Advertisement

A Practical Evaluation of the Influence of Input Devices on Playability

  • Lucas Machado
  • João Luiz BernardesJr.
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9733)

Abstract

Innovations being achieved with interactive devices (screens, sensors etc.) allow the development of new forms of interaction for many applications. Videogames played with these devices are completely changing how we use them and taking advantage of intuitive interfaces. Based on that, we ask “What aspects of playability are affected using different input devices for a certain gaming task and how is gaming performance affected?”. Our contribution is to present a practical evaluation of four different input devices (Mouse, Gamepad, Kinect and Touchscreen) used to interact with the same game, Fruit Ninja, with our data analysis indicating that changing input device brings significant differences in certain aspects of player experience for this game, such as sensation, challenge and control, while for others there was very little difference since this particular game rarely provides intense experiences for those aspects.

Keywords

Emotions in HCI Entertainment systems Evaluation methods and techniques User experience Input devices 

References

  1. 1.
    Makuch, E.: Video game industry grows four times faster than US economy, ESA says (2014). http://www.gamespot.com/articles/video-game-industry-grows-four-times-faster-than-u/1100-6423536/
  2. 2.
    Lucero, A., Holopainen, J., Ollila, E., Suomela, R., Karapanos, E.: The playful experiences (plex) framework as a guide for expert evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI 2013, p. 221 (2013). doi: 10.1145/2513506.2513530, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?d=2513506.2513530
  3. 3.
    Paavilainen, J.: Critical review on video game evaluation heuristics. In: Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, pp. 56–65 (2010). doi: 10.1145/1920778.1920787, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1920787
  4. 4.
    Turner-Bowker, D.M., Saris-Baglama, R.N., Smith, K.J., DeRosa, M.A., Paulsen, C.A., Hogue, S.J.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Telemed. J. e-Health Official J. Am. Telemed. Assoc. 17, 40–45 (1990). doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0114. CHI 2009. http://online.liebertpub.com//abs/10.1089/tmj.2010.0114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonarini, A., Costa, F., Garbarino, M., Matteucci, M., Romero, M., Tognetti, S.: Affective videogames: the problem of wearability and comfort. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part IV, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6764, pp. 649–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21619-0-77 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alvarez, J., Haudegond, S., Havrez, C., Kolski, C., Lebrun, Y., Lepreux, S., Libessart, A.: From screens to devices and tangible objects: a framework applied to serious games characterization. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8512, pp. 559–570. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07227-2-53 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, H., Chung, D.: Influence of gaming display and controller on perceived characteristics, perceived interactivity, presence, and discomfort. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII/HCI 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8005, pp. 258–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7-29 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, A.F.: Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1509–1512 (2004). doi: 10.1145/985921.986102, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?d=985921.986102
  9. 9.
    Koeffel, C., Hochleitner, W., Leitner, J., Haller, M., Geven, A., Tscheligi, M.: Using heuristics to evaluate the overall user experience of video games and advanced interaction games. In: Bernhaupt, R. (ed.) Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods, pp. 233–256. Springer, London (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chu, K., Wong, C.Y., Khong, C.W.: Methodologies for evaluating player experience in game play. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Posters, Part I, HCII 2011. CCIS, vol. 173, pp. 118–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22098-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities (EACH)Universidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations