Advertisement

No Longer Being-There: Phenomenology and Death

  • Paul J. EnnisEmail author
Chapter
  • 475 Downloads
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 86)

Abstract

In contemporary Continental philosophy there has been a recent trend toward realism and a rejection of what Quentin Meillassoux names correlationism. However, one of the most significant responses to Meillassoux’s position has come from the contemporary Derridean Martin Hägglund and it brings us indirectly to what this author contends lies at the heart of the phenomenological conception of death. Meillassoux is critical of the correlationist position because it cannot think the time before being, especially as discussed in the natural sciences. To be concise Meillassoux is concerned with whether it is possible to think this time without rendering them through a correlationist, or in a lighter phrase, anti-realist, lens. In After Finitude one example provided of how powerful correlationism is, comes through the excision of mind-independent primary (or mathematical) qualities in the post-Kantian tradition as thinkable in-themselves – a position Meillassoux claims has come to be seen as naïve (realism). What then, for instance, to make of statements about the time before being, indexed by ‘arche-fossils’ referring to ‘the existence of an ancestral reality or event’? The answer Meillassoux notes is usually given as intersubjectivity. This may not, at first, seem contentious.

Keywords

Correlationism Death Speculative realism Heidegger Meillassoux Brassier Subjectivity 

References

  1. Alweiss, Lilian. 2007. Leaving metaphysics to itself. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15(3): 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alweiss, Lilian. 2009. Between internalism and externalism: Husserl’s account of intentionality. Inquiry 52(1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bambach, Charles R. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the crisis of historicism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Braig, Carl. 1896. Vom Sein: Abriß der Ontologie. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  5. Brassier, Ray. 2007. Nihil unbound: enlightenment and extinction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brentano, Franz. 1862. Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  7. Bulhof, Ilse. 1980. Wilhelm Dilthey: a hermeneutic approach to the study of history and culture. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulhof, Ilse. 2011. The return of anti-religion: from radical atheism to radical theology. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 11(2): 32–124.Google Scholar
  9. Caputo, John D. 2005. In praise of ambiguity. In Ambiguity in the western mind, ed. Craig J.N. de Paulo, Patrick Messina, and Marc Stier, 15–34. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, Jacques. 1993. Aporias. Trans. Thomas Dutoit. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. The Work of Mourning. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Paper Machine. Trans. Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ennis, Paul J. 2011. The transcendental core of correlationism. Cosmos and History 7(1): 37–48.Google Scholar
  14. Glazebrook, Trish. 2001. Heidegger and scientific realism. Continental Philosophy Review 34: 361–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gratton, Peter. 2009. After the subject: Meillassoux’s ontology of “What May Be”. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy 20: 55–80.Google Scholar
  16. Haar, Michel. 1993. Heidegger and the Essence of Man. Trans. William McNeill. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hägglund, Martin. 2009. The challenge of radical atheism: a response. CR: The New Centennial Review 9(1): 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays, 3–35. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, Martin. 1982a. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, Martin. 1982b. Von Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit. Einleitung in die Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, Martin. 1992. The Concept of Time. Trans. William McNeill. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning). Trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heidegger, Martin. 2003. Only a God can save us: Der Spiegel’s Interview (September 23, 1966). In Martin Heidegger: philosophical and political writings, ed. Manfred Stassen, 24–48. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. Heidegger, Martin. 2006. Mindfulness. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  26. Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Husserl, Edmund. 1970a. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Husserl, Edmund. 1970b. Philosophie der Arithmetik: Psychologische und Logische Untersuchungen, I. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  29. Husserl, Edmund. 1980. The Idea of Phenomenology. Trans. William Alston and George Nakhnikian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  30. Husserl, Edmund. 1993a. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil: Prolegomena zur Reinen Logik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Husserl, Edmund. 1993b. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. John, E. 1988. Husserl’s position between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert school of Neo-Kantianism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 26(2): 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Levinas, Emmanuel. 2005. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1991. The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1969. Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians: The distinction of the Geisteswissenschaften and the Kulturwissenschaften. Journal of the History of Philosophy 7(4): 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meillassoux, Quentin. 2008a. Spectral Dilemma. In Collapse IV: Concept horror, ed. Robin Mackay, 261–275. Falmouth: Urbanomic.Google Scholar
  38. Meillassoux, Quentin. 2008b. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. Ray Brassier. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  39. Meillassoux, Quentin. 2014. Time without becoming. Trans. Anna Longo. London: Mimesis International.Google Scholar
  40. Roth, Michael. 1996. The poetics of resistance: Heidegger’s line. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sellars, Wilfred. 1991. Science, perception and reality. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  42. Sellars, Wilfred. 1997. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sparrow, Tom. 2014. The end of phenomenology: Metaphysics and the new realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Žižek, Slavoj, and Glyn Daly. 2004. Conversations with Žižek. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations