Advertisement

Experience Flow Mapping: Gaining Insights in Designing Tools to Support Low-Sodium Diet

  • Idowu Ayoola
  • Adriaan de Regt
  • Mart Wetzels
  • Sander van Berlo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9677)

Abstract

This paper introduces a through experience flow study wherein the participants are followed throughout their groceries, cooking and eating activities to map out their experiences. The goal is to help a couple to understand their experiences in preparing a challenging meal and at the same time, keeping a low sodium diet. The ultimate goal is to develop dietary tools that can support the self-management of chronic patients. This work helps us to gain new insights to develop further three design concepts (e.g., a cooking utensil to track sodium intake, a spectrometer device to measure the nutritional content of foods and tableware to measure food whilst serving or eating). We describe the method adopted, and the results are discussed.

Keywords

Sodium Intake Experience Flow Unhealthy Food Grocery Shopping Dinner Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We like to thank the two participants for spending their time and for providing so much feedback during and after the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Eu salt reduction framework (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayoola, I.: Experience flow diagram for understanding cooking experience (2016). https://goo.gl/fCnfVl
  3. 3.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Do CHANGE: Do cardiac health advance new generation ecosystem. http://www.do-change.eu. Accessed 15 Feb 2016
  5. 5.
    Forouzanfar, M.H., Alexander, L., Anderson, H.R., Bachman, V.F., Biryukov, S., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Casey, D., Coates, M.M., Cohen, A., et al.: Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet 386(10010), 2287–2323 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gatley, A., Caraher, M., Lang, T.: A qualitative, cross cultural examination of attitudes and behaviour in relation to cooking habits in france and britain. Appetite 75, 71–81 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koufaris, M.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(2), 205–223 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lorig, K.R., Sobel, D.S., Ritter, P.L., Laurent, D., Hobbs, M.: Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clin. Pract. ECP 4(6), 256–262 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall, D.W.: Food Choice and the Consumer. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Philips: Experience flows, 4 May 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sommer, B., Sommer, R.: A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research: Tools and Techniques. Oxford University Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valentine, G.: Eating in: home, consumption and identity. Sociol. Rev. 47(3), 491–524 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Idowu Ayoola
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adriaan de Regt
    • 2
  • Mart Wetzels
    • 1
  • Sander van Berlo
    • 2
  1. 1.Technology University of EindhovenEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Onmi B.V.EindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations