Skip to main content

Quantitative Geological Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Mining Geology

Part of the book series: Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences ((MASE,volume 12))

  • 3198 Accesses

Abstract

The 3D geological models are the basis for delineating the mineralised domains which underline the whole process of the mineral resource estimation and also serves as a key parameter for selection of the mining methods and eventual conversion of the resources to reserves. Degree of the geological model’s uncertainty need to be estimated during the project evaluation studies and the risks of a project’s failure caused by incorrectly interpreted geology quantified and incorporated into classification of the mineral resources and ore reserves

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abzalov MZ (2010) Optimisation of ISL resource models by incorporating algorithms for quantification risks: geostatistical approach. In: Technical meeting on in situ leach (ISL) uranium mining. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 7–10 June, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Humphreys M (2002a) Resource estimation of structurally complex and discontinuous mineralisation using non-linear geostatistics: case study of a mesothermal gold deposit in northern Canada. Exp Min Geol J 11(1–4):19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Humphreys M (2002b) Geostatistically assisted domaining of structurally complex mineralisation: method and case studies. Geostatistically assisted domaining of structurally complex mineralisation: method and case studies. In: The AusIMM 2002 conference: 150 years of mining, Publication series No 6/02, pp 345–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov MZ, Drobov SR, Gorbatenko O, Vershkov AF, Bertoli O, Renard D, Beucher H (2014) Resource estimation of in-situ leach uranium projects. Appl Earth Sci 123(2):71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M, Galli A, Beucher H, Le Loc’h G, Renard D, Doligez B, Eschard R, Geffroy F (2011) Plurigaussian simulation in geosciences, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p149

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bleines C, Bourges M, Deraisme J, Geffroy F, Jeanne N, Lemarchand O, Perseval S, Poisson J, Rambert F, Renard D, Touffait Y, Wagner L (2013) ISATIS software. Geovariances, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiles J-P (1988) Fractals and geostatistical methods for modelling of a fracture network. Math Geol 20(6):631–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RM (2005) Probabilistic modelling of ore lens geometry: an alternative to deterministic wireframes. Math Geol 37(5):513–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegman CL (2001) How domain envelopes impact on the resource estimate – case studies from the Cobar gold filed, NSW, Australia. In: Edwards AC (ed) Mineral resource and ore reserves estimation – the AusIMM guide to good practice. AusIMM, Melbourne, pp 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abzalov, M. (2016). Quantitative Geological Models. In: Applied Mining Geology. Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39264-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics