The Bright and Dark Sides of Gamification

  • Fernando R. H. Andrade
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
  • Seiji Isotani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9684)


Everything in life has a bright and a dark side; and gamification is not an exception. Although there is an increasing number of publications discussing the benefits of gamification in learning environments, i.e. looking into the bright side of it, several issues can hinder learning because of gamification. Nevertheless, it seems that only few researchers are discussing the dark side of using gamification in learning environments and how to overcome it. Thus, in this paper, we discuss some of the problems of gamification, namely, addiction, undesired competition, and off-task behavior. Furthermore, to deal with both bright and dark sides of gamification at the same time, we propose a framework for intelligent gamification (FIG) that can offer the necessary infrastructure for ITS to personalize the use of gamification by monitoring risk behavior, exploring how best use game design elements to avoid their overuse and finally supporting “fading” mechanisms that gradually reduces the use of gamification and help students to concentrate on learning and not only on extrinsic motivators.


Gamification Intelligent tutoring systems Addiction Framework 



We thank CNPq and CAPES for supporting this research.


  1. 1.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 3025–3034 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Challco, G.C., Andrade, F.R.H., Oliveira, T., Isotani, S.: Towards an ontological model to apply gamification as persuasive technology in collaborative learning scenarios. In: Proceedings of the Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, pp. 499–508 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pedro, L.Z., Lopes, A.M.Z., Prates, B.G., Vassileva, J., Isotani, S.: Does gamification work for boys and girls? An exploratory study with a virtual learning environment. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 214–219 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., Pagés, C.: An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Comput. Educ. 75, 82–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmitt, Z.L., Livingston, M.G.: Video game addiction and college performance among males: results from a 1 year longitudinal study. CyberPsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. 18, 25–29 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeong, E.J., Lee, H.R.: Addictive use due to personality: focused on big five personality traits and game addiction. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 9(6), 1995–1999 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borges, S., Reis, H.M., Durelli, V., Isotani, S.: A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 216–222 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kapp, K.M.: The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huotari, K., Hamari, J.: Defining gamification - a service marketing perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Academic MindTrek Conference, pp. 17–22 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monterrat, B., Lavoué, É., George, S.: A framework to adapt gamification in learning environments. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 578–579 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ryan, R., Deci, E.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aparicio, A.F., Vela, F.L.G., Sánchez, J.L.G., Montes, J.L.I.: Analysis and application of gamification. In: International Conference on Interacción Persona-Ordenador, pp. 1–2 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maragos, K., Grigoriadou, M.: Towards the design of intelligent educational gaming systems. In: Proceedings of the AIED Workshops, pp. 35–38 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nah, F.F.-H., Eschenbrenner, B., DeWester, D., Park, S.R.: Impact of flow and brand equity in 3D virtual worlds. J. Database Manag. 21, 69–89 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Challco, G.C., Andrade, F.R.H., Borges, S.S., Bittencourt, I.I., Isotani, S.: Toward a unified modeling of learner’s growth process and flow theory. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(2), 1–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun, Y.Y., Zhao, Y., Jia, S., Zheng, D.: Understanding the antecedents of mobile game addiction: the roles of perceived visibility, perceived enjoyment and flow. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, p. 141 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chou, T., Ting, C.: The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. CyberPsychology Behav. 6(6), 663–675 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baker, R.S.J., Walonoski, J., Heffernan, N., et al.: Why students engage in “gaming the system” behavior in interactive learning environments. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 19(2), 185–224 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wongso, O., Rosmansyah, Y., Bandung, Y.: Gamification framework model, based on social engagement in e-learning 2.0. In: International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering, and Environment, pp. 10–14 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simões, J., Redondo, R.D., Vilas, A.F.: A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 345–353 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsych Behav. 9, 772–775 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nacke, L.E., Bateman, C., Mandryk, R.L.: BrainHex: preliminary results from a neurobiological gamer typology survey. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Entertainment Computing, pp. 288–293 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44(1), 1–26 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Myers, I.B., McCaulley, M.H., Quenk, N.L., Hammer, A.L.: MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ueno, M., Miyasawa, Y.: Probability based scaffolding system with fading. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M.F. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS, vol. 9112, pp. 492–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando R. H. Andrade
    • 1
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
    • 2
  • Seiji Isotani
    • 1
  1. 1.ICMCUniversity of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Japan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyIshikawaJapan

Personalised recommendations