Volunteering in Armenia: Leaving the Soviet Legacy Behind?

  • Yevgenya Jenny Paturyan
  • Valentina Gevorgyan
Part of the Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies book series (NCSS)


Based on some of the results of a 2-year study of Armenian civil society, this chapter explores patterns and realities of volunteering in Armenia, focusing on generational change and on motivations to volunteer. We argue that young people are not more likely to volunteer, thus refuting the ‘active post-communist generation’ assumption. Using both quantitative and qualitative data we demonstrate that volunteering is motivated mostly by career-related considerations, closely followed by altruistic motives. There is a notable difference between perceptions of NGO leaders and volunteers: the former emphasize career-related motivators, whereas the latter state that altruism is as important for them as career in their explanations of why they volunteer.


Volunteering Soviet legacy Youth South Caucasus Motivations to volunteer 


  1. Aslanyan, S., Adibekian, A., Ajabyan, N., & Coe, B. A. (2007). Civil society in Armenia: From a theoretical framework to reality. Yerevan, Armenia: Center for the Development of Civil Society, CIVICUS World Alliance for Citizen Participation. Retrieved from
  2. Brudney, J. L., & Nezhina, T. G. (2005). What is old is new again: Achieving effectiveness with volunteer programs in Kazakhstan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16(3), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawson, J. I. (1995). Anti-nuclear activism in the USSR and its successor states: A surrogate for nationalism? Environmental Politics, 4(3), 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hakobyan, L., & Tadevosyan, M. (2010a). Culture of volunteerism in Armenia. Case study (Case Study). Yerevan, Armenia: Counterpart International. Retrieved from
  6. Hakobyan, L., & Tadevosyan, M. (2010b). Impact of Environmental Organizations on Policy Change in Armenia (Case Study). Yerevan, Armenia: Counterpart International. Retrieved from
  7. Hakobyan, L., Tadevosyan, M., Sardar, A., & Stepanyan, A. (2010). Armenian civil society: From transition to consolidation (Analytical country report). Yerevan, Armenia: Counterpart International. Retrieved from
  8. Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Inglehart, R. (2003). Modernization and Volunteering. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 55–70). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishkanian, A., Gyulkhandanyan, E., Manusyan, S., & Manusyan, A. (2013). Civil society, development and environmental activism in Armenia. The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Retrieved from
  12. Juknevičius, S., & Savicka, A. (2003). From restitution to innovation: Volunteering in postcommunist countries. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 127–142). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ochoa, E. L. (2012). Strengthening civil society and its interaction with state institutions (Policy paper). Yerevan: European Union Advisory Group to the Republic of Armenia. Retrieved from
  14. Paturyan, Y., & Gevorgyan, V. (2014). Armenian civil society after twenty years of transition: Still post-communist? Yerevan, Armenia: Turpanjian Center for Policy Analysis. Retrieved from
  15. Policy Forum Armenia. (2013). Corruption in Armenia. Retrieved from
  16. Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2003). Global civil society: An overview. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
  17. Sargsyan, L. (2012). Key motivational drivers for volunteering. Yerevan, Armenia: American University of Armenia.Google Scholar
  18. Stefes, C. H. (2006). Understanding post-Soviet transitions: Corruption, collusion and clientelism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. The World Bank. (2014). The World Bank. Retrieved from
  20. Transparency International. (2013). Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from
  21. Transparency International. (2014). Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved December 6, 2014, from
  22. Van Der Heijden, H.-A. (1999). Environmental movements, ecological modernisation and political opportunity structures. Environmental Politics, 8(1), 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Voicu, M., & Voicu, B. (2003). Volunteering in Romania: A rara avis. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 143–159). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiepking, P., & Einolf, C. J. (2012). Gender differences in charitable giving in Europe. Presented at the ARNOVA conference.Google Scholar
  25. Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2003). Generations and organizational change. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering (pp. 161–178). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Turpanjian Center for Policy AnalysisAmerican University of ArmeniaYerevanArmenia

Personalised recommendations