The Gift and the Skin: Derrida and Levinas on Language, Metaphor and Subjectivity

  • Arthur CoolsEmail author
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 86)


In this article, I discuss the ambiguous role of metaphor in the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. In line with Heidegger’s criticism of metaphor as a means of metaphysical thinking, both relate language to an otherness that exceeds any ontological clarification. However, both reintroduce basic metaphors in order to be able to address the question of subjectivity: the skin in Levinas’ analysis of substitution in Otherwise than Being, the gift in Derrida’s writings, in particluar his readings of Plato’s pharmakon. In focusing on these two metaphors, I have a double intention: to show that they are indeed ‘basic’ and that they reveal the different orientation of both philosophies in an irreducible way. My main argument in order to achieve this goal is rather paradoxical: it consists in arguing that the appearance of the metaphor of the skin in Levinas’ philosophy and that of the gift in Derrida’s are dependent upon the way each of them conceives the non-metaphorical relationship of language to otherness, that I call “otherness by excess” in the case of Levinas and “otherness by default” in the case of Derrida.


Metaphor Subjectivity Metaphysics Language Substitution 


  1. Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Trans. J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology. Trans. G. Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Plato’s pharmacy. In Dissemination. Trans. B. Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. White mythology: Metaphor in the text of philosophy. In Margins of philosophy, ed. A. Bass, 207–271. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 2007. The retrait of metaphor. In Psyche: inventions of the other, ed. P. Kamuf, 48–80. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Gift of Death & Literature in Secret. Trans. D. Wills. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, Martin. 1991. The Principle of Reason. Trans. R. Lilly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time. Trans. J. Stambaugh. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, Martin. 2011. Letter on humanism. In Basic Writings. Trans. F. A. Capuzzi and J. G. Greay, 147–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Trans. A. Lingis. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  12. Levinas, Emmanuel. 2009. Notes sur la métaphore. In Œuvres 1. Carnets de captivité suivi de Écrits sur la captivité et Notes philosophiques divers, ed. Rodolphe Calin and Catherine de Chalier, 227–242. Paris: Grasset & Fasquelle/IMEC Editeur.Google Scholar
  13. Van der Heiden, Gert-Jan. 2013. Heidegger thinking (without) metaphors: on ‘The House of Being’ and ‘Words, as Flowers’. In Metaphors in modern and contemporary philosophy, eds. Arthur Cools, Walter Van Herck, Koenraad Verrycken, 227–241. Brussels: University of Antwerp Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for European PhilosophyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations