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tacit
European Commission. (2010a). Communication from the Commission. Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF
European Commission. (2010b). Project Europe 2030. Challenges and opportunities. A report to the European Council by the Reflection Group on the Future of the EU 2030. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from www.consilium.europa.eu/en/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=1081
Frechtling, J., Mark, M. M., Rog, D. J., Thomas, V., Frierson, H., Hood, S., Hughes, G., & Johnson, E. (2010). The 2010 User-friendly handbook for project evaluation. National Science Foundation. Retrieved April 1, 2015, from https://www.westat.com/sites/westat.com/files/2010UFHB.pdf
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1992). The marketing and R & D interface (Working Paper). Cambridge: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Grotz, R., & Braun, B. (1993). Networks, milieux and individual firm strategies: Empirical evidence of an innovative SME environment. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 75(3), 149–162.
Hedesstrom, T., & Whitley, E. A. (2000). What is meant by tacit knowledge? Towards a better understanding of the shape of actions. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems, Trends in Information and Communication Systems for the 21st Century, ECIS 2000. Vienna, Austria, July 3–5, 2000
Hossain, M. (2012). Balancing between inward and outward technology transfer in open innovation paradigm (Working Paper). Espoo: Aalto University—School of Science. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170967
Ichikawa, J. J., & Steup, M. (2014). The analysis of knowledge. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/knowledge-analysis
Jennex, M. (2008). Introductory chapter: Contemporary research in knowledge management. In M. Jennex (Ed.), Knowledge management: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. xxxviii–xxxix). New York: Hershey.
Kneller, R. (2001). Technology transfer: A review for biomedical researchers. Clinical Cancer Research, 7(4), 761–774.
Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Persaud, A. (1999). Building technological capability through importing technology: The case of Indonesian manufacturing industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(1), 81–96.
Li, M., & Gao, F. (2003). Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: A critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 6–14.
Meyer, B., & Sugiyama, K. (2006). The concept of knowledge in KM: A dimensional model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 17–35.
Mom, T. J. M., Oshri, I., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). The skills base of technology transfer professionals. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(9), 871–891.
Morrissey, M. T., & Almonacid, S. (2005). Rethinking technology transfer. Journal of Food Engineering, 67(1–2), 135–145.
Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Online Etymology Dictionary, (n.d.). Tacit. Douglas Harper, Historian. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tacit
Phillips, R. (2002). Technology business incubators: How effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.
Puusa, A., & Eerikainen, M. (2010). Is tacit knowledge really tacit? Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 307–318. Retrieved April 1, 2015, from http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=280
Ray, T. (2009). Rethinking Polanyi’s concept of tacit knowledge: From personal knowing to imagined institutions. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 47(1), 75–92.
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253–261.
Salin, J. G. (2010). Problems and solutions in wood drying modelling: History and future. Wood Material Science and Engineering, 5(2), 123–134.
Sazali, A. W., & Raduan, C. R. (2011). The handbook of inter firm technology transfer: An integrated knowledge-based view and organizational learning perspective. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Sazali, A. W., Raduan, C. R., & Suzana, I. W. O. (2012). Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: A literature analysis. International Business Research, 5(1), 61–71.
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2012). Product design and development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
University of California Museum of Paleontology. (2015). Misconceptions about science. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://undsci.berkeley.edu/teaching/misconceptions.php
Virtanen, I. (2009). How tacit is tacit knowledge? Proceedings of the ER 2009 PhD Colloquium. Retrieved April 1, 2015, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-597/paper-3-1.pdf
Virtanen, I. (2010). Epistemological problems concerning explication of tacit knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11(4). Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://www.tlainc.com/articl246.htm
Zhenhua, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge/knowing and the problem of articulation. Tradition & Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 30(2), 11–23.
Acknowledgment
This work has been supported by the European Social Fund within the project “Support for the implementation of doctoral studies at Riga Technical University.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dubickis, M., Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2017). Tacit vs Explicit Knowledge Dichotomy: State-of-the-Art Review for Technology Transfer Purposes. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Financial Environment and Business Development. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39918-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39919-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)