Skip to main content

Self-Explanations in Game-Based Learning: From Tacit to Transferable Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Game-Based Learning ((AGBL))

Abstract

Game-based learning is often considered to be an effective instructional approach, but the effects of game-based learning are varied and far from optimal. Aside from many features and characteristics that might affect the results of game-based learning, we conjecture that games generally thrive on experiential learning and that experiential learning does increase knowledge, but that this knowledge is often implicit. We note that though implicit knowledge is certainly valuable, that in general explicit knowledge is considered more desirable in education, because it is more accessible and promotes transfer. It is suggested that explicit knowledge does not always automatically follow from the development of implicit knowledge, but that this process can be supported through self-explanations. Because self-explanations rarely occur automatically in game-based learning environments, we propose that self-explanations in game-based learning environments can be elicited by specific instructional approaches. Three possible approaches for eliciting self-explanations are discussed: question prompts, collaboration, and partial worked examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, D. M., & Clark, D. B. (2014). Integrating self-explanation functionality into a complex game environment: Keeping gaming in motion. Computers & Education, 73, 149–159. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147–179. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00061-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214. doi:10.3102/00346543070002181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. K., & Renkl, A. (2007). Interactive example-based learning environments: Using interactive elements to encourage effective processing of worked examples. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 375–386. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9055-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 86–107. doi:10.1007/bf02504859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65–79. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36, 209–231. doi:10.1080/14640748408402156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37, 345–363. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360–367. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, Part B, 55, 1201–1212. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Wang, K., & Lin, Y. (2015). The comparison of solitary and collaborative modes of game-based learning on students’ science learning and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 237–248. doi:10.2307/jeductechsoci.18.2.237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, A., Ball, L. J., & Lewis, C. N. (2005). In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Self-explanation, feedback and the development of analogical reasoning skills: Microgenetic evidence for a metacognitive processing account. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(89)90002-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The icap framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49, 219–243. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. doi:10.2307/1170744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriadis, S., Tsiatsos, T., & Karakostas, A. (2012). Scripted collaboration to guide the pedagogy and architecture of digital learning games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136. doi:10.1348/000709900158001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools: How effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 207–219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00489.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamalainen, R. (2008). Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning. Computers & Education, 50, 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Investigating the impact of integrating self-explanation into an educational game: A pilot study. In M. Chang, W.-Y. Hwang, M.-P. Chen, & W. Müller (Eds.), Edutainment technologies. Educational games and virtual reality/augmented reality applications (Vol. 6872, pp. 250–254). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining the effects of combining self-explanation principles with an educational game on learning science concepts. Interactive Learning Environments, 21, 104–115. doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.705850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2012). Facilitating third graders’ acquisition of scientific concepts through digital game-based learning: The effects of self-explanation principles. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of integrating self-explanation into a multi-user game on the acquisition of scientific concepts, Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 844–858. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.926276.

  • Inkpen, K., Booth, S. K., Klawe, M., & Upitis, R. (1995). Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1246–1252. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordi, R. (2010). Reframing the concept of reflection: Consciousness, experiential learning, and reflective learning practices. Adult Education Quarterly, 61, 181–197. doi:10.1177/0741713610380439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51, 1609–1620. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8, 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, S. S., Clark, D. B., & Adams, D. M. (2015). Self-explanation and explanatory feedback in games: Individual differences, gameplay, and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3, 162–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K., Kumalasari, C. D., & Howland, J. L. (2011). Self-explanation prompts on problem-solving performance in an interactive learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10, 96–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemkuil, H., & de Jong, T. (2012). Adaptive advice in learning with a computer based strategy game. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11, 653–665. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2012). Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Computers & Education, 59, 497–504. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 117–128. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F., Chung, G. K. W. K., Kerr, D., Vendlinski, T. P., Buschang, R. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Adding self-explanation prompts to an educational computer game. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 23–28. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works—a cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32, 59–82. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021815.74806.f6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, J. E., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2013). How much is too much? Learning and motivation effects of adding instructional explanations to worked examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 104–124. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (Eds.). (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R., Merrill, E., & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25, 203–244. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00035-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Vrugte, J., & de Jong, T. (2012). How to adapt games for learning: The potential role of instructional support. In S. Wannemacker, S. Vandercruysse, & G. Clarebout (Eds.), Serious games: The challenge (Vol. 280, pp. 1–5). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (2015). How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education. Computers & Education, 89, 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (in preparation). Game based mathematics education: Do fading worked examples facilitate knowledge acquisition?

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Wouters, P., Vandercruysse, S., Elen, J., & van Oostendorp, H. (2015). When a game supports prevocational math education but integrated reflection does not. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 462–480. doi:10.1111/jcal.12104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meij, H., Albers, E., & Leemkuil, H. (2011). Learning from games: Does collaboration help? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 655–664. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01067.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Croock, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: Program completion vs. Program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 365–394. doi:10.2190/mjdx-9pp4-kfmt-09pm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandercruysse, S., ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., Verschaffel, L., et al. (2015). “Zeldenrust”: A mathematical game-based learning environment for prevocational students. In J. Torbeyns, E. Lehtinen, & J. Elen (Eds.), Describing and studying domain-specific serious games (pp. 63–81). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 642–655. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. G. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78, 645–675. doi:10.3102/0034654308320320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., & van Oostendorp, H. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60, 412–425. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (2014). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 413–432). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Source of Funding

Sponsored by NWO under grant number 411-10-900 and FWO under grant number G.0.516.11.N.10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T. (2017). Self-Explanations in Game-Based Learning: From Tacit to Transferable Knowledge. In: Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H. (eds) Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39296-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39298-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics