Skip to main content

Occupy, Democracy, and Enduring Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Movements and Democracy in the 21st Century
  • 1064 Accesses

Abstract

Occupy may have begun as a response to an economic crisis, but this came to be seen simultaneously as a crisis of democracy. Occupy sought to challenge the financial elite’s capture of political power. While there was widespread agreement as to the nature of the problem faced, the question of “what is to be done” proved vexing. Arguments between reformist and “revolutionary” tendencies within Occupy echoed those of the nineteenth century, although this time the anarchist emphasis on spontaneity, horizontal organisation and total disengagement from the state proved hegemonic. The consensus-based decision model used by the movement favoured those who pursued a radical line. This came at the cost of the movement’s capacity to build an enduring popular base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anonymous. (2012). Activist intervention: Occupy—The end of the affair. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, T. (2014). A stroll in Zuccotti Park? Capital and Class, 38(1), 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (2014). Translating anarchy: The anarchism of Occupy Wall Street. Winchester: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, W. (2011). The battle of the Brooklyn Bridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2013). Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2012). Occupy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2013). On anarchism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2014). Power systems. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2013). Party in the USA: Optimism of the will. Retrieved 29 May, 2013, from http://ideanicite.typepad.com/i_cite/2013/05/party-in-the-us-optimism-of-the-will.html

  • Dean, J., Biebricher, T., & Celikates, R. (2012). Saying ‘We’ again: A conversation with Jodi Dean on democracy, occupy and communism. Retrieved 18 November, 2014, from http://criticallegalthinking.com/2012/11/06/saying-we-again-a-conversation-with-jodi-dean-on-democracy-occupy-and-communism

  • Dellacioppa, K., Soto, S., & Meyer, A. (2013). Rethinking resistance and the cultural politics of Occupy. New Political Science, 35(3), 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D. (2014). To make demands: Instituting the common or the abolition of value? In S. Brincat (Ed.), The future of communism: Social movements, economic crises, and the re-imagination of communism (Vol. 3). Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, B. (2001). Anarchism and the anti-globalisation movement. Monthly Review (September), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, B. (2012). Occupy Oakland: The question of violence. In L. Panitch, G. Albo, & V. Chibber (Eds.), Socialist register 2013: The question of strategy. Pontypool: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. (2012). To the precinct station. The Baffler, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, R. (1998). Narrative analysis-or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 517–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, R. (2010). Quantitative narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (c. 1973). The tyranny of structurelessness. Retrieved 01 August, 2013, from www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm

  • Fuchs, C. (2014). Occupy media! The Occupy movement and social media in crisis capitalism. Alresford: Zero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T. (2012). Occupy nation: The roots, the spirit, and the promise of Occupy Wall Street. New York: Itbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T. (2013). Occupy’s predicament: The moment and the prospects for the movement. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011a). Debt: The first 5000 years. New York: Melville House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011b). Enacting the impossible (On consensus decision making). Retrieved 06 May, 2013, from http://occupywallst.org/article/enacting-the-impossible/

  • Graeber, D. (2011c). Occupy Wall Street rediscovers the radical imagination. Retrieved 21 Jan, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/25/occupy-wall-street-protest

  • Graeber, D. (2012). Occupy Wall Street’s anarchist roots. In J. Byrne (Ed.), The Occupy handbook. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2013). The democracy project: A history, a crisis, a movement. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gude, S. (2012). Occupy anti-politics. Retrieved 24 November, 2013, from http://jacobinmag.com/2012/11/occupy-anti-politics/

  • Hickel, J. (2012). Liberalism and the politics of Occupy Wall Street. Anthropology of this Century, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S., Ronayne, M., Shokooh-Valle, F., & Wengronowitz, R. (2013). Negotiating power and difference in the 99%. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 434–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M., & Selchow, S. (2013). The ‘bubbling up’ of subterranean politics in Europe. Journal of Civil Society, 9(1), 78–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köksal, I. (2012). Walking in the city of London. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D., & Tufekci, Z. (2013). Occupy the political: Occupy Wall Street, collective action, and the rediscovery of pragmatic politics. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(3), 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2012). Is democracy still in the streets. In J. Byrne (Ed.), The Occupy handbook. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. (2012). Why do we obey? In F. Campangna & E. Campiglio (Eds.), What we are fighting for: A radical collective manifesto. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. (2011). Why wisconsin. In J. Nichols (Ed.), It started in Wisconsin: Dispatches from the new labour protest. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickerill, J., & Krinsky, J. (2012). Why does Occupy matter? Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehmann, J. (2013). Occupy Wall Street and the question of hegemony: A gramscian analysis. Socialism and Democracy, 27(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2012). Why occupy failed. Retrieved 23/07, 2012, from http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/occupy-failed-adbusters-on-year-anniversary/

  • Schneider, N. (2013). Thank you, anarchy: notes from the Occupy apocalypse. Berkerley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitrin, M. (2011). One no, many yeses. In A. Taylor & K. Gessen (Eds.), Occupy! Scenes from occupied America. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Glidden, B. (2012). Occupy Pittsburgh and the challenges of participatory democracy. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, R. (2011). Civil society at ground zero: You can crush the flowers, but you can’t stop the Spring. Retrieved 5 November, 2013, from http://www.geo.coop/node/761

  • Tejerina, B., Perugorría, I., Benski, T., & Langman, L. (2013). From indignation to occupation: A new wave of global mobilization. Current Sociology, 61(4), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Ekdale, B., Edgerly, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., Schrock, A.,…Wells, C. (2013). YouTube, Twitter and the occupy movement. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 421–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J., & Nicholls, W. (2012). How local networks shape a global movement: Comparing Occupy in Amsterdam and Los Angeles. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, T. (2005). Civil society in Mexico: Popular protest amid economic and political liberalisation. Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 25(1), 87–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1990). Antisystemic movements: History and dilemmas. In S. Amin, G. Arrighi, A. Gunder-Frank, & I. Wallerstein (Eds.), Transforming the revolution: Social movements and the world-system. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2011). Don’t fall in love with yourselves. In A. Taylor & K. Gessen (Eds.), Occupy! Scenes from occupied America. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, D. (2017). Occupy, Democracy, and Enduring Change. In: Social Movements and Democracy in the 21st Century . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39684-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39684-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39683-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39684-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics