Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring and Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation in Coastal Zones: Overview of the Indicators in Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience and Hazards

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

Recently, the number of public policies initiated within the framework of CCA has increased in several western countries. On the other hand, the evaluation and measurement of CCA progress remain embryonic and inadequately charted by indicators quantifying the changes and impacts attributable to these policies that engender new stakes and concepts that are difficult to measure and do not always produce a consensus.

Our paper presents the results of a scoping review examining the extent, scope and nature of the literature dealing with CCA indicators and metrics. Using scoping-review protocol, bibliographic databases were examined (for the years 2005–2015), using key words, in both English and French, dealing with the measurement of progress in public CCA efforts in coastal areas. In all, 165 documents were selected and analyzed and more than 200 indicators were looked at.

Our analyses point out that the conceptual framework for CCA remains fragmented given the different scientific approaches and disciplines. The lack of consensus about CCA and about the indicators designed to assess CCA initiatives is a major limitation in coastal zone management. One way is to harmonize the practices for analyzing human and environmental systems respectively, both in the fields of the social and the natural sciences. In terms of governance, network management appears to be the most effective method in the context of social and environmental change. In terms of indicators, the WorldRiskIndex provides a useful estimate of the vulnerability of countries with respect to the effects of climate change in a context of rapid urbanization. In a regional context or a smaller geographical area, GIS stands out for being able to incorporate a lot of data, and to ensure their continuous update. Moreover, the ICZM is an effective approach at the national level that nevertheless takes into account the regional differences in coastal zones. The studies included in this analysis also demonstrate that the process of adopting CCA measures must be transparent and participatory since they aim for both short-term and long-term objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acosta L, Klein RJ, Reidsma P, Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MD, Leemans R, Schröter D (2013) A spatially explicit scenario-driven model of adaptive capacity to global change in Europe. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1211–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S et al (2008) Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst 6(7):12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosello F, De Cian E (2014) Climate change, sea level rise, and coastal disasters. A review of modeling practices. Energy Econ 46:593–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M, Putten I, Sheaves M (2015) The pace and progress of adaptation: marine climate change preparedness in Australia’s coastal communities. Mar Policy 53:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner J, Jiménez JA, Sardá R (2008) Environmental indicators GIS of the Catalan Coast. J Coast Conserv 11(4):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre Climate Change Res Work Pap 38:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N, Anderson S, Ayers J et al (2011) Tracking adaptation and measuring development. IIED, London/Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I (1992) Adapt and thrive. Canadian Climate Centre, Downsview, ON, unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Pile J (2014) The adaptation-resistance spectrum: a classification of contemporary adaptation approaches to climate-related coastal change. Ocean Coast Manag 94:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis K, Drey N, Gould D (2009) What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud 46(10):1386–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, van Buuren A, Graveland J, Tassone VC (2009) Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Change 95(1–2):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunford R, Harrison PA, Jäger J, Rounsevell MDA, Tinch R (2015) Exploring climate change vulnerability across sectors and scenarios using indicators of impacts and coping capacity. Clim Change 128(3–4):339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis J, Biesbroek R (2013) Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1476–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finland. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MMM) (2005) Finland’s national strategy for climate change adaptation. MMM, Helsinki, p 281

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel-Reed J, Brooks N (2008) Proposed framework for monitoring adaptation to climate change adaptation. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanak E, Moreno G (2012) California coastal management with a changing climate. Clim Change 111:45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey N, Woodroffe CD (2008) Australian approaches to coastal vulnerability assessment. Sustain Sci 3:67–87, Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedger MM, Mitchell T, Leavy J, Greeley M, Downie A (2008) Desk review: Evaluation of adaptation to climate change from a development perspective. Institute of Development Studies, Lisa Horrocks, AEA Group, Brighton, p 60, August

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett T, Fletcher S (2010) The emergence of service-based integrated coastal management in the UK. Area 42:313–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Glob Environ Chang 21(1):198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J, Klein R (2009) Integrating knowledge to assess coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise: the development of the DIVA tool. Glob Environ Chang 19:384–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J, Nicholls RJ, Vafeidis AT, Tol RS, Avagianou T (2010) Assessing risk of and adaptation to sea-level rise in the European Union: an application of DIVA. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 15(7):703–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann ME et al (2011) Classifying knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability in Europe for informing adaptation research and decision-making: a conceptual meta-analysis. Glob Environ Chang 21(3):1106–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014a) Coastal systems and low-lying areas [en ligne], ch. 5. p 32. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap5_FGDall.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015

  • IPCC (2014b) Glossary, rapport final, [online]. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Glossary_FGD.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2015

  • Jørgensen M (2006) Evaluating cross-sector partnerships. Working paper presented at the conference public–private partnerships in the post WSSD context, Copenhagen Business School, 14 August

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettle NP, Dow K (2014) Cross-level differences and similarities in coastal climate change adaptation planning. Environ Sci Pol 44:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux C et al (2013) Natural resource manager perceptions of agency performance on climate change. J Environ Manage 114:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmen DS, Warren FJ, Lacroix J, Bush E (eds) (2008) From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007. Government of Canada, Ottawa, ON, p 448

    Google Scholar 

  • Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan A (2009) Proposition d’une trame de recherche pour appréhender la capacité d’adaptation au changement climatique. VertigO, la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 9:3

    Google Scholar 

  • McClatchey J, Devoy R, Woolf D, Bremner B, James N (2014) Climate change and adaptation in the coastal areas of Europe’s Northern Periphery Region. Ocean Coast Manag 94:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH, Brenkert AL, Malone EL (2001) Vulnerability to climate change: a quantitative approach. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL-SA-33642). Prepared for the US Department of Energy, pp 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan M et al (2013) Planification nationale de l’adaptation: L’expérience des pays de l’OCDE. Éditions OCDE. doi:10.1787/5k483jp21xg0-fr

  • Nicholls RJ, Hoozemans FM, Marchand M (1999) Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: regional and global analyses. Glob Environ Chang 9:S69–S87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V et al (2008) Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment: scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci 3(1):89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) Adaptation to climate change: key terms. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) Glossaire des principaux termes relatifs à l’évaluation et la gestion axée sur les résultats [online]. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/2754804.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2015

  • OECD (2014) L’eau et l’adaptation au changement climatique : Des politiques pour naviguer en eaux inconnues. Études de l’OCDE sur l’eau. Éditions OCDE. doi:10.1787/9789264200647-fr

  • Ostrom E (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):550–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt AG, Schröter D, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Klein RJ (2009) Vulnerability research and assessment to support adaptation and mitigation: common themes from the diversity of approaches. In: Assessing vulnerability to global environmental change: making research useful for adaptation decision making and policy. pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson R, Tilley N (2004) Realist evaluation. Sage, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston B, Westaway M, Yuen EJ (2011) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 16(4):407–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romieu E, Welle T, Schneiderbauer S et al (2010) Vulnerability assessment within climate change and natural hazard contexts: revealing gaps and synergies through coastal applications. Sustain Sci 5(2):159–170, Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja HE (2011) A framework for monitoring and evaluating adaptation to climate change. Community of Practice, Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC, p 78

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB (1996) Development of adaptation measures for water resources. Int J Water Resour Dev 12(2):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stakhiv E (1993) Evaluation of IPCC adaptation strategies. Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir, VA, draft report

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Z, Lindell MK, Prater C et al (2011) Examining local coastal zone management capacity in U.S. Pacific Coastal counties. Coast Manag 39(2):105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thywissen K (2006) Components of risk: a comparative glossary. UNU-EHS, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts J, van Proosdij D (2013) Development of a relative coastal vulnerability index in a macro-tidal environment for climate change adaptation. J Coast Conserv 17(4):775–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torresan S, Critto A, Dalla Valle M (2008) Assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change: comparing segmentation at global and regional scales. Sustain Sci 3(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2005) Adaptation policy framework for climate change: developing policies strategies and measures. In: Lim B, Spanger-Siegfred E (eds). Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland RH, Hutton MS (2012) Evaluating organizational collaborations: suggested entry points and strategies. Am J Eval 33(3):366–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de recherche et d’expertise en évaluation (CREXE), University of Québec, École nationale d’administration publique, Québec, QC, Canada

    Moktar Lamari, Jessica Bouchard, Johann Jacob & Line Poulin-Larivière

Authors
  1. Moktar Lamari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Bouchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johann Jacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Line Poulin-Larivière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moktar Lamari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Science, Research and Transfer Center, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. Food and Tourism Management, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Haruna Musa

  3. Manchester, United Kingdom

    Gina Cavan

  4. Geography & Environmental Management, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Paul O'Hare

  5. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal

    Julia Seixas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lamari, M., Bouchard, J., Jacob, J., Poulin-Larivière, L. (2016). Monitoring and Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation in Coastal Zones: Overview of the Indicators in Use. In: Leal Filho, W., Musa, H., Cavan, G., O'Hare, P., Seixas, J. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience and Hazards. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39880-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation