Visualizing Opportunities of Collaboration in Large Research Organizations

  • Mohammad Amin Yazdi
  • André Calero Valdez
  • Leonhard Lichtschlag
  • Martina Ziefle
  • Jan Borchers
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9751)

Abstract

In order to support interdisciplinary collaboration in a large organization, providing opportunities to meet new collaborators is essential. Besides offline approaches (e.g., conferences, colloquia, etc.) data driven and online approaches can be considered. Using the publication data and the additional profile information of researchers on a scientific portal, we try to support the process of uncovering opportunities for collaboration. For this purpose we develop a visualization that focuses on revealing potential co-authors that are a good fit according to track-record and profile information. In a design study we present the result of an iterative user-centered design process – a novel prototype and its evaluation. Overall, our visualization was able to inform researchers about valid collaboration opportunities while at the same time effectively conveying organizational information. Our prototype showed a high usability and loyalty score (SUS=82.5, NPS=40).

Keywords

Design study Interdisciplinarity Visualization collaboration Recommender system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the German Research Council DFG for the friendly support of the research in the excellence cluster “Integrative Production Technology in High Wage Countries”. This work was funded in part by the German B-IT Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobs, J.A., Frickel, S.: Interdisciplinarity: a critical assessment. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 35, 43–65 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Repko, A.F.: Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marzano, M., Carss, D.N., Bell, S.: Working to make interdisciplinarity work: investing in communication and interpersonal relationships. J. Agr. Econ. 57(2), 185–197 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cummings, J.N., Kiesler, S.: Who collaborates successfully? prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on CSCW, pp. 437–446. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valdez, A.C., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A.: Enhancing interdisciplinary cooperation by social platforms. In: Yamamoto, S. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8521, pp. 298–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Valdez, A.C., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C.: Using mixed node publication network graphs for analyzing success in interdisciplinary teams. In: Huang, R., Ghorbani, A.A., Pasi, G., Yamaguchi, T., Yen, N.Y., Jin, B. (eds.) AMT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7669, pp. 606–617. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P., Verganti, R.: Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency. Res. Eval. 21(1), 2–14 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M.L., Van de Sompel, H.: Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Inf. Process. Manage. 41(6), 1462–1480 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morel, C.M., Serruya, S.J., Penna, G.O., Guimarães, R.: Co-authorship network analysis: a powerful tool for strategic planning of research, development and capacity building programs on neglected diseases. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 3(8), e501 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, Y., Goncalves, J., Ferreira, D., Xiao, B., Hosio, S., Kostakos, V.: CHI 1994–2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, T.H., Huang, M.L.: Analysis and visualization of co-authorship networks for understanding academic collaboration and knowledge domain of individual researchers. In: 2006 International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation, pp. 18–23. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu, M.Q.Y., Faris, R., Ma, K.L.: Visual exploration of academic career paths. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 779–786. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu, W., Yesupriya, A., Wulf, A., Qu, J., Khoury, M.J., Gwinn, M.: An open source infrastructure for managing knowledge and finding potential collaborators in a domain-specific subset of pubmed, with an example from human genome epidemiology. BMC Bioinf. 8(1), 436 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaiwanarom, P., Ichise, R., Lursinsap, C.: Finding potential research collaborators in four degrees of separation. In: Cao, L., Zhong, J., Feng, Y. (eds.) ADMA 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6441, pp. 399–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehrlich, K., Lin, C.Y., Griffiths-Fisher, V.: Searching for experts in the enterprise: combining text and social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 117–126. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loepp, B., Hussein, T., Ziegler, J.: Choice-based preference elicitation for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3085–3094. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, J., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L.: Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 221–230. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kretschmer, H.: A new model of scientific colloboration part 1. theoretical approach. Scientometrics 46(3), 501–518 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Settles, B., Dow, S.: Let’s get together: the formation and success of online creative collaborations. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013, pp. 2009–2018 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wen, Z., Lin, C.Y.: On the quality of inferring interests from social neighbors. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 373–382. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schaar, A.K., Valdez, A.C., Ziefle, M.: Publication network visualization as an approach for interdisciplinary innovation management. In: 2013 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mayring, P.: Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (eds.) Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer, Wiesbaden (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watanabe, N., Washida, M., Igarashi, T.: Bubble clusters: an interface for manipulating spatial aggregation of graphical objects. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 173–182. ACM (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Amin Yazdi
    • 1
  • André Calero Valdez
    • 2
  • Leonhard Lichtschlag
    • 3
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 2
  • Jan Borchers
    • 3
  1. 1.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Human-Computer Interaction CenterRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  3. 3.Media Computing GroupRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations