Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unweaving the Rainbow of Human Sexuality: A Review of One-Night Stands, Serious Romantic Relationships, and the Relationship Space in Between

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Psychology of Love and Hate in Intimate Relationships

Abstract

For 50 years, relationship researchers have primarily focused on two varieties of relationships; one-night stands and serious romantic relationships. Both of these are treated as (1) distinct relationships and (2) a comprehensive list of the relationships people of any sexual orientation engage in. However, over the last 10 years this apparent simplicity has been called into question; researchers have revealed a rainbow of potential relationships that individuals can and do engage in. From this perspective, relationships may act as “compromises” between two extremes (i.e., pure monogamy or pure zero-acquaintance sex) and are negotiated in the course of relationship development. Relationships then reflect different levels of short-term mating and long-term mating aspects simultaneously. In this review, we examine research on one-night stands, serious romantic relationships, booty-call relationships, friends-with-benefits, swinging, and polyamory. Throughout, we highlight the utility of evolutionary models to account for behaviors and patterns in these relationships and discuss the importance of an unbiased and unabashed look at the sex lives of people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This possibility is especially the case if one accepts Jonason et al. (2009) assertion that relationships are emergent properties from intersexual negotiations as opposed to preexisting types.

  2. 2.

    Sex that occurs among individuals with little sexual commitment.

  3. 3.

    Friends who also engage in sexual behavior together without any formal commitment.

  4. 4.

    Sexual relationships that tend to occur among acquaintances.

References

  • Afifi, W. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2000). On being ‘just friends’: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in crosssex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa, D. R., Flanders, C., Hatfield, E., & Heck, R. (2013). Positive psychology: What impact has it had on sex research publication trends? Sexuality and Culture, 17, 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzarini, R. N., Campbell, L., Holmes, B. M., Lehmiller, J. J., Harman, J. J., & Atkins, N. (Manuscript submitted). Perceptions of romantic partners in polyamorous relationships.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caruthers, A. S. (2006). “Hookups” and “friends-with-benefits”: Non-relational sexual encounters as contexts of women’s normative sexual development. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66, 5708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y., & Span, S. A. (2010). The effect of alcohol on sexual risk-taking among young men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 779–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. D, I. I. I., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M., Perilloux, C. et al. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 309–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J., & Valentine, B. (2012). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 124–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbins, L. A., & Tanfer, K. (2000). The influence of gender on sex: A study of men’s and women’s self-reported high-risk sex behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(3), 229–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the rainbow. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D., & Hardy, J. (2009). A guide to polyamory, open relationships, and other adventures. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hook-ups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Predictors of sexual hookups: A theory-based, prospective study of first-year college women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1425–1441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., & Byrne, D. (1978). Sex differences in response to erotica? Love versus lust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein, J., Bergstrand, C. R., & Cox, D. W. (2012). What do polys want?: An overview of the 2012 loving more survey. Loveland, CO: Loving More. Retrieved from http://www.lovemore.com/polyamory-articles/2012-lovingmore-polyamory-survey/

  • Forster, J., Ozelsel, A., & Epstude, K. (2010). How love and lust change people’s perception of relationship partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortenberry, J. D. (2003). Health behaviors and reproductive health risk within adolescent sexual dyads. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 279–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S., & Simpson, J. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hooking up: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garneau, C., Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). The role of family structure and attachment in college student hookups. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1473–1486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. C. (1987). When brothers share a wife. Natural History, 96, 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greitemeyer, T. (2007). What do men and women want in a partner? Are educated partners always more desirable? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2005). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2010). Culture, attachment style, and romantic relationships. In P. Erdman & K. -M. Ng (Eds.), Attachment: Expanding the cultural connections (pp. 227–242). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Hutchison, E. S. S., Bensman, L., Young, D., & Rapson, R. L. (2012a). Cultural, social, and gender influences on casual sex: New developments. In J. M. Turner & A. D. Mitchell (Eds.), Social psychology: New developments (pp. 1–37). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Luckhurst, C., & Rapson, R. L. (2012b). A brief history of attempts to measure sexual motives. Interpersona, 6, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzler, K. T., Giuliano, T. A, Herselman, G. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Three’s a crowd: Public awareness and (mis) perceptions of polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 1–19 (ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, R. J. (1985). Swinging: A replication and test of a theory. The Journal of Sex Research, 21(2), 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, R. J. (1998). Swinging: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(5), 507–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. D. (2013). Parent–child relationship quality directly and indirectly influences hooking up behavior reported in young adulthood through alcohol use in adolescence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1463–1472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K. (2007). A mediation hypothesis to account for the sex difference in reported number of sexual partners: An intrasexual competition approach. International Journal of Sexual Health, 19, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K. (2013). Four functions for four relationships: Consensus definitions in university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1407–1414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Li, N. P. (2013). Playing hard-to-get: Manipulating one’s perceived availability as a mate. European Journal of Personality, 27, 458–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: A compromise between men and women’s ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2010). Positioning the booty-call on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Luévano, V. X., & Adams, H. M. (2012a). How the dark triad traits predict relationship choices. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., & Li, N. P. (2012b). Human mating. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 371–377). Oxford: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Hatfield, E., & Boler, V. M. (2015). Who engages in serious and casual sex relationships? An individual differences perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2013). Casual hook up sex during the first year of college: Prospective associations with attitudes about sex and love relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1451–1462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9, 565–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40(2), 129–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W., Giordano, P., & Longmore, M. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Condom use on spring-break vacation: The influence of intentions, prior use, and context1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1010–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why do humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, M., & Stelboum, J. P. (1999). The lesbian polyamory reader: Open relationships, non-monogamy and casual sex. In M. Munson & J. P. Stelboum (Eds.), The lesbian polyamory reader (pp. 1–10). London, England: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G. H. (1969). On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. The American Naturalist, 103, 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., & Hayes, A. (2002). The causalities of “casual” sex” a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, W. C., Miller, L. C., Putcha-Bhagavatula, A. D., & Yang, Y. (2002). Evolved sex differences in the number of partners desired? The long and the short of it. Psychological Science, 13, 157–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pines, A., & Aronson, E. (1981). Polyfidelity. Alternative Lifestyles, 4, 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puentes, J., Knox, D., & Sussman, M. E. (2008). Participants in “friends-with-benefits” relationships. College Student Journal, 42, 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, A. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2014). Consensual nonmonogamy: Psychological well-being and relationship quality correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 4, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C., & Jetha, C. (2011). Sex at dawn. Carlton North, Victoria, Australia: Scribe Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behavior across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18, 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 31, 747–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on romantic attachment and culture: How ecological stressors influence dismissing orientations across genders and geographies. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Attachment and sexual permissiveness: Exploring differential associations across genders, cultures, and facets of short-term mating. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 46, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Angleiter, A., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person’s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 560–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, E. (2013). The polyamorists next door: Inside multiple partner relationships and families. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. C., Erickson, P. I., Badaine, L., Diaz, R., Ortiz, D., Abraham, T.et al. (2006). Syndemics, sex, and the city: Understanding sexually transmitted diseases in social and cultural context. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2010–2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smiler, A. P. (2008). “I wanted to get to know her better”: Adolescent boys’ dating motives, masculinity ideology, and sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. A., Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. E. (2005). Sex differences and similarities in preferred mating arrangements. Sexualities, Evolution, and Gender, 7, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1997). Evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taormino, T. (2008). Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. San Francisco, CA: Cleis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappé, M., Bensman, L., Hayashi, K., & Hatfield, E. (2013). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers: A new research prototype. Interpersona, 7, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behaviors, 40, 1173–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation: Sex differences in motivation and emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behaviors, 16, 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veaux, F. (2011). Care and feeding of polyamorous secondary relationships. Retrieved from https://www.morethantwo.com/primarysecondary.html

  • Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sex relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 29, 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R., & Peterson, D. (1997). Demonic males. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Campe, J. W., & Myers, D. M. (2009). How low will men with high self-esteem go? Self-esteem as a moderator of gender differences in minimum relationship standards. Sex Roles, 61, 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia

    Peter K. Jonason

  2. University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

    Rhonda N. Balzarini

Authors
  1. Peter K. Jonason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhonda N. Balzarini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter K. Jonason .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology, Hawaii Pacific University, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

    Katherine Aumer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jonason, P.K., Balzarini, R.N. (2016). Unweaving the Rainbow of Human Sexuality: A Review of One-Night Stands, Serious Romantic Relationships, and the Relationship Space in Between. In: Aumer, K. (eds) The Psychology of Love and Hate in Intimate Relationships. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39277-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation