Skip to main content

Assessment Policy Enactment in Education Systems: A Few Reasons to Be Optimistic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 4))

  • 7030 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the topic addressed in Part I: Assessment Policy Enactment in Education Systems. It starts from the position that while there is a lot to be learned about policy enactment, there are several reasons to be optimistic. It ties together the common policy challenges and directions faced by different education systems around the world before introducing new perspectives on policy implementation. The concept of co-regulation is the explanatory framework used to describe possible variations in models of policy implementation and to account for the challenges met by both policy designers and enactors. Several recommendations resulting from the evidence presented in the chapters in Part I are submitted to move forward in policy implementation. Some of them are already showing promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ben Jaafar, S., & Anderson, S. (2007). Policy trends and tensions in accountability for educational management and services in Canada. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, W. M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VIII. Santa Monica, California: Implementing and sustaining innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 623–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1988). Assessment and accountability. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, C. A., & Fierro, L. A. (2012). Evaluation policy to implementation: An evaluation of scientifically based research in practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coherent Curriculum. (2014, March 3). In S. Abbott (Ed.), The glossary of education reform. http://edglossary.org/coherent-curriculum/. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.

  • Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2014). Challenging conceptions of assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, R. R., & Clifford, M. (2006). Evaluation in the wild: A distributed cognition perspective on teacher assessment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 578–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R., & Sullivan, T. A. (2012). The social organization of work (5th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusche, D., Laveault, D., MacBeath, J., & Santiago, P. (2012). OECD Reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: New Zealand 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264116917~en. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.

  • OECD. (2011). Evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes. Common policy challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/46927511.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2014.

  • OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, C. M., & Hutchins, E. L. (1992). Error as opportunity: Learning in a cooperative task. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 409–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W. M. K. (2009). Evaluation policy and evaluation practice. In W. M. K. Trochim, M. M. Mark & L. J. Cooksy (Eds.), Evaluation policy and evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation (Vol. 123, pp. 13–32).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinbaum, E. H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2010). Planning ahead: Make program implementation more predictable. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, D., Hayward, L., & Pandya, J. (Eds.). (2016). The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dany Laveault .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laveault, D. (2016). Assessment Policy Enactment in Education Systems: A Few Reasons to Be Optimistic. In: Laveault, D., Allal, L. (eds) Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39209-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39211-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics