Skip to main content

Vulnerability of Passenger Transportation System—The Main Information Provided by Key Stakeholders. Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dependability Engineering and Complex Systems (DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 470))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1063 Accesses

Abstract

In the presented paper, authors focus on the issues connected with passenger transportation system vulnerability assessment. Following this, in the article the authors investigate the problem of information needs that make possible a full risk analysis performance for municipal transport system. Thus, there is presented a short literature review connected with assessment methods used in the analysed research area. There are also defined the main definitions. This gives the possibility to define the main information system that meets of vulnerability performance. There is also given an analysis aimed at investigation of potential use of vulnerability analysis results by public transport stakeholders. Article ends with some conclusions and directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balijepalli, Ch., Oppong, O.: Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas. J. Transp. Geogr. 39, 145–155 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berdica, K.: An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transp. Policy 9, 117–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cats, O., Jenelius, E.: Beyond a complete failure: the impact of partial capacity reductions on public transport network vulnerability. In: The 6th International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR), Japan, pp. 1–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crisis Management Centre. http://bip.um.wroc.pl/artykul/100/3226/centrum-zarzadzania-kryzysowego. Accessed 27 Jan 2016

  5. Dajani, J.S., Gilbert, G.: Measuring the performance of transit systems. Transp. Plann. Tech. 4, 97–103 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Rashidy, R.A., Grant-Muller, S.M.: An assessment method for highway network vulnerability. J. Transp. Geogr. 34, 34–43 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erath, A., Birdsall, J., Axhausen, K.W., Hajdin, R.: Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2137, 118–126 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/. Accessed 27 Jan 2016

  9. Fricker, J.D., Whitford, R.K.: Fundamentals of Transportation Engineering. A Multimodal Systems Approach. Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. INVAPO WP5 5.4.6.: Technical, economical and environmental studies of Vistula river revitalization and navigability restoration on Warsaw-Gdansk tour. Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacyna, M.: Modelling and assessment of transportation systems (in Polish). Publishing House of Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jenelius, E.: Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. J. Transp. Geogr. 17(3), 234–244 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jodejko-Pietruczuk, A., Plewa, M.: Reliability based model of the cost effective product reusing policy. In: Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications—Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2014, pp. 1243–1248, Taylor & Leiden (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson, J., Hassel, H.: An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 1335–1344 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kierzkowski, A., Kisiel, T.: The simulation model of logistic support for functioning ground handling agent, taking into account the probabilistic time of aircrafts arrival. In: CLC 2013: Carpathian Logistics Congress—Congress Proceedings, pp. 463–469, Tanger LTd. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kierzkowski, A., Kisiel, T.: Functional readiness of the security control system at an airport with single-report streams. In: Theory and Engineering of Complex Systems and Dependability: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, June 29–July 3 2015, Brunów, Poland, Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kisiel, T., Valis, D., Zak, L.: Application of regression function—two areas for technical system operation assessment. In: CLC 2013: Carpathian Logistics Congress—Congress Proceedings, Tanger LTd. pp. 500–505 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mattsson, L.-G., Jenelius, E.: Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems—a discussion of recent research. Transp. Res. Part A 81, 16–34 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Napper, R.: Route bus transport—stakeholders, vehicles and new design directions. In: Proceedings of the 29th Conference of Australian Institutes of Transport Research, Adelaide (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ouyang, M., Pan, Z., Hong, L., He, Y.: Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 142, 248–257 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Proper, J.W.: How to manage resilience in public transport organizations (2011). www.cvs-congres.nl/cvspdfdocs/cvs11_031.pdf

  22. Reggiani, A., Nijkamp, R., Lanzi, D.: Transport resilience and vulnerability: the role of connectivity. Transp. Res. Part A 81, 4–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Restel F.J.: Defining States in Reliability and Safety Modelling. In: Theory and Engineering of Complex Systems and Dependability: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, June 29–July 3, 2015, pp. 413–423, Brunów, Poland, Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodrigues-Nunez, E., Garcia-Palomares, J.C.: Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks. J. Transp. Geogr. 35, 50–63 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Susnienie, D., Jurkauskas, A.: Stakeholder approach in the management of public transport companies. Transport 23(3), 214–220 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor, M.A.P., D’Este, G.M.: Transport network vulnerability: a method for diagnosis of critical locations in transport infrastructure systems. In: Murray A.T., Grubesic T.H. (eds.) Critical Infrastructure. Reliability and Vulnerability, Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tsolakis, D., Thoresen, T.: A framework for demonstrating that road performance meets community expectations. Road Transp. Res. 7(3), 79–85 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tubis, A., Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S.: Issues on vulnerabilility of passenger transportation system (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School of Reliability: Reliability of technical systems, 10th–16th January, 2016, Szczyrk, Poland, Publishing House of Warsaw University of Technology (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Z., Chan, A.P., Yuan, J., Xia, B., Skitmore, M., Li, Q.: Recent advances in modelling the vulnerability of transportation networks. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21, 2 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zając, M.: Principles of work load in intermodal transhipment point. In: CLC 2013: Carpathian Logistics Congress—Congress Proceedings, pp. 685–690, Tanger LTd. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zajac, M., Swieboda, J.: An Unloading Work Model at an Intermodal Terminal. In: Theory and Engineering of Complex Systems and Dependability: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, June 29–July 3 2015, pp. 573–582, Brunów, Poland, Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu, S., Levinson, D. M.: Disruptions to transportation networks: a review. In: Levinson, D.M., Liu, H.X., Bell, M. (eds.) Network Reliability in Practice. Selected Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability, pp. 5–20. Springer, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zurek, J., Smalko, Z., Zieja, M.: Methods applied to identify causes of air events. In: Bris, R., Soares, C.G., Martorell, S. (eds.) Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Applications, pp. 1817–1822. Taylor & Francis (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Tubis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tubis, A., Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S. (2016). Vulnerability of Passenger Transportation System—The Main Information Provided by Key Stakeholders. Case Study. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Dependability Engineering and Complex Systems. DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 470. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39639-2_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39639-2_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39638-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39639-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics