Skip to main content

Dealing with Large MDPs, Case Study of Waterway Networks Supervision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection (PAAMS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9662))

Abstract

Inland waterway networks are likely to go through heavy changes due to a will in increasing the boat traffic and to the effects of climate change. Those changes would lead to a greater need of an automatic and intelligent planning for an adaptive and resilient water management. A representative model is proposed and tested using MDPs with promising results on the water management optimization. The proposed model permits to coordinate multiple entities over multiple time steps in order to avoid a flood in the waterway network. However, the proposed model suffers a lack of scalability and is unable to represent a real case application. The advantages and limitations of several approaches of the literature are discussed according to our case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bellman, R.: A Markovian decision process. J. Math. Mech. 6, 679–684 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bichot, C.E., Siarry, P.: Graph Partitioning. Wiley-ISTE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boutilier, C., Dean, T., Hanks, S.: Decision-theoretic planning: structural assumptions and computational leverage. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 11, 1–94 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C., Dearden, R., Goldszmidt, M., et al.: Exploiting structure in policy construction. In: IJCAI, vol. 14, pp. 1104–1113 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brand, C., Tran, M., Anable, J.: The uk transport carbon model: an integrated life cycle approach to explore low carbon futures. Energy Policy 41, 107–124 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chades, I., Scherrer, B., Charpillet, F.: A heuristic approach for solving decentralized-POMDP: assessment on the pursuit problem. In: SAC 2002: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 57–62. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dean, T., Lin, S., Lin, S.: Decomposition techniques for planning instochastic domains. In: 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guestrin, C., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Multiagent planning with factored mdps. In: NIPS, vol. 1, pp. 1523–1530 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guestrin, C., Venkataraman, S., Koller, D.: Context-specific multiagent coordination and planning with factored mdps. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 253–259 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoey, J., St-Aubin, R., Hu, A., Boutilier, C.: Spudd: stochastic planning using decision diagrams. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 279–288. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kocsis, L., Szepesvári, C.: Bandit based Monte-Carlo planning. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, pp. 282–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lozenguez, G., Adouane, L., Beynier, A., Mouaddib, A.I., Martinet, P.: Punctual versus continuous auction coordination for multi-robot and multi-task topological navigation. Auton. Robots 40, 599–613 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mallidis, I., Dekker, R., Vlachos, D.: The impact of greening on supply chain design and cost: a case for a developing region. J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 118–128 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mihic, S., Golusin, M., Mihajlovic, M.: Policy and promotion of sustainable inland waterway transport in europe-danube river. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15(4), 1801–1809 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nair, R., Varakantham, P., Tambe, M., Yokoo, M.: Networked distributed POMDPs: a synthesis of distributed constraint optimization and POMDPs. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p. 7 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nouasse, H., Rajaoarisoa, L., Doniec, A., Duviella, E., Chuquet, K., Chiron, P., Archimede, B.: Study of drought impact on inland navigation systems based on a flow network model. In: 2015 XXV International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M., Barros, V., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., Dasgupta, P., et al.: Climate change 2014: synthesis report. contribution of working groups i, ii and iii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parr, R.: Flexible decomposition algorithms for weakly coupled Markov decision problems. In: 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 422–430 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Puterman, M.L.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabbadin, R.: Graph partitioning techniques for Markov Decision Processes decomposition. In: 15th Eureopean Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 670–674 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Desquesnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Desquesnes, G., Lozenguez, G., Doniec, A., Duviella, E. (2016). Dealing with Large MDPs, Case Study of Waterway Networks Supervision. In: Demazeau, Y., Ito, T., Bajo, J., Escalona, M. (eds) Advances in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9662. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39324-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39324-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39323-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39324-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics