Advertisement

More Than Just One Middleman: On the Value of Different Entry Modes by SMEs in Foreign Markets

  • Mette Vedel
  • Per Servais
Chapter

Abstract

In international business literature several researchers have applied the microeconomic concepts scope and scale economy in the context of foreign market servicing modes. Researchers discussing the optimal timing of Foreign Direct Investments have shown that in terms of total costs, it is favorable first to export to the foreign market via a local sales agency or a distributor due to scope economies and later on to switch to a production subsidiary due to scale economies. Export channel volume is therefore conceptualized as one of the determinants of entry mode choice. This chapter focuses differently by taking a network approach to internationalization. Setting of from the triadic entry nodes concept we highlight the value offered to small firms in the internationalization process by intermediaries operating as network informants, integrators and coordinators. Moreover, we challenge the viewpoint that foreign market entry is a mona dic relationship between one producer and one foreign party.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Social Network Analysis Foreign Market Entry Mode Business Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, W., & Martin, M. W. (1965). Toward a formal theory of transactions and transvections. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(2), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, P., & Anderson, E. (2002). The new e-commerce intermediaries. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(4), 53–62.Google Scholar
  4. Balderston, F. E. (1958). Communication networks in intermediate markets. Management Science, 4(2), 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baligh, H. H., & Richartz, L. E. (1964). An analysis of vertical market structures. Management Science, 10(4), 667–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartels, R. (1988). The history of marketing thought (3rd ed.). Columbus: Publishing Horizons, Inc..Google Scholar
  7. Benito, G. R., & Welch, L. S. (1994). Foreign market servicing: Beyond choice of entry mode. Journal of international Marketing, 2(2), 7–27.Google Scholar
  8. Bucklin, L. P. (1965). Postponement, speculation and the structure of distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(1), 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 57–91). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  10. Casson, M. (1997). Institutional economics and business history: A way forward? Business History, 39(4), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chetty, S., & Agndal, H. (2007). Social capital and its influence on changes in internationalization mode among small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement: Organizations and institutions: Sociological and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure), S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coviello, N. E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coviello, N. E., & Munro, H. J. (1995). Growing the entrepreneurial firm: Networking for international market development. European Journal of Marketing, 29(7), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, P. D. (2000). Social ties and foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, P. D. (2006). Factors affecting the termination propensity of inter-firm relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11), 1169–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and network structures. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 58–87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  18. Fung, P. K. O., Chen, I. S. N., & Yip, L. S. C. (2007). Relationships and performance of trade intermediaries: An exploratory study. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gadde, L., & Ford, D. (2008). Distribution research and the industrial network approach. The IMP Journal, 2(3), 36–52.Google Scholar
  20. Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 25–56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris, S., & Wheeler, C. (2005). Entrepreneurs’ relationships for internationalization: Functions, origins and strategies. International Business Review, 14(2), 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Havila, V., Johanson, J., & Thilenius, P. (2004). International business – Relationship triads. International Marketing Review, 21(2), 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hilmersson, M., & Jansson, H. (2012). International network extension processes to institutionally different markets: Entry nodes and processes of exporting SMEs. International Business Review, 21(4), 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmen, E., & Pedersen, A. (2003). Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulthén, K., & Gadde, L. (2007). Understanding the ‘new’ distribution reality through ‘old’ concepts: A renaissance for transvection and sorting. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 184–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16(4), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jansson, H., & Sandberg, S. (2008). Internationalization of small and medium sized enterprises in the Baltic Sea region. Journal of International Management, 14(1), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, Y. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems – A network approach. In N. Hood & J.-E. Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in global competition (pp. 287–314). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  30. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2003). Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lapierre, J. (1997). What does value mean in business-to-business professional services? International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(5), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Madhavan, R., Gnyawali, D. R., & He, J. (2004). Two’s company, three’s a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 918–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menon, A. (2005). Understanding customer value in business-to-business relationships. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 12(2), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molm, L. D., & Cook, K. S. (1995). Social exchange and exchange networks. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Social perspectives on social psychology (pp. 209–235). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  37. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.Google Scholar
  38. Obstfeld, D., Borgatti, S., & Davis, J. (2014). Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. In D. J. Brass, G. Labianca, A. Mehra, D. S. Halgin, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks. Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 40, pp. 135–159). Bradford: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Peng, M. W., & York, A. S. (2001). Behind intermediary performance in export trade: Transactions, agents, and resources. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sandberg, S. (2013). Emerging market entry node pattern and experiential knowledge of small and medium-sized enterprises. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sandberg, S. (2014). Experiential knowledge antecedents of the SME network node configuration in emerging market business networks. International Business Review, 23(1), 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simmel, G. (1950). The triad. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 145–169). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Spulber, D. F. (1996). Market microstructure and intermediation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006). Value-based differentiation in business relationships: Gaining and sustaining key supplier status. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Liere, D., & Koppius, O. (2007). Network horizon and obtaining a favorable network position. Communications of the ACM, 50(6), 35–35.Google Scholar
  47. Vedel, M. (Forthcoming). The triad value function – Theorizing the value potential of connected relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing.Google Scholar
  48. Vedel, M., Holma, A. and Havila, V. (2016). Conceptualizing inter-organizational triads. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 139–147Google Scholar
  49. Walter, A., Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2001). Value creation in buyer-seller relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(4), 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walter, A., Müller, T. A., Helfert, G., & Ritter, T. (2003). Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. The Internationalization of the Firm, 14, 83–98.Google Scholar
  52. Wolff, K.H. (1950) The sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press, Clencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
  53. Zhou, L., Wu, W. P., & Luo, X. (2007). Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhou, L., Wu, A., & Barnes, B. R. (2012). The effects of early internationalization on performance outcomes in young international ventures: The mediating role of marketing capabilities. Journal of International Marketing, 20(4), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mette Vedel
    • 1
  • Per Servais
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marketing and Management, International Business & EntrepreneurshipUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations