Advertisement

Portfolio of Global Futures Algorithmic Trading Strategies for Best Out-of-Sample Performance

  • Aistis RaudysEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 255)

Abstract

We investigate two different portfolio construction methods for two different sets of algorithmic trading strategies that trade global futures. The problem becomes complex if we consider the out-of-sample performance. The Comgen method blindly optimizes the Sharpe ratio, and Comsha does the same but gives priority to strategies that individually have the better Sharpe ratio. It has been shown in the past that high Sharpe ratio strategies tend to perform better in out-of-sample periods. As the benchmark method, we use an equally weighted (1/N, naïve) portfolio. The analysis is performed on two years of out-of-sample data using a walk forward approach in 24 independent periods. We use the mean reversion and trend following datasets consisting of 22,702 and 36,466 trading models (time series), respectively. We conclude that Comsha produces better results with trend-following methods, and Comsha performs the same as Comgen with other type of strategies.

Keywords

Portfolio construction Algorithmic trading Sharpe ratio Optimization Comgen Comsha 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania under the grant MIP-100/2015. Authors also want to express their appreciation to Vilnius University.

References

  1. 1.
    Narang, R.K.: Inside the Black Box: A Simple Guide to Quantitative and High Frequency Trading. Wiley, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finan. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raudys, S., Raudys, A., Pabarskaite, Z.: Sustainable economy inspired large-scale feed-forward portfolio construction. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20(1), 79–96 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McNelis, P.D.: Neural Networks in Finance: Gaining Predictive Edge in the Market. Academic Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ustun, O., Kasimbeyli, R.: Combined forecasts in portfolio optimization: a generalized approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(4), 805–819 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamamoto, R., Ishibashi, T., Konno, H.: Portfolio optimization under transfer coefficient constraint. J. Asset Manag. 13(1), 51–57 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharpe, W.F.: Mutual fund performance. J. Bus. 39(1), 119–138 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hung, K., Cheung, Y., Xu, L.: An extended ASLD trading system to enhance portfolio management. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14(2), 413–425 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freitas, F.D., De Souza, A.F., de Almeida, A.R.: Prediction-based portfolio optimization model using neural networks. Neurocomputing 72(10–12), 2155–2170 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, J., Qiu, G., Cao, X.: Application of genetic algorithm based on dual mutation in the optimal portfolio selection. J. Nanchang Hangkong Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 4, 006 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jivendra, K.: Portfolio optimization using the quadratic optimization system and publicly available information on the WWW. Manag. Finan. 35(5), 439–450 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M., de Prado, M.L., Zhu, Q.J.: Pseudomathematics and financial charlatanism: the effects of backtest over fitting on out-of-sample performance. Not. AMS 61(5), 458–471 (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stein, M., Branke, J., Schmeck, H.: Efficient implementation of an active set algorithm for large-scale portfolio selection. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(12), 3945–3961 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raudys, A., Pabarskaite, Z.: Discrete portfolio optimisation for large scale systematic trading applications. In: 2012 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raudys, S., Raudys, A.: High frequency trading portfolio optimisation: integration of financial and human factors. In: 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA). IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haley, M.R.: Shortfall minimization and the Naive (1/N) portfolio: an out-of-sample comparison. Appl. Econ. Lett. 1–4 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Prado, M.L.: Recent trends in empirical finance. J. Portfolio Manag. 42(1), 29–33 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan, E.: Algorithmic Trading: Winning Strategies and Their Rationale. Wiley, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and InformaticsVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations