Advertisement

Policies to Promote Eco-innovation: Results for Selected CEE Countries and Germany

  • Małgorzata Stefania Lewandowska
Chapter

Abstract

Eco-innovation should be identified as one of the main pillars for European countries, including those from the Central Eastern European (CEE) region. For this reason, the aim of this chapter is to present a comparative cross-country analysis of the relationship between eco-innovation and its main drivers for firms from selected CEE countries. The chapter provides a special insight into the role of public financial support and government regulations in stimulating eco-innovation performance. The empirical part is based on micro-data for CIS 2006–2008 for firms from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Romania and Germany. The results of stepwise regression show that financial support for innovation activities has rather limited role in fostering eco-innovation, whereas existing environmental regulations are regarded by enterprises from CEE region as their most important driver. In Germany, country ranked higher in Eco-Innovation Scoreboard than the other above mentioned countries, the spectrum of equally important forces is much more enhanced. This leads to the conclusion that government efforts have to cover not only changes in existing environmental policies, but set the ground for the creation of a legal and institutional environment which promotes a model of green economy.

Keywords

Central and Eastern Europe Innovation and R&D Factor analysis Eco-innovation Environmental regulations CIS 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This chapter was supported with funds provided by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the World Economy Research Institute—a unit of the Collegium of the World Economy at the Warsaw School of Economics.

References

  1. Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2011). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Discussion paper, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (National Bureau of Economic Research, Conference Series, pp. 609–625). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belin, J., Horbach, V., & Oltra, V. (2011). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations – An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the Community Innovation Survey. Cahiers du GREThA, no. 2011–17.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credit works? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cace, C., Cace, S., & Nicolaescu, V. (2011). Absorption of the structural funds in Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 2, 84–105.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, T. J., Buisseret, H., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4–6), 587–600.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CIS. (2008). Community Innovation Survey 2006–2008. Accessed April 10, 2014, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
  11. Costantini, V., Crespi, F., & Palma, A. (2015). Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation in energy-efficient technologies. SEEDS Working Paper Series, 11/2015.Google Scholar
  12. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Marchi, W. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41, 614–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. MPRA Paper, 44578. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44578
  15. EC (European Commission). (2010). Europe 2020 – A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Accessed October 1, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020
  16. Eco-Innovation Scoreboard. (2013). www.eco-innovation.eu
  17. Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public Procurement and Innovation: Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36, 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EIO. (2010). Methodological report. Eco-innovation observatory. Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.Google Scholar
  19. EIO. (2012). The eco-innovation gap: An economic opportunity for business. Eco-innovation observatory. Funded by the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Flanagan, K., Uyarraa, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the policy-mix for innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garcia, A., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Impact of government support on R&D and innovation. Unu-Merit Working Paper, 2010-034.Google Scholar
  23. Gerlach, A. (2003). Sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation. Center for Sustainability Management, University of Lüneburg. In Proceedings from the 2003, Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44, 1080–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grabowski, W., Pamukcu, T., Szczygielski, K., & Tandogan, S. (2013). Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from Turkey and Poland. CASE Network Studies & Analysis 458.Google Scholar
  26. Halpern, L. (2010). R&D subsidies and firm performance in Hungary. Micro-Dyn Working Paper, 38/10.Google Scholar
  27. Hemmelskamp, J. (1999). The influence of environmental policy on innovative behavior – An econometric study. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 18.99, Milan.Google Scholar
  28. Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation – New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2007). Panel-survey analysis of eco-innovation: Possibilities and propositions, deliverable 4 and 5 of MEI (measuring eco-innovation) project. Mannheim: MEI (Measuring eco-innovation) project.Google Scholar
  30. Horbach, J., Oltra, V., & Belin, J. (2013). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations: An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the community innovation survey. Industry and Innovation, 20(6), 523–543. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2013.833375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Innovation Union Scoreboard. (2015). ec.europa.eu/…/innovation/…/scoreboards/…/ius-2015.Google Scholar
  32. Kemp, R. (2000, June 19). Technology and environmental policy: Innovation effects of past policies and suggestions for improvement. Paper for OECD workshop on Innovation and Environment, Paris.Google Scholar
  33. Kemp, R. (2011). Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe. S.A.P.I.EN.S., 4(2). http://sapiens.revues.org/1169
  34. Kemp, R., & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics, 72, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality in EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29(6), 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luukkonen, T., & Niskanen, P. (1998). Learning through collaboration. Finnish participation in EU framework programmes. VTT, Group for Technology Studies, Espoo.Google Scholar
  37. Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 49, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Norman, C., & Klofsten, M. (2010). Financing new ventures: Attitudes towards public innovation support. New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millennium, 8, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD and Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. Joint publication by OECD and Eurostat.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (2009). Eco-innovation in industry: Enabling green growth. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  42. OECD. (2012). Tax incentives for research and development. OECD science technology and industry outlook 2012. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paraskevopoulou, E. (2012). Non-technological regulatory effects: Implications for innovation and innovation policy. Research Policy, 41, 1058–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Porter, M. (1991, April). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4).Google Scholar
  47. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995a). Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive. Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 120–134.Google Scholar
  49. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rennings, K., & Rexhäuser, S. (2011). Long-term impacts of environmental policy and eco-innovative activities of firms. International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, 11(3), 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Szymura-Tyc, M., & Bałoń, M. (2011). Ekoinnowacja jako przesłanka rekonfiguracji modelu biznesu. Zeszyty Naukowe. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, 169, 256–265.Google Scholar
  52. UNEP. (2009, March). United Nations environment programme. Global green new deal. Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  53. UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. http://unep.org/greeneconomy/
  54. Veugelers, R. (2012). Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating? Research Policy, 41, 1770–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weresa, M. A., & Lewandowska, M. S. (2014). Innovation system restructuring in Poland in the context of EU membership. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Poland competitiveness report 2014: A decade in the European Union (pp. 171–191). Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.Google Scholar
  56. Yarahmadi, M., & Higgins, P. G. (2012). Motivations towards environmental innovation. A conceptual framework for multiparty cooperation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 400–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yoon, E., & Tello, S. (2009). Drivers of sustainable innovation. Seoul Journal of Business, 15(2), 85–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SGH Warsaw School of EconomicsWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations