Abstract
This chapter considers how the metaphor of research as a maze can be used to extend understandings of the character and significance of contemporary research and the work and identities of contemporary researchers. The authors discuss the implications of the increasing influence of the Western academic system across the globe and argue that the resultant outputs serve the objectives of governments’ and institutions’ internationalisation agendas but may come at a cost, the loss of local and global linguistic and cultural diversity. In concluding the authors offer opportunities for ways in which Western researchers might operate within the knowledge economy with increased integrity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. (2013). Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: The role of research universities in developing countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 316–330. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.773222.
Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 85–96. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.740678.
Bansel, P., Davies, B., Gannon, S., & Linnell, S. (2008). Technologies of audit at work on the writing subject: A discursive analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 673–683. doi:10.1080/03075070802457017.
Basken, P., & Voosen, P. (2014, February 24). Strapped scientists abandon research and students, Online newspaper. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Strapped-Scientists-Abandon/144921/
Bastalich, W. (2010). Knowledge economy and research innovation. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 845–857. doi:10.1080/03075070903406533.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001.
Billig, M. (2012). Academic words and academic capitalism. Athenea Digital (Revista de Pensamiento e Investigacion Social), 13, 7–12 Retrieved from http://psicologiasocial.uab.es/athenea/index.php/atheneaDigital/article/view/1108
Bonefeld, W. (2013). Adam Smith and ordoliberalism: On the political form of market liberty. Review of International Studies, 39, 233–250. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000198.
Brutt-Griffler, J., & Samimy, K. K. (1999). Revisiting the colonial in the postcolonial: Critical praxis for nonnative-English-speaking teachers in a TESOL program. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 413–431.
Chevan, J., M’kumbuzi, V. R. P., & Biraguma, J. (2012). Culture, language, and resources: Overcoming barriers to research collaboration with physical therapist education program faculty in a developing country. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 26, 50–54.
Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 29, 99–112. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.776990.
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 185–209. doi:10.2307/3587717.
Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26, 1–14. doi:10.1080/01596300500039310.
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2005). The time of their lives? Academic workers in neoliberal time(s). Health Sociology Review, 14, 47–58. doi:10.5172/hesr.14.1.47.
Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., & Somerville, M. (2005). Embodied women at work in neoliberal times and places. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 344–362. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00277.x.
Deblonde, M. (2015). Responsible research and innovation: Building knowledge arenas for glocal sustainability research. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2, 20–38. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.1001235.
Ellis, E., Gogolin, I., & Clyne, M. (2010). The Janus face of monolingualism: A comparison of German and Australian language education policies. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11, 439–460. doi:10.1080/14664208.2010.550544.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness, 8, 71–83. doi:10.1080/09658419908667119.
Fairclough, N. (2002). Language in new capitalism. Discourse and Society, 13, 163–166. doi:10.1177/0957926502013002404.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 76–94.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. New York: Routledge.
Flew, T. (2014). Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven, 122, 49–71. doi:10.1177/0725513614535965.
Flores, N. (2013). The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 500–520. doi:10.1002/tesq.114.
Gao, S., & Park, J. S.-Y. (2015). Space and language learning under the neoliberal economy. L2 Journal, 7, 78–96 Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3mb2f08z
Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal agency. Current Anthropology, 52, 537–555. doi:10.1086/660866.
Gray, J. (2010). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hackett, E. J. (2014). Academic capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39, 635–638. doi:10.1177/0162243914540219.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hénard, F., Diamond, L., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Approaches to internationalisation and their Implications for strategic management and institutional practice: A guide for higher education institutions. Retrieved from http://search.oecd.org/edu/imhe/Approaches%20to%20internationalisation%20-%20final%20-%20web.pdf
Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2011). The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics, 89, 967–983. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0474-y.
Kachru, B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kachru, B. (1992). Models for non-native Englishes. In B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Kauppinen, I. (2012). Towards transnational academic capitalism. Higher Education, 64, 543–556. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9511-x.
Knight, J. (2013). The changing landscape of higher education internationalisation – For better or worse? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17, 84–90. doi:10.1080/13603108.2012.753957.
Koyalan, A., & Mumford, S. (2011). Changes to English as an additional language writers’ research articles: From spoken to written register. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 113–123. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2010.10.001.
Kravchenko, A. V. (2010). Native speakers, mother tongues and other objects of wonder. Language Sciences, 32, 677–685. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2010.07.008.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Dangerous liason: Globalization, empire and TESOL. In J. Edge (Ed.), (Re)-locating TESOL in an age of empire. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Lin, H.-Y. (2013). Critical perspectives on global English: A study of their implications. Intergrams, 13(2). Retrieved from http://benz.nchu.edu.tw/~intergrams/intergrams/132/132-lhy.pdf
Lin, A., & Luke, A. (2006). Coloniality, postcoloniality, and TESOL...Can a spider weave its way out of the web that it is being woven into just as it weaves? Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3(2/3), 65–73. doi:10.1207/s15427587clis032&3_1.
Lynch, K. (2014). New managerialism: The impact on education. Concept, 5(3), 1–11 Retrieved from http://concept.lib.ed.ac.uk/index.php/Concept/article/view/271
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x.
Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49, 45–59. doi:10.1111/ejed.12061.
Mendoza, P. (2012). The role of context in academic capitalism: The industry-friendly department case. The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 26–48.
Miszczyński, M. (2012). The knowledge economy as utopia. The case of Poland. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai – Studia Europaea, LVII(2), 5–28. Retrieved from http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=26663f23-bb82-43c6-8d9e-3024dca15ec1&articleId=bce9afb3-306c-4e52-949d-5f0b354a2aa8
Muijs, D., & Rumyantseva, N. (2014). Coopetition in education: Collaborating in a competitive environment. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10833-013-9223-8.
Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25, 213–230. doi:10.1080/02601370600697045.
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 313–345. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718.
Pederson, R. (2012). Representation, globalization, and the native speaker: Dialectics of language, ideology, and power. In K. Sung & R. Pederson (Eds.), Critical ELT in Asia. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. New York: Longman.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonization. London: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2006). The myth of English as an international language. In A. P. Sinfree Makoni (Ed.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Pennycook, A. (2007). ELT and colonialism. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, Vol. 15, (pp. 13–24). New York: Springer.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London: Routledge.
Peters, M. A. (2007). Knowledge economy, development and the future of higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R. (2008). The linguistic imperialism of neoliberal empire. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5, 1–43. doi:10.1080/15427580701696886.
Phillipson, R. (2009a). Linguistic imperialism continued. London: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2009b). A review of “(re)locating TESOL in an age of empire”. Language & Education: An International Journal, 23, 191–194. doi:10.1080/09500780802153000.
Phillipson, R. (2013). TESOL expertise in the empire of English. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 5–16.
Piller, I., & Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42, 23–44. doi:10.1017/S0047404512000887.
Prince, S. (1993). The discourse of pictures: Iconicity and film studies. Film Quarterly, 47(1), 16–28. doi:10.2307/1213106.
Rivera, K. (1999). Popular research and social transformation: A community-based approach to critical pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 485–500.
Robertson, S. L. (2014). Untangling theories and hegemonic projects in researching education and the knowledge economy. In A. D. Reid, E. P. Hart, & M. A. Peters (Eds.), A companion to research in education (pp. 267–276). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ruecker, T. (2011). Challenging the native and nonnative English speaker hierarchy in ELT: New directions from race theory. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8, 400–422.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 121–132. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 78–82. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.003.
Schluer, J. (2014). Writing for publication in linguistics: Exploring niches of multilingual publishing among German linguists. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2014.06.001.
Shin, H. (2006). Rethinking TESOL From a SOL’s perspective: Indigenous epistemology and decolonizing praxis in TESOL. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3(2/3), 147–167. doi:10.1207/s15427587clis032&3_5.
Springer, S. (2015). Violent neoliberalism. New York: Palgrave.
Sung, K., & Pederson, R. (2012). Critical ELT practices in Asia. In S. R. Steinberg (Series Ed.), Transgressions: cultural studies and education. Kiwan Sung & R. Pederson (Eds.), Critical ELT practices in Asia. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Trahar, D. (2007). Teaching and learning: The international higher education landscape some theories and working practices. Discussions in Education. Retrieved from www.escalate.ac.uk/3559
Waseem, F., & Asadullah, S. (2013). Linguistic domination and critical language awareness. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 799–820. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jensen-Clayton, C., Murray, A. (2016). Working Beyond the Research Maze. In: Rossi, D., Gacenga, F., Danaher, P. (eds) Navigating the Education Research Maze. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39853-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39853-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39852-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39853-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)