Advertisement

Knowledge-Oriented Selection of Usability Engineering Methods for Mobility Scenarios

  • Luise Künnemann
  • Stephan Hörold
  • Heidi KrömkerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9731)

Abstract

Different areas of application and scenarios necessitate different sets of usability engineering methods. The selection of these methods depends on a variety of conditions. This paper presents a new approach for selecting and combining usability engineering methods, dependent on individual conditions of the corresponding method, company-based and product-specific measures as well as an analysis of the knowledge in the area of application. The approach is exemplarily presented for the mobility and transportation sector, focusing on the knowledge-based selection of methods for mobility scenarios.

Keywords

Usability engineering methods Framework Mobility scenarios 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper has been prepared within the scope of a PhD thesis which is funded by the Thüringer Graduiertenförderung, in the form of a doctoral scholarship.

References

  1. 1.
    Hörold, S., Mayas, C., Krömker, H.: User-oriented development of information systems in public transport. In: Anderson, M. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayas, C., Hörold, S., Krömker, H.: Meeting the challenges of individual passenger information with personas. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation, pp. 822–831. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hörold, S., Mayas, C., Krömker, H.: Passenger needs on mobile information systems – field evaluation in public transport. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation Part III, AHFE Conference Proceedings, pp. 115–124 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego/London (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schweibenz, W., Thissen, F.: Qualität im Web: Benutzerfreundliche Webseiten durch Usability Evaluation. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haas, R.: Usability Engineering in der E-Collaboration: Ein managementorientierter Ansatz für virtuelle Teams (Habilitationsschrift). Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., Alexander, L.: In-Depth Interviewing: Researching people. Longman Cheshire, Melbourne (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siegel, D.: Usability for engaged users: the naturalistic approach to evaluation. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, 3rd edn, pp. 1243–1257. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas, B.: ‘Quick and dirty’ usability tests. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 107–114. Taylor & Francis Ltd., London (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sarodnick, F., Brau, H.: Methoden der Usability Evaluation: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (2., überarb. u. aktual. Aufl.). Bern, Verlag Hans Huber (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karat, C.-M.: A comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods, pp. 203–233. Wiley, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schriver, K.: Evaluating text quality: the continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 32(4), 238–255 (1989). doi: 10.1109/47.44536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dumas, J.S., Redish, J.: A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, Revised edn. Intellect Ltd, Exeter/Portland (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dumas, J.S., Fox, J.E.: Usability testing. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, 3rd edn, pp. 1221–1241. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Backhaus, C.: Usability-Engineering in Der Medizintechnik: Grundlagen – Methoden – Beispiele. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Follmer, R., Gruschwitz, D., Jesske, B., Quandt, S., Lenz, B., Nobis, C., Köhler, K., Mehlin, M.: Mobilität in Deutschland 2008: Ergebnisbericht. Mobility in Germany Website (2010). http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de
  17. 17.
    Association of German Transport Companies (VDV): VDV-Statistik 2014. https://www.vdv.de/statistik-2014.pdfx
  18. 18.
    Mayhew, D.J.: The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner’s Handbook for User Interface Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooper, A.: The origin of personas (2008). http://www.cooper.com/journal/2008/05/the_origin_of_personas
  20. 20.
    Richter, M.: 100 Seiten Spezifikation – und was ist die Konsequenz für uns? In: OBJEKTspektrum (RE/2008) (2008). http://www.michaelrichter.ch/richter_OS_RE_08.pdf
  21. 21.
    Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brinck, T., Gergle, D., Wood, S.D.: Designing Web Sites that Work: Usability for the Web. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kappel, K., Wimmer, C., Bachl, S.: Usability engineering in der softwareentwicklung. In: Grechenig, T., Bernhart, M., Breiteneder, R., Kappel, K. (eds.) Softwaretechnik: Mit Fallbeispielen aus realen Entwicklungsprojekten, pp. 519–588. Pearson Studium, München (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kantner, L., Sova, D.H., Rosenbaum, S.: Alternative methods for field usability research. In: Jones, S.B., Novick, D.G., (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Documentation (SIGDOC 2003), 12–15 October 2003, San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 68–72. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nielsen, C.M., Overgaard, M., Pedersen, M.B., Stage, J., Stenild, S.: It’s worth the hassle!: the added value of evaluating the usability of mobile systems in the field. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI 2006), pp. 272–280. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B., Als, B.S., Høegh, R.T.: Is it worth the hassle? exploring the added value of evaluating the usability of context-aware mobile systems in the field. In: Brewster, S., Dunlop, M.D. (eds.) Mobile HCI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3160, pp. 61–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nielsen, J.: How to conduct a heuristic evaluation (1995). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluation/
  28. 28.
    Mayas, C., Hörold, S., Rosenmöller, C., Krömker, H.: Evaluating methods and equipment for usability field tests in public transport. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8510, pp. 545–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luise Künnemann
    • 1
  • Stephan Hörold
    • 1
  • Heidi Krömker
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Technische Universität IlmenauIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations