Abstract
Eco-innovation should be identified as one of the main pillars for European countries, including those from the Central Eastern European (CEE) region. For this reason, the aim of this chapter is to present a comparative cross-country analysis of the relationship between eco-innovation and its main drivers for firms from selected CEE countries. The chapter provides a special insight into the role of public financial support and government regulations in stimulating eco-innovation performance. The empirical part is based on micro-data for CIS 2006–2008 for firms from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Romania and Germany. The results of stepwise regression show that financial support for innovation activities has rather limited role in fostering eco-innovation, whereas existing environmental regulations are regarded by enterprises from CEE region as their most important driver. In Germany, country ranked higher in Eco-Innovation Scoreboard than the other above mentioned countries, the spectrum of equally important forces is much more enhanced. This leads to the conclusion that government efforts have to cover not only changes in existing environmental policies, but set the ground for the creation of a legal and institutional environment which promotes a model of green economy.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The terms eco-innovation, environmental-friendly innovation, environmental innovation are used interchangeably in this chapter.
- 2.
The indicators in the Eco-Innovation Scoreboard are divided into five components covering eco-innovation inputs (including early stage investments in clean technology), eco-innovation activities (such as the percentage of firms taking resource efficiency measures), eco-innovation outputs (such as relevant patents), resource efficiency performance, and socio-economic outputs (such as data on turnover, employment and exports); for more information see: http://www.eco-innovation.eu.
- 3.
The 2013 version of the Eco-IS consists of 16 indicators from 9 different data sources, which were the same indicators used for the 2012 version; 13 indicators were updated, with most indicators having their latest values for the years between 2010 and 2012; for more information see: http://www.eco-innovation.eu.
- 4.
CIS 2008 micro data for 16 European countries (namely: BG-CY-CZ-DE-EE-ES-HU-IE-LT-LV-PT-RO-SI-SK-NO) obtained based on the “Contract on the use of Community Innovation Survey (CIS) micro data for research purposes – CIS/2012/13” signed on 18.10.2012 between European Commission Eurostat, Unit B1 and the Warsaw School of Economics.
- 5.
Results for Bulgarian, Czech Republic and German enterprises were very similar and are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2011). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Discussion paper, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (National Bureau of Economic Research, Conference Series, pp. 609–625). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17.
Belin, J., Horbach, V., & Oltra, V. (2011). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations – An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the Community Innovation Survey. Cahiers du GREThA, no. 2011–17.
Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credit works? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522.
Cace, C., Cace, S., & Nicolaescu, V. (2011). Absorption of the structural funds in Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 2, 84–105.
Cameron, T. J., Buisseret, H., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4–6), 587–600.
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.
CIS. (2008). Community Innovation Survey 2006–2008. Accessed April 10, 2014, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., & Palma, A. (2015). Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation in energy-efficient technologies. SEEDS Working Paper Series, 11/2015.
Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2), 217–229.
De Marchi, W. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41, 614–624.
Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. MPRA Paper, 44578. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44578
EC (European Commission). (2010). Europe 2020 – A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Accessed October 1, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020
Eco-Innovation Scoreboard. (2013). www.eco-innovation.eu
Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public Procurement and Innovation: Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36, 949–963.
EIO. (2010). Methodological report. Eco-innovation observatory. Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
EIO. (2012). The eco-innovation gap: An economic opportunity for business. Eco-innovation observatory. Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
Flanagan, K., Uyarraa, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the policy-mix for innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702–713.
Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 153–160.
Garcia, A., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Impact of government support on R&D and innovation. Unu-Merit Working Paper, 2010-034.
Gerlach, A. (2003). Sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation. Center for Sustainability Management, University of Lüneburg. In Proceedings from the 2003, Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Leeds, UK.
Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44, 1080–1093.
Grabowski, W., Pamukcu, T., Szczygielski, K., & Tandogan, S. (2013). Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from Turkey and Poland. CASE Network Studies & Analysis 458.
Halpern, L. (2010). R&D subsidies and firm performance in Hungary. Micro-Dyn Working Paper, 38/10.
Hemmelskamp, J. (1999). The influence of environmental policy on innovative behavior – An econometric study. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 18.99, Milan.
Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation – New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173.
Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2007). Panel-survey analysis of eco-innovation: Possibilities and propositions, deliverable 4 and 5 of MEI (measuring eco-innovation) project. Mannheim: MEI (Measuring eco-innovation) project.
Horbach, J., Oltra, V., & Belin, J. (2013). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations: An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the community innovation survey. Industry and Innovation, 20(6), 523–543. doi:10.1080/13662716.2013.833375.
Innovation Union Scoreboard. (2015). ec.europa.eu/…/innovation/…/scoreboards/…/ius-2015.
Kemp, R. (2000, June 19). Technology and environmental policy: Innovation effects of past policies and suggestions for improvement. Paper for OECD workshop on Innovation and Environment, Paris.
Kemp, R. (2011). Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe. S.A.P.I.EN.S., 4(2). http://sapiens.revues.org/1169
Kemp, R., & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics, 72, 28–36.
Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality in EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29(6), 711–724.
Luukkonen, T., & Niskanen, P. (1998). Learning through collaboration. Finnish participation in EU framework programmes. VTT, Group for Technology Studies, Espoo.
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 49, 297–306.
Norman, C., & Klofsten, M. (2010). Financing new ventures: Attitudes towards public innovation support. New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millennium, 8, 89–110.
OECD and Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. Joint publication by OECD and Eurostat.
OECD. (2009). Eco-innovation in industry: Enabling green growth. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2012). Tax incentives for research and development. OECD science technology and industry outlook 2012. Paris: OECD.
Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.
Paraskevopoulou, E. (2012). Non-technological regulatory effects: Implications for innovation and innovation policy. Research Policy, 41, 1058–1071.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.
Porter, M. (1991, April). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4).
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995a). Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive. Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 120–134.
Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.
Rennings, K., & Rexhäuser, S. (2011). Long-term impacts of environmental policy and eco-innovative activities of firms. International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, 11(3), 274–290.
Szymura-Tyc, M., & Bałoń, M. (2011). Ekoinnowacja jako przesłanka rekonfiguracji modelu biznesu. Zeszyty Naukowe. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, 169, 256–265.
UNEP. (2009, March). United Nations environment programme. Global green new deal. Policy Brief.
UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. http://unep.org/greeneconomy/
Veugelers, R. (2012). Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating? Research Policy, 41, 1770–1778.
Weresa, M. A., & Lewandowska, M. S. (2014). Innovation system restructuring in Poland in the context of EU membership. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Poland competitiveness report 2014: A decade in the European Union (pp. 171–191). Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.
Yarahmadi, M., & Higgins, P. G. (2012). Motivations towards environmental innovation. A conceptual framework for multiparty cooperation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 400–420.
Yoon, E., & Tello, S. (2009). Drivers of sustainable innovation. Seoul Journal of Business, 15(2), 85–115.
Acknowledgment
This chapter was supported with funds provided by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the World Economy Research Institute—a unit of the Collegium of the World Economy at the Warsaw School of Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewandowska, M.S. (2016). Policies to Promote Eco-innovation: Results for Selected CEE Countries and Germany. In: Trąpczyński, P., Puślecki, Ł., Jarosiński, M. (eds) Competitiveness of CEE Economies and Businesses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39654-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39654-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39653-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39654-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)