Advertisement

Substitution and Mit(da)sein: An Existential Interpretation of the Responsibility for the Other

  • Ileana BorţunEmail author
Chapter
  • 475 Downloads
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 86)

Abstract

This paper challenges Levinas’s thesis that it is necessary to escape Heidegger’s fundamental ontology in order to think ethically. It discusses how Levinas thinks the ethical relationship in Otherwise than Being, as “substitution,” as “responsibility for the responsibility of the other,” and it shows that one’s responsibility for the other’s responsibility can also be interpreted existentially, as authentic Fürsorge, as care for the other’s care. The “substitution of one for the other” and the “care for the other” are indeed different, but not antithetical. Firstly, Dasein’s authentic existentiell understanding of the other does not reduce him to “the same”, because it does not “reduce” him to the apriori structures of Dasein. Secondly, the equiprimordiality of “Being-with” (Mitsein) and “Dasein-with” (Mitdasein) – in short, Mitt(da)sein – indicates the exposure of one to the other within the factical modes of Being-with-one-another and, therefore, the indebtedness of one to the other for one’s potentiality-for-Being. Consequently, Dasein’s assumed responsibility or authentic care for its potentiality-for-Being is not ego(t)istic, as Levinas contends, but entails caring for the other’s Being, for his unique otherness.

Keywords

Levinas Substitution Heidegger Mitsein Mitdasein Responsibility Care 

References

  1. Bernasconi, Robert. 2002. What is the question to which “substitution” is the answer? In The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, ed. Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi, 234–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dastur, Françoise. 2002. The call of conscience. The most intimate alterity. In Heidegger and practical philosophy, ed. François Raffoul and David Pettigrew, 87–97. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. Violence and metaphysics: An essay on the thought of Emmanuel Levinas [1964]. In Jacques Derrida, Writing and Difference (trans: Alan Bass), 97–192. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time (trans: John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1993a. The origin of the work of art [1935–6] (trans: Albert Hofstadter). In Martin Heidegger, Basic Writings, ed. Davis Farrell Krell, 139–212. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1993b. Letter on “humanism” [1946] (trans: Frank A. Capuzzi and J. Glenn Gray). In Martin Heidegger, Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell, 213–265. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditations [1929-] (trans: Dorion Cairns). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1951. L’Ontologie est-elle fondamentale?. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1 (janvier-mars):88–98.Google Scholar
  9. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority [1961] (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1971. Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’extériorité. Paris: Livre de PocheGoogle Scholar
  10. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Time and the Other [1948] (trans: Richard A. Cohen). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990. Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism [1934] (trans: Seán Hand). Critical Inquiry 17(1):62–71.Google Scholar
  12. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1996a. Martin Heidegger and Ontology [1932] (trans: by The Committee of Public Safety). Diacritics 26 (1):11–32.Google Scholar
  13. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1996b. Is Ontology fundamental? (trans: Simon Critchley, Peter Atterton, and Graham Noctor). In Emmanuel Levinas, Basic Philosophical Writings, ed. Adriaan Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernasconi, 1–10. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1998. From the one to the other: transcendence and time [1983] (trans. Michael B. Smith and Barbara Harshav). In Emmanuel Levinas, Entre Nous: On Thinking-of-the-Other, 133–153. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levinas, Emmanuel. 2011. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence [1974] (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lilly, Reginald. 2008. Levinas’s Heideggerian fantasm. In French interpretations of Heidegger. An exceptional reception, ed. David Pettigrew and François Raffoul, 35–58. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2005. A note concerning the ontological indifference [1998]. In Emmanuel Levinas. Critical assessments of leading philosophers, Levinas, phenomenology and his critics, vol. I, ed. Katz Claire and Trout Clara, 312–325. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2011. The Reason of the Gift [2008] (trans: Stephen E. Lewis). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1999. La Communauté désœuvrée [1983/1986]. Paris: Christian Bourgois.Google Scholar
  20. Raffoul, François. 2005. Being and the other: Ethics and ontology in Levinas and Heidegger [1999]. In Addressing Levinas, ed. Nelson Eric Sean, Kapust Antje, and Still Kent, 138–151. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Raffoul, François. 2010. The origins of responsibility. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schürmann, Reiner. 2003. Broken Hegemonies [1996] (trans: Reginald Lilly). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Romanian Society for PhenomenologyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations