Advertisement

Semantic Cluster Labeling for Medical Relations

  • Anita AlicanteEmail author
  • Anna Corazza
  • Francesco Isgrò
  • Stefano Silvestri
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 60)

Abstract

In the context of the extraction of the semantic contents important for the effective exploitation of the documents which are now made available by medical information systems, we consider the processing of relations connecting named entities and propose an unsupervised approach to their recognition and labeling. The approach is applied to an Italian data set of medical reports, and interesting results are presented and discussed from a qualitative point of view.

Keywords

Feature Vector Cosine Similarity Entity Recognition Medical Information System Entity Pair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Alicante, A., Corazza, A., Isgrò, F., Silvestri, S.: Unsupervised entity and relation extraction from clinical records in Italian. Comput. Biol. Med. (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mikolov, T., Corrado, G., Chen, K., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2013), pp. 1–12 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shalev-Shwartz, S., Ben-David, S.: Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei, C., Peng, Y., Leaman, R., Davis, A., Mattingly, C., Li, J., Wiegers, T., Lu, Z.: Overview of the BioCreative V Chemical Disease Relation (CDR) task. In: Proceedings of the Fifth BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop, pp. 154–166 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suárez-Paniagua, V., Segura-Bedmar, I., Martínez, P.: Word embedding clustering for disease named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of the Fifth BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop, pp. 299–304 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashimoto, K., Stenetorp, P., Miwa, M., Tsuruoka, Y.: Task-oriented learning of word embeddings for semantic relation classification. In: Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL 2015, Beijing, China, July 30–31, pp. 268–278 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pianta, E., Girardi, C., Zanoli, R.: The TextPro tool suite. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08), Marrakech, Morocco, pp. 28–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 3111–3119 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Hoon, M.J., Imoto, S., Nolan, J., Miyano, S.: Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20, 1453–1454 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita Alicante
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anna Corazza
    • 1
  • Francesco Isgrò
    • 1
  • Stefano Silvestri
    • 2
  1. 1.Dip. di Ingegneria Elettrica e delle Tecnologie dell’Informazione (DIETI)Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINapoliItaly
  2. 2.Dip. di Medicina SperimentaleSeconda Università degli Studi di NapoliCasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations