Abstract
Insects are very convenient for studying the scaling of organs and tissues which is associated with extreme miniaturization: first, they have a huge range of body sizes (the largest is more than 2000 times as long as the smallest); second, the smallest insects are comparable in size to unicellular organisms but retain high morphological complexity. Most insect organs display a huge potential for scaling and for retaining their organization and sometimes even their constant relative volume in spite of their size decreasing to only a small fraction of its initial value. By contrast, the relative volume of the reproductive and nervous systems increases by a considerable factor as body size decreases.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. F., Rahl, H., & Prange, H. D. (1979). Scaling of Supportive Tissue Mass. Quarterly Review Biology, 54(2), 139–148.
Bennett, P. M., & Harvey, P. H. (1985). Relative brain size and ecology in birds. Journal of Zoology, 207, 151–169.
Bernstein, S., & Bernstein, R. A. (1969). Relationships between foraging efficiency and the size of the head and component brain and sensory structures in the red wood ant. Brain Research, 16(1), 85–104.
Beutel, R. G., & Haas, A. (1998). Larval head morphology of Hydroscapha natans LeConte 1874 (Coleoptera, Myxophaga, Hydroscaphidae) with special reference to miniaturization. Zoomorphology, 118(2), 103–116.
Beutel, R. G., Pohl, H., & Hunefeld, F. (2005). Strepsipteran brain and effect of miniaturization (Insecta). Arthropod Structure & Development, 34(3), 301–313.
Carstens, Von S., & Storch, V. (1980). Beeinflussung der Ultrastruktur von Fettkorper und Mitteldarm des Staphyliniden Atheta fungi (Grav.) durch Umwelteinflusse. Zoologische Jahrbuecher Abteilung fuer Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere, 103, 73–84.
Cole, B. J. (1986). Size and behavior in ants: Constraints on complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 82, 8548–8551.
Eberhard, W. G. (2007). Miniaturized orb-weaving spiders: behavioural precision is not limited by small size. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2203–2209.
Eberhard, W. G. (2009). Static allometry and animal genitalia. Evolution, 63(1), 48–66.
Eberhard, W. G. (2011). Are smaller animals behaviourally limited? Lack of clear constraints in miniature spiders. Animal Behaviour, 81, 813–823.
Eberhard, W. G., & Wcislo, W. T. (2011). Grade changes in brain–body allometry: morphological and behavioural correlates of brain size in miniature spiders, insects and other invertebrates. Advances in Insect Physiology, 40, 155–214.
Franz, R., Hummel, J., Kienzle, E., Kölle, P., Gunga, H. C., & Clauss, M. (2009). Allometry of visceral organs in living amniotes and its implications for sauropod dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 1731–1736.
Goossen, H. (1949). Untersuchungen an gehirnen verschieden grosser, jeweils verwandter Coleopteren- und Hymenopteren. Arten Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Allgemeine Zoologie, 62, 1–64.
Gould, S. J. (1975). Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and evolution of brai. Contributions to primatology, 5, 244–292.
Hiestend, W. A. (1928). Strength and weight of insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 21, 601–606.
Huxley, J. (1932). Problems of relative growth. London: Methuen.
Ivanova-Kazas, O. M. (1961). Oчepки пo cpaвнитeльнoй эмбpиoлoгии пepeпoнчaтoкpылыx (Essays on the comparative embryology of Hymenoptera). Leningrad: Leningrad Univ. Press.
Mares, S., Ash, L., & Gronenberg, W. (2005). Brain allometry in bumblebee and honeybee workers. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 66, 50–61.
Martin, R. D. (1981). Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial vertebrates. Nature, 29, 57–60.
Platel, R. (1976). Analyse volumetrique compaire des principales subdividions enciphaliques chez les reptiles sauriens. Journal fur Hirnforschung, 17, 513–537.
Polilov, A. A. (2012). The smallest insects evolve anucleate neurons. Arthropod Structure & Development, 41(1), 27–32.
Polilov, A. A. (2014). Mopфoлoгичecкиe ocoбeннocти мeльчaйшиx нaceкoмыx (Morphological features of the smallest insects). Doctor Dissertation, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Polilov, A. A. (2015). Small is beautiful: features of the smallest insects and limits to miniaturization. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 103–121.
Polilov, A. A., & Beutel, R. G. (2009). Miniaturization effects in larvae and adults of Mikado sp. (Coleoptera: Ptiliidae), one of the smallest free-living insects. Arthropod Structure & Development, 38(3), 247–270.
Polilov, A. A., & Beutel, R. G. (2010). Developmental stages of the hooded beetle Sericoderus lateralis (Coleoptera: Corylophidae) with comments on the phylogenetic position and effects of miniaturization. Arthropod Structure & Development, 39(1), 52–69.
Prange, H. D., Anderson, J. F., & Rahn, H. (1979). Scaling of skeletal mass to body mass in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 113, 103–122.
Quesada, R., Triana, E., Vargas, G., Douglass, J. K., Seid, M. A., Niven, J. E., et al. (2011). The allometry of CNS size and consequences of miniaturization in orb-weaving and cleptoparasitic spiders. Arthropod Structure & Development, 40(6), 521–529.
Rensch, B. (1948). Histological changes correlated with evolutionary changes in body size. Evolution, 2, 218–230.
Riveros, A. J., & Gronenberg, W. (2010). Brain allometry and neural plasticity in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 75, 138–148.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984). Scaling: Why is animal size so important?. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Seid, M. A., Castillo, A., & Wcislo, W. T. (2011). The allometry of brain miniaturization in ants. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 77(1), 5–13.
Striedter, G. F. (2005). The principles of brain evolution. Inc, MA: Sinaur Assoc.
von Bonin, G. (1937). Brain-weight and bodyweight of mammals. The Journal of General Psychology, 16, 379–389.
Warton, D. I., Duursma, R. A., Falster, D. S., & Taskinen, S. (2012). smatr 3 - an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(2), 257–259.
Wehner, R. T., Fukushi, T., & Isler, K. (2007). On being small: brain allometry in ants. Brain Behav Evo., 69, 220–228.
Woude, E., Smid, H. M., Chittka, L., & Huigens, M. E. (2013). Breaking Haller’s rule: brain-body size isometry in a minute parasitic wasp. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 81(2), 86–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polilov, A.A. (2016). Changes in Relative Size of Organs that Accompany Decrease in Body Size. In: At the Size Limit - Effects of Miniaturization in Insects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39499-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39499-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39497-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39499-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)