Advertisement

Rhetorical Agency in a Neoliberal Age: Foucault, Power, Agency, and Ethos

  • Robert Danisch
Chapter
  • 506 Downloads
Part of the Rhetoric, Politics and Society book series (RPS)

Abstract

Rhetorical agency generally refers to the ability to speak, to express oneself, or to create rhetoric. This essay begins with a consideration of the classical Aristotelian concept of ethos as a mode of expressing and practicing rhetorical agency. Ethos speaks directly to the power of subjectivity and the potential of rhetorical discourse to produce social and political change. Michel Foucault presents a unique and considerable challenge to both classical and modern conceptions of ethos, and helps explain how and why our neoliberal moment complicates ethos as a function of rhetorical agency. In the end, I consider the Occupy Wall Street movement as a way to enact agency in a neoliberal moment.

Keywords

Hand Gesture Modern Notion Discourse Practice Occupy Wall Street Rhetorical Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1984. The Rhetoric and Poetics of Aristotle, trans. W. R. Roberts. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  2. Bladwin, David. 1989. Paradoxes of Power. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, Kenneth.1969. The Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction, trans. R. Hurley. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1980. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1985. The History of Sexuality Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure, trans. R. Hurley. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1986. The History of Sexuality Volume 3: The Care of the Self, trans. R. Hurley. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1991. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, eds. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1997. Michel Foucault: Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth, ed. P. Rabinow. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  12. Garver, Eugene. 1995. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gill, Christopher. 1996. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grimaldi, William. 1980. Aristotle, Rhetoric I: A Commentary. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McKerrow, Raymie. 1999. Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis. In Contemporary Rhetorical Theory, A Reader, eds. John Louis Lucaites, Celeste Michelle Condit, and Sally Caudill, 441–463. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, Toby. 1993. The Well-Tempered Self: Citizenship, Culture, and the Postmodern Subject. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1990. The Agony of Politics: The Nietzschean Roots of Foucault’s Thought. American Political Science Review 884(3): 907–925.Google Scholar
  18. Vivian, Brad. 2004. Being Made Strange: Rhetoric Beyond Representation. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Danisch
    • 1
  1. 1.Speech CommunicationUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations