Advertisement

Does Being a Member of the Cluster Matter in the Process of Value Creation Through Internationalization?

  • Vesna Sedoglavich
  • Marina Dabić
Chapter

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) generally face tough competition in the countries where they are based. The ongoing process of globalization exerts further competitive pressure on value creation in these firms (Audretsch 2003). Value creation spreads over different levels (Lepak et al. 2007). Consequently, in a manner similar to large companies, more and more SMEs face the challenge of searching foreign markets for opportunities, which forces firms to change their strategies rapidly. At the same time, competition among knowledge-based SMEs intensifies, as these firms strive to develop capabilities faster than their rivals (Teece and Pisano 1994), to maximize created values (Jensen 2001), make them sustainable (Ciasullo and Troisi 2013), and increase value creation through mission (Andersen 2014) or by project management practices (Laursen and Svejvig 2016). According Bowman and Ambrosini (2000:13) value creation is determined by:

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Market Internationalization Process Entry Mode Industrial Cluster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen, E. S. (2014). Value creation using the mission breakdown structure. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 885–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D. B. (2003). SMEs in the age of globalization. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. T. (1955). The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caves, R. E. (1982). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, K. R. (1985). Multinational banks: Their identities and determinants. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ciasullo, M. V., & Troisi, O. (2013). Sustainable value creation in SMEs: A case study. The TQM Journal, 25(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coase, R. H. (1988). The nature of the firm: Influence. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 4(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, Q., & McFetridge, D. (1984). International technology transactions and the theory of the firm. Journal of Industrial Economics, 22(1), 141–162.Google Scholar
  11. Dobrzykowski, D. D., Tran, O., & Tarafdar, M. (2010). Value co-creation and resource based perspectives for strategic sourcing. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 3(2), 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(Spring/Summer), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Spring), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunning, J. H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enright, M. J. (1995). Organization and coordination in geographically concentrated industries. In N. Lamoreaux & D. Raff (Eds.), Coordination and information (pp. 103–142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Etemad, H., & Wright, R. W. (1999). Internationalization of SMEs: Management responses to a changing environment. Journal of International Marketing, 7(4), 4–10.Google Scholar
  18. Fornahl, D. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (Eds.), Cooperation, networks, and institutions in regional innovation systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Gassmann, A., & Zedtwitz, M. (1999). New concepts and trends in international R&D organization. Research Policy, 28, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon, I., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: Complex, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37(3), 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hennart, J. F. (1988). A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hennart, J. F. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Sciences, 37, 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hervas-Oliver, J., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2007). Do clusters capabilities matter? An empirical application of the resource-based view in clusters. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9(2), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingram, P. and Roberts, P.W. (2000). Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 387–423.Google Scholar
  25. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Corporate Applied Finance, 14(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems: A network approach. In N. Hood & J.-E. Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in global competition: Selected papers from the Prince Bertil symposium at the Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  27. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johansson, B., & Karlsson, C. (2001). Geographical transaction costs and specialization opportunities of small and medium-sized regions: Scale economies and market extension. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & R. R. Stough (Eds.), Theories of endogenous regional growth: Lessons for regional policies (pp. 150–180). Berlin: Springer-Vergal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karlsson, C., Johansson, B., & Stough, R. (2005). Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. Kimura, Y. (1989). Firm specific strategic advantages and foreign direct investment behavior of firms: The case of Japanese semi-conductor firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(Summer), 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8, 11–26.Google Scholar
  33. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Fall), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laursen, M., & Svejvig, P. (2016). Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 736–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leonidou, L. C., & Katsikeas, C. S. (1996). The export development process: An integrative review of empirical models. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), 517–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, S. M. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Farrell, P., Wood, P., & Zheng, J. (1998). Internationalization by business service SMEs: An inter-industry analysis. International Small Business Journal, 16(2), 101–117.Google Scholar
  39. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Towards a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1997). Challenges for internationalization process theory: The case of international new ventures. Management International Review, 37(2), 85–99.Google Scholar
  41. Perry, M. (2007). Business environments and cluster attractiveness to managers. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nation. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, (November–December), 77–90.Google Scholar
  44. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sabi, M. (1988). An application of the theory of foreign direct investment to multinational banking in LDCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Fall), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional networks and resurgence of silicon valley. California Management Review, 33(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma, D., & Keller, R. (1993). Exporting in a network: Relationship between technical consultancy and the sources of procurement. Advances in International Marketing, 5, 235–245.Google Scholar
  48. Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Terpstra, V., & Yu, C. (1988). Determinants of foreign investment of U.S. advertising agencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Spring), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, A., & Tontti, V. (2002). Social capital, knowledge and the international growth of technology-based new firms. International Business Review, 11(3), 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yu, C., & Ito, K. (1988). Oligopolistic reaction and foreign direct investment: The case of the U.S. tire and textile industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(Fall), 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weisfelder, C. J. (2001). Internationalization and the multinational enterprise: Development of a research tradition. Advances in International Marketing, 11, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Zyglidopoulos, S. C., DeMartino, R., & McHardy, R. D. (2006). Cluster reputation as a facilitator in the internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vesna Sedoglavich
    • 1
  • Marina Dabić
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Research School of Management, ANU College of Business and EconomicsAustralian National UniversityActonAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Management Division, Nottingham Business SchoolNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations