Self-Explanations in Game-Based Learning: From Tacit to Transferable Knowledge
Game-based learning is often considered to be an effective instructional approach, but the effects of game-based learning are varied and far from optimal. Aside from many features and characteristics that might affect the results of game-based learning, we conjecture that games generally thrive on experiential learning and that experiential learning does increase knowledge, but that this knowledge is often implicit. We note that though implicit knowledge is certainly valuable, that in general explicit knowledge is considered more desirable in education, because it is more accessible and promotes transfer. It is suggested that explicit knowledge does not always automatically follow from the development of implicit knowledge, but that this process can be supported through self-explanations. Because self-explanations rarely occur automatically in game-based learning environments, we propose that self-explanations in game-based learning environments can be elicited by specific instructional approaches. Three possible approaches for eliciting self-explanations are discussed: question prompts, collaboration, and partial worked examples.
KeywordsSelf-explanation Question prompt Collaboration Partial worked example
Source of Funding
Sponsored by NWO under grant number 411-10-900 and FWO under grant number G.0.516.11.N.10.
- Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 932.Google Scholar
- Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Cheshire, A., Ball, L. J., & Lewis, C. N. (2005). In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Self-explanation, feedback and the development of analogical reasoning skills: Microgenetic evidence for a metacognitive processing account. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
- Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Demetriadis, S., Tsiatsos, T., & Karakostas, A. (2012). Scripted collaboration to guide the pedagogy and architecture of digital learning games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning.Google Scholar
- Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Investigating the impact of integrating self-explanation into an educational game: A pilot study. In M. Chang, W.-Y. Hwang, M.-P. Chen, & W. Müller (Eds.), Edutainment technologies. Educational games and virtual reality/augmented reality applications (Vol. 6872, pp. 250–254). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2012). Facilitating third graders’ acquisition of scientific concepts through digital game-based learning: The effects of self-explanation principles. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 71–82.Google Scholar
- Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of integrating self-explanation into a multi-user game on the acquisition of scientific concepts, Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 844–858. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.926276.
- Inkpen, K., Booth, S. K., Klawe, M., & Upitis, R. (1995). Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
- Kwon, K., Kumalasari, C. D., & Howland, J. L. (2011). Self-explanation prompts on problem-solving performance in an interactive learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10, 96–112.Google Scholar
- Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reber, S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (Eds.). (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (in preparation). Game based mathematics education: Do fading worked examples facilitate knowledge acquisition?Google Scholar
- Vandercruysse, S., ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., Verschaffel, L., et al. (2015). “Zeldenrust”: A mathematical game-based learning environment for prevocational students. In J. Torbeyns, E. Lehtinen, & J. Elen (Eds.), Describing and studying domain-specific serious games (pp. 63–81). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar