Skip to main content

Learning and Teaching When the Child Has Special Educational Needs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2357 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the aim is to use the cultural-historical perspective to analyse school practices of children with disabilities and understand learning of children with so-called “Special educational needs”. It is discussed how the threshold for when special educational needs emerge depends on three aspects: (1) The organisation of the learning setting, (2) the particular impairments of the child and (3) the change in support and demands within the setting through time. The incongruence, which arises when a child with an impairment has to learn in practices cultivated for typically developing children, has the potential to constrain cognitive and neural development through its impact on the possibilities of the child to participate in activities. Furthermore, the role of assessments is discussed in relation to the cultural-historical point that cognitive functioning as an innate and stable ability needs to be supplemented with a concept of cognitive potential focusing on how to employ the potential through learning and providence of the right means for the child to participate. Next, the role of motives is discussed. Creating opportunities for the active participation of children with severe disabilities might be more difficult not only because of their limited ability to act independently, but also because many children with severe disabilities come to school with motives typical of younger children. If the children are expected to participate in teaching activities with implicit cultural expectations to the children’s motivational developmental level it easily results in lower participation in learning activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Inclusion and the standards agenda: Negotiating policy pressures in England. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10(4–5), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramidis, B., & Norwich, E. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T. (1999). Viewing inclusion from a distance: Gaining perspective from comparative study. Support for Learning, 14(4), 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughan, M., & Shaw, L. (2000). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in school. Bristol: CSIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottcher, L. (2010). Children with spastic cerebral palsy, their cognitive functioning, and social participation: A review. Child Neuropsychology, 16(3), 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøttcher, L. (2012). The learning and development of children with severe disabilities – Continuities and discontinuities from children without disabilities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøttcher, L., & Dammeyer, J. (2012). Disability as a dialectical concept: Building on Vygotsky’s defectology. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, P., Pisha, B., Dalton, B., Zeph, L. A., & Smith, N. C. (2012). Literacy by design: A universal design for learning approach for students with significant Intellectual disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1978). Special educational needs: Report of the committee of the enquiry into the education of handicapped children and young people (The Warnock report). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L., & Crocker, S. (2008). Psychological processes in deaf children with complex needs. An evidence-based practical guide. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, E. B., & Dikel, T. N. (2001). Cognitive and neuropsychological functioning in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 16(1), 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forling, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teachers preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Questions of method. In J. D. Faubin (Ed.), Michael Foucault: Power (pp. 223–238). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Hamson, C. O., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. J., & Slee, R. (2006). Inclusion? Disability studies in education. American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual conference, San Francisco. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au

  • Greeno, J. G. (1989). A perspective on thinking. American Psychologist, 44, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2007). The development of children’s conceptual relation to the world with a focus on concept formation in preschool children’s activity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 246–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, H. C., & Litz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, M., Kopechanski, L., Cameron, R., & Hughes, D. (2008). In transition: Experiences of parents of children with special needs at school entry. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, K. M., Lieshout, E., Maathuis, K., Keus, I., & Gorter, J. (2007). The effect of cerebral palsy on arithmetic accuracy is mediated by working memory, intelligence, early numeracy and instruction time. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32(3), 861–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, K., Lieshout, E., & De Moor, J. (2009). Arithmetic achievement in children with cerebral palsy or spina bifida meningomyelocele. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998). Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebeer, J. (2005). Shifting perspective: Dynamic assessment of learning processes in children with developmental disturbances. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 1, 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeer, J., Birta-Székely, N., Demeter, K., Bohacs, K., Candeias, A. A., Sønnesyn, G., Partanen, P., & Dawson, L. (2011). Re-assessing the current assessment practice of children with special educational needs in Europe. School Psychology International, 33(1), 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L. S. Vygotsky. School Psychology International, 16, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Oxford: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maller, S. J. (1997). Deafness and WISC-III item difficulty: Invariance and fit. Journal of School Psychology, 35(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Charklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. R. (1973). Labelling the mentally retarded. Clinical and social system perspectives on mental retardation. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (Ed.). (2005). Contextualising inclusive education: Evaluating old and new international perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2008). What really works in special and inclusive education. Using evidence-based strategies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, B. (1993). Has ‘Special Educational Needs’ outlived its usefulness? In J. Visser & G. Upton (Eds.), Special education in Britain after Warnock (pp. 44–58). London: Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, B. (2002). Education, inclusion and individual differences: Recognising and resolving dilemmas. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 482–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., Daniels, H., Goergeson, J., Hacker, J., Gallop, V., Feiler, A., Tarleton, B., & Watson, D. (2008). Disability data collection for children’s services. Research report. Department for Children, Schools and Families, (DCSF-RR062/DCSF-RB062). Barth: University of Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbadini, M., Bonanni, R., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2001). Neuropsychological assessment of patients with severe neuromotor and verbal disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 45(2), 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu, K. W. M., & Lam, M. S. (2012). Public computer assisted learning facilities for children with visual impairment: Universal design for inclusive learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiers, P., Vanderkelen, R., Vanneste, G., Coene, S., De, R. M., & Vandenbussche, E. (2002). Visual-perceptual impairment in a random sample of children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44, 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (1993). A broad, balanced, relevant and differentiated curriculum. In J. Visser & G. Upton (Eds.), Special education in Britain after Warnock (pp. 1–12). London: David Pulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol 2: The fundamentals of defectology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected work of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol 5: Child psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C. (1990). Learning characteristics of students with special needs and the provision of effective schooling. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Raynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Special educational research and practice (pp. 1–34). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D., Craft, S., Hale, S., & Park, T. S. (1994). Working memory and articulation rate in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Neuropsychology, 8, 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bøttcher, L., Dammeyer, J. (2016). Learning and Teaching When the Child Has Special Educational Needs. In: Development and Learning of Young Children with Disabilities. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39114-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39114-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39112-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39114-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics