Abstract
This chapter offers a conceptual analysis of the secularization paradigm as it was constructed by the dominant sociological fathers and the reception hereof. The reason for this is that an examination of the failure of secularization theories should lead to significant discussions in the field of sociology. Broadly speaking, the conceptual analysis points to the establishment of sociology, especially in Auguste Comte and Emile Durkheim’s case, through a complete empiricist break with the natural law tradition. Through empiricism, earlier writers such as Thomas Hobbes that paid great attention to the state were dismissed completely. Sociology as well as international relations emerged as independent disciplines and were little concerned with each other. In the case of sociology, empiricism contributed to the establishment of sociology as an independent and self-sufficient discipline. The conceptual analysis suggests that the study of secularization might benefit if much more attention were paid to the fundamental conceptual framework, especially the agency of the state and interreligious agency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Weber shared this overall engagement with the British evolutionists, for instance, Edward Tylor and Herbert Spencer. To this extent, Weber’s Protestant Ethic is a reaction to the twentieth -century European experience.
- 2.
Or, in Weber’s, case groupings of individuals.
References
Assmann, J. (2007). Monotheism and its political consequences. In P. Beyer & L. G. Beaman (Eds.), Religion, globalization and culture. Leiden: Brill.
Berger, P. L. (1969). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books Doubleday & Company.
Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the west. Malden: Blackwell.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Comte, A. (1975). August Comte and positivism, the essential writings. New York: Harper Torchbook.
Dobbelaere, K. (2002). Secularization: An analysis at three levels. Bruxelles: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
Durkheim, E. (1938). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.
Durkheim, E. (1957). Professional ethics and civic morals. London: Routledge & Paul.
Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
Finke, R. (1990). Religious deregulation: Origins and consequences. Journal of Church and State, 323, 609–637.
Finke, R., & Stark, R. (1992). The churching of America, 1776–1990: Winners and losers in our religious economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. New York: Picador.
Giddens, A. (1985). The nation-state and violence, volume 2 of a contemporary critique of historical materialism. London: Polity.
Gorski, P. S., & Altinordu, A. (2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85.
Gumplowicz, L. (1885). Grundriss der Sociology. Wien: Manz.
Hadden, J. (1987). Toward desacralizing secularization theory. Social Forces, 65, 587–611.
Højrup, T. (2003). State, culture, and life-modes the foundations of life-mode analysis. Burlington: Ashgate.
Hughey, M. W. (1979). The idea of secularization in the works of Max Weber: A theoretical outline. Qualitative Sociology, 2(1), 85–111.
Joas, H. (2003). War and modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kaspersen, L. B. (2002). The “warfare-paradigm” in historical sociology: Warfare as a driving historical force. Distinktion, 32, 101–124.
Kilpinen, E. (2004). How to fight the ‘Methodenstreit’? Veblen and Weber on economics, psychology and action. International Review of Sociology, 143, 413–432.
Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action; A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Parsons, T. (1954). Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe: Free Press.
Riesebrodt, M. (2005). Dimensions of the protestant ethic. In W. Swatos & K. Lutz (Eds.), The protestant ethic turns 100: Essays on the centenary of the Weber thesis. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Rueschemeyer, D. (1982). On Durkheim’s division of labor. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 579–589.
Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spencer, H. (1967). The evolution of society; Selections from Herbert Spencer’s principles of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stark, R., & Iannacone, L. R. (1994). A supply-side reinterpretation of the secularization of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 333, 230–252.
Swatos, W. H., & Christiano, K. J. (1999). Introduction — Secularization theory: The course of a concept. Sociologi of Religion, 603, 209–228.
Swedberg, R. (1998). Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Abhandlung d. Communismus u. d. Socialismus als empirischer Culturformen. Leipzig: Fues.
Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and civil society (Cambridge texts in the history of political thought). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tschannen, O. (1991). The secularization paradigm: A systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 304, 395–415.
Weber, M. (1904). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Weber, M. (1920). Gesammelte aufsätze zur religionssoziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons with a foreword by R.H. Tawney. New York/London: Charles Scribner and Sons/George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Wilson, B. R. (1976). Aspects of secularization in the west. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 3, 259–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reeh, N. (2016). The Blind Spots of the Dominant Secularization Theories. In: Secularization Revisited - Teaching of Religion and the State of Denmark. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39608-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39608-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39606-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39608-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)