Advertisement

Teaching Virtual Reality with Affordable Technologies

  • Nancy RodriguezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9731)

Abstract

In 2004, G.C. Burdea published his article Teaching Virtual Reality: Why and How? He pointed out that the reduced offer of Virtual Reality courses could be explained by the requirement of specialized and expensive equipment. Even if a VR course could only focus on theoretical principles, hands-on learning allows to increase and clarify knowledge and to directly experience –and then better understand- several concepts as immersion, natural interfaces or motion sickness. At the present time, digital entertainment industry renewal has fostered the development of low cost devices for virtual reality. These affordable technologies as a BYOD approach are used in the « open VR Lab » of the Computer Science department at University of Montpellier. In this paper, the VR Lab as well as our course Vision and Augmented/Virtual Reality are described in detail.

Keywords

Virtual reality Augmented reality Computer vision Interaction devices Display devices VR laboratory Higher education Practical course 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank all the HMIN320 2015 students for their work and feedback. Special thanks to Christophe Dauphin, Bastien Herbaut and Robin Herbaut for have kindly agreed to appear in the VR Lab photo.

References

  1. 1.
    Burdea, G.C.: Teaching Virtual Reality: Why and How? Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 13(4), 463–483 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World-wide Survey of Universities Teaching Virtual Reality, http://vrtechnology.org/resources/public/survey.html
  3. 3.
    Häfner P., Häfner V., Ovtcharova J.: Teaching Methodology for Virtual Reality Practical Course in Engineering Education. In: 2013 International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education. Procedia Computer Science 25, 251 – 260 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    OSVR Hacker Development Kit. http://www.osvr.org
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Meet Kinect for Windows. https://dev.windows.com/en-us/kinect
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Watson, D.: Education Inf. Technologies 5(4), 231–232 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Fifth Dimension Technologies Data Gloves. http://www.5dt.com/?page_id=34
  13. 13.
    Burdea, G., Coiffet, P.: Virtual Reality Technology. Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 12(6), 663–664 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Araullo, J., Potter, L.E.: Experiences Using Emerging Technology. In: OzCHI 2014 Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (CHISIG), Sydney, Australia (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caputo, F.M.: Evaluation of basic object manipulation modes for low-cost immersive virtual reality. In: Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI, CHITALY 2015, pp. 74–77. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Desai, P.R., Desai, P.N., Ajmera, K.D., Mehta, K.: A review paper on oculus rift - a virtual reality headset. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 13(4), 175–179 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whitman, L., Malzahn, D., Madhavan, V., Weheba, G., Krishnan, K.: Virtual reality case study throughout the curriculum to address competency gaps. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 20(5), 690–702 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cliburn D.C., Miller J.R., Doherty, M.E.: The design and evaluation of online lesson units for teaching virtual reality to undergraduates. In: 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference FECS, pp. F3F-1-F3F-6 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRSMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations