Advertisement

Comparing Wireless Traffic Tracking with Regular Traffic Control Systems for the Detection of Congestions in Streets

  • Antonio Fernández-AresEmail author
  • Maribel García Arenas
  • Antonio M. Mora
  • Pedro A. Castillo
  • J. J. Merelo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9704)

Abstract

Detecting congestions on streets is one of the main issues in the area of smart cities. Regular monitoring methods can supply information about the number of vehicles in transit and thus the saturation of the streets, but they are usually expensive and intrusive with respect to the road. In recent years a new trend in traffic detection has arisen, considering the Wireless signals emitted by ‘smart’ on-board devices for counting and tracking vehicles. In this paper, two traffic monitoring methods are compared: detections using a regular Inductive Loop Detector on the road and an own Wireless Tracking System based on Bluetooth detection called Mobywit. The correlation between the day of the week and the hour with the traffic flow in a metropolitan busy street has been analysed. Assuming that our system is not able to defect all the vehicles, but just only subset of them, it is expected a causality between the results obtained using the two methods. This means, that the Bluetooth-based system can detect the same variations in the traffic flow that the regular loop detector, but having two main advantages: the tracking possibilities and a much lower cost.

Keywords

Smart cities Traffic monitoring Traffic tracking Bluetooth detection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported in part by project MOSOS (reference PRY142/14), which has been granted by Fundación Pública Andaluza Centro de Estudios Andaluces in the call ‘IX Convocatoria de Proyectos de Investigación’. It also has been partially funded by national projects TIN2014-56494-C4-3-P and TEC2015-68752 (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness), PROY-PP2015-06 (Plan Propio 2015 UGR), and project CEI2015-MP-V17 of the Microprojects program 2015 from CEI BioTIC Granada.

We also thank the DGT and local council of Granada city, and their staff and researchers for their dedication and professionalism.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnott, R., Palma, A.D., Lindsey, R.: Does providing information to drivers reduce traffic congestion? Transp. Res. Part A Gen. 25(5), 309–318 (1991). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019126079190146H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., Portugali, Y.: Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214(1), 481–518 (2012). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carnes, P.: TraffaxInc. http://www.TraffaxInc.com/
  4. 4.
    Castillo, P., Fernández-Ares, A., García-Fernández, P., García-Sánchez, P., Arenas, M., Mora, A., Rivas, V., Asensio, J., Romero, G., Merelo, J.: Studying individualized transit indicators using a new low-cost information system. In: Handbook of Research on Embedded Systems Design. Industry and Research Perspectives on Embedded System Design, pp. 388–407. IGI Global (2014). Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance ComputingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    FMM: System and method for monitoring people and/or vehicles in urban environments (May 2011). EP Patent App. EP20,080,805,357, http://www.google.com/patents/EP2325823A1?cl=en
  6. 6.
    Granger, C.: Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 2, 329–352 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kostakos, V.: Using bluetooth to capture passenger trips on public transport buses (2008). arXiv:0806.0874
  8. 8.
    Martin, P.T., Feng, Y., Wang, X., et al.: Detector technology evaluation. Technical report, Mountain-Plains Consortium (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menéndez, J.: Kilómetros a precio de Oro. DGT - Tráfico Noviembre-Diciembre, pp. 31–34 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morrison, A., Bell, M., Chalmers, M.: Visualisation of spectator activity at stadium events. In: 2009 13th International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 219–226. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nicolai, T., Kenn, H.: About the relationship between people and discoverable bluetooth devices in urban environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile technology, applications, and systems and the 1st international symposium on Computer human interaction in mobile technology. pp. 72–78. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramos, A., Ferreira, J., Barceló, J.: Intelligent urban traffic: a guide through micro modelling approaches. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 2767–2772. IEEE, Anchorage, October 2011Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richard, A., Small, K.: The economics of traffic congestion. Am. Sci. 82(5), 446–455 (1994). http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775281 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodrigue, J.P., Comtois, C., Slack, B.: The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rahane, S.K., Saharkar, U.R.: Traffic congestion - causes and solutions: a study of talegaon Dabhade city. J. Inf. Knowl. Res. Civil Eng. 3(1), 160–163 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Skszek, S.L.: “state-of-the-art” report on non-traditional traffic counting methods. Technical report, Arizona Department of Transportation (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    TierpointLLC: Trafficnow. http://www.trafficnow.com/
  18. 18.
    Vilajosana, I.: BitCarrier. Go With the Flow. http://www.bitcarrier.com/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Fernández-Ares
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maribel García Arenas
    • 1
  • Antonio M. Mora
    • 1
  • Pedro A. Castillo
    • 1
  • J. J. Merelo
    • 1
  1. 1.ETSIIT-CITICUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations