Competition and Collaboration for Game-Based Learning: A Case Study

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is dedicated to discuss how competition and collaboration for playing have an impact on the learner’s strategy and the learning process. We examine what kind of effects can be expected when competition and collaboration are used as instructional techniques. This is done through a discussion about how these concepts are defined and through a brief overview of the literature dedicated to competition and collaboration in game-based learning contexts. We also discuss the results obtained with an empirical study carried out with Tamagocours, an online multiplayer Tamagotchi-like game dedicated to teach preservice teachers how to follow the legal rules that should be applied for the use of digital resources in educational contexts. In this chapter, we consider that playing encompasses two dimensions: an individual and conflictual play with an antagonist system and a collaborative play which is based on cooperation with the game (to accept to play) and/or with teammates. Game-based learning is thus coopetitive and results from conflictual interactions and epistemic interactions when players collaborate.

Keywords

Game-based learning Competition Collaboration 

References

  1. Abt, C. (1970). Serious games. New York, NY: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In P. Coirier & J. Andriessen (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (Vol. 5, pp. 179–202). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balacheff, N., Cooper, M., & Sutherland, R. (Eds.). (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: didactique des mathématiques (Didactique des Mathématiques, 1970–1990—Guy Brousseau). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Bouhineau, D., Lalle, S., Luengo, V., Mandran, N., Ortega, M., & Wajeman, C. (2013). Share data treatment and analysis processes in Technology Enhanced Learning. Paper presented at the Workshop Data Analysis and Interpretation for Learning Environments. Alpine Rendez-Vous 2013, Autrans, France.Google Scholar
  6. Bruckman, A. (1999). Can educational be fun? Paper presented at the Game Developers Conference ‘99, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Burguillo, J. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers & Education, 55(2), 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caillois, R. (1958/1967). Des jeux et des hommes. Le masque et le vertige. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, H. N. H., Wu, W. M. C., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2009). Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms. Computers & Education, 53(3), 866–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford, C. (1982). The art of computer game design. Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. DeVries, D. L., & Slavin, R. E. (1978). Teams-games-tournaments (TGT): Review of ten classroom experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 28–38.Google Scholar
  12. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  13. El-Nasr, M., Aghabeigi, B., Milam, D., Erfani, M., Lameman, B., Maygoli, H., & Mah, S. (2010). Understanding and evaluating cooperative games. Paper presented at the CHI 2010: Games and Players, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  14. Fabricatore, C. (2000). Learning and videogames: An unexploited synergy. Paper presented at the 2000 AECT National Convention, Secaucus, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Fluegelman, A., & Tembeck, S. (1976). The new games book. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  16. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Gee, J., & Shaffer, D. (2010). Looking where the light is bad; video games and the future of assessment. Edge, 6(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  19. Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gonçalves, C. (2013). Appropriation & authenticity—A didactical study on students’ learning experience while playing a serious game in epidemiology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Grenoble, Grenoble.Google Scholar
  21. Hense, J., Klevers, M., Sailer, M., Horenburg, T., Mandl, H., & Günthner, W. (2014). Using gamification to enhance staff motivation in logistics. In S. A. Meijer & R. Smeds (Eds.), Frontiers in gaming simulation (pp. 206–213). Stockholm: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  23. Inkpen, K., Booth, K., Klawe, M., & Upitis, R. (1995). Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning ‘95 (CSCL), Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–811). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.Google Scholar
  25. Juul, J. (2003). The game, the player, the world: Looking for a heart of gameness. Retrieved from http://www.jesperjuul.net/text/gameplayerworld/
  26. Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Education Technology Research & Development, 56, 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leemkuil, H., de Jong, T., de Hoog, R., & Christoph, N. (2003). KM Quest: A collaborative internet-based simulation game. Simulation & Gaming, 34(1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In S. Farr (Ed.), Aptitude learning, and instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  31. Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2012). Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Computer & Education, 59, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nalebuff, B., & Brandenburger, A. (1997). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  33. Ohlsson, S. (1995). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In P. Reiman & H. Spade (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 37–62). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  34. Parlett, D. (1999). The Oxford history of board games. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Plass, J., O’Keefe, P., Homer, B., Case, J., Hayward, E., Stein, M., et al. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1050–1066. doi:10.1037/a0032688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Provenzo, E. (1992). What do video games teach? Education Digest, 58, 56–58.Google Scholar
  37. Raessens, J. (2005). Computer games as participatory media culture. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 373–388). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play, game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sanchez, E., Emin Martinez, V., & Mandran, N. (2015). Jeu-game, jeu-play vers une modélisation du jeu. Une étude empirique à partir des traces numériques d’interaction du jeu Tamagocours. STICEF, 22(1), 9–44.Google Scholar
  42. Sanchez, E., Jouneau-Sion, C., Delorme, L., Young, S., Lison, C., & Kramar, N. (2012). Fostering epistemic interactions with a digital game. A case study about sustainable development for secondary education. Paper presented at the IOSTE XV International Symposium, La Medina—Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia.Google Scholar
  43. Schlieder, C., Kiefer, P., & Matyas, S. (2006). Geogames: Designing location-based games from classic board games. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(5), 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform in education. Éducation et didactique, 2(2), 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stjerning, J. (2010). Progress war. Retrieved February 24, 2016, from http://progresswars.com
  46. Suits, B. (1990). Grasshopper: Games, life and Utopia. Boston: David R. Godine.Google Scholar
  47. Sung, H., & Hwang, G. (2012). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (2015). How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education. Computers & Education. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131515300300
  49. Van der Meij, H., Albers, E., & Leemkuil, H. (2011). Learning from games: Does collaboration help? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Eck, R., & Dempsey, J. (2002). The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills a computer-based instructional simulation game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Villalta, M., Gajardo, I., Nussbaum, M., Andreu, J. J., Echeverría, A., & Plass, J. (2011). Design guidelines for classroom multiplayer presential games (CMPG). Computers & Education, 57(3), 2039–2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre d’enseignement et de recherche pour la formation a l’enseigment au secondaire I et IIUniversité de FribourgFribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations