Skip to main content

Introduction: Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood. Contesting New Modes of Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood

Part of the book series: Governance and Limited Statehood ((GLS))

  • 573 Accesses

Abstract

The Paris Agreement for Climate Change or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) rely on new modes of governance for implementation. Indeed, new modes of governance such as market-based instruments, public-private partnerships or multi-stakeholder initiatives have been praised for playing a pivotal role in effective and legitimate sustainability governance. Yet, do they also deliver in areas of limited statehood? States such as Malaysia or the Dominican Republic partly lack the ability to implement and enforce rules; their statehood is limited. This introduction provides the analytical framework of this volume and critically examines the performance of new modes of governance in areas of limited statehood, drawing on the book’s in-depth case studies on issues of climate change, biodiversity, and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andonova, L. B. (2014). Boomerangs to partnerships? Explaining state participation in transnational partnerships for sustainability. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 481–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (2010a). The promise of new modes of environmental governance. In K. Bäckstrand, J. Khan, A. Kronsell, & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance (pp. 3–27). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (2010b). Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (2010c). Environmental politics after the deliberative turn. In K. Bäckstrand, J. Khan, A. Kronsell, E. K. B. Lövbrand, et al. (Eds.), Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance (pp. 217–234). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (Eds.). (2015). Rethinking the green state: Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J., & Eckersley, R. (2005). The state and the global ecological crisis. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisheim, M., & Liese, A. (Eds.). (2014). Transnational partnerships: Effectively providing for sustainable development? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, B., & Klintman, M. (2010). Stakeholder participation in the EU governance of GMO in the food chain. In K. Bäckstrand, J. Khan, A. Kronsell, & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance (pp. 105–122). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., et al. (2007). Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und Empirische Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., et al. (2012). Navigating the anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance. World politics in the anthropocene. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2008). Der „Schatten der Hierarchie“ — Ein Governance-Paradox? In F. Schuppert & M. Zürn (Eds.), Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. PVS –Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 41 (pp. 118–131). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Botzem, S., et al. (2009). Governance als Prozess. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M. J., Newell, P., Paterson, M., Roger, C., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S., & Stange, M. (2011). Governance and colonial rule. In T. Risse (Ed.), Governance without a state?: Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood (pp. 39–64). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (1999). Private authority and international affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff, N. (2009). The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization, 63(1), 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A.,&Lewis, B. (2015).With landmark climate accord, world marks turn from fossil fuels. http://in.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-summit-idINKBN0TV04L20151213.Accessed 29 Feb 2016.

  • Fischer, F. (2012). Participatory governance: From theory to practice. In D. Levy-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T. J., Ward, H., & Howard, B. (2002). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2004). State building: Governance and world order in the twenty-first century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E., & Pauly, L. W. (2005). Complex sovereignty. Reconstituting political authority in the twenty-first century. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Pistorius, T., & Vijge, M. J. (2015). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: The REDD+ Partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, DOI: 10.1007/s10784-015-9274-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (2004). Addressing the global governance deficit. Global Environmental Politics, 4(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2002). On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. R., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrelmann, A., Leibfried, S., Martens, K., & Mayer, P. (Eds.). (2007). Transforming the golden-age nation state, Transformations of the state series. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., & Martello, M. (Eds.). (2004). Earthly politics. Local and global in environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanie, N., Haas, P. M., & Andresen, S. (2013). Improving global environmental governance. Best practices for architecture and agency, Routledge research in global environmental governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, R. (1998). Einleitung. Effizienz und Demokratie. Probleme des Regierens in entgrenzten Räumen. In R. Kohler-Koch (Ed.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen. PVS-Sonderheft 29 (pp. 11–25). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance. New government-society interactions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty. Organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D., & Risse, T. (2014). External actors, state-building, and service provision in areas of limited statehood. Governance: Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Walter-Drop, G., & Wiesel, J. (2014). Taking the state (back) out? A macro-quantitative analysis of statehood and the delivery of collective goods and services. In S. D. Krasner, & T. Risse (eds.), External actors, state-building, and service provision in areas of limited statehood. Special issue ofgovernance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, S., & Zürn, M. (2005). Transformations of the state? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, S., Huber, E., Lange, M., Levy, J. D., & Nullmeier, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Faur, D. (2012). The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basics of politics. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2004). Governance im modernen Staat. In A. Benz (Ed.), Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen (pp. 65–76). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2008).Von der Steuerungstheorie zu Global Governance [online text], Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2004). Arguing, bargaining and all that: Communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10(3), 395–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obergassel, W. et al (2016). Phoenix from the Ashes-An Analysis of the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Wuppertal Institute. http://wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wupperinst/Paris_Results.pdf.

  • Pattberg, P., Biermann F., Chan S. & Mert A. (Eds.). (2012). Public private partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence, and legitimacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2000). Let’s argue! Communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2011a). Governance in areas of limited statehood: Introduction and overview. In T. Risse (Ed.), Governance without a state? Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood (pp. 1–35). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2011b). Governance without a state? Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2013). Arguing about arguing: A comment. Critical Policy Studies, 7(3), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., & Kleine, M. (2010). Deliberation in negotiations. European Journal of International Relations, 17(5), 708–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. O. (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. (2003). State failure and state weakness in a time of terror. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. (2004). When states fail. Causes and consequences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuppert, G. F. (2005). Governance-Forschung. Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuppert, G. F., & Zürn, M. (2008). Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siebenhüner, B. (2004). Social learning and sustainability science: Which role can stakeholder participation play? International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(2), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Asselt, H. (2016). The Role of Non-State Actors in Reviewing Ambition, Implementation, and Compliance Under the Paris Agreement. Climate Law 6(1): 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1921). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. Analysis and anti-trust. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2013). Introduction: The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. (1998). Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alejandro Esguerra , Nicole Helmerich or Thomas Risse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esguerra, A., Helmerich, N., Risse, T. (2017). Introduction: Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood. Contesting New Modes of Governance. In: Esguerra, A., Helmerich, N., Risse, T. (eds) Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood. Governance and Limited Statehood. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39871-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics